IP Library Granted Patent US 12,640,338
Granted Patent B2
US 12,640,338 · App. 17/967,854 · Granted May 26, 2026

Screening edge placement uniformity wafer stochastics

Inventor: Stefan Eyring (Weilburg, DE)
Assignee: KLA Corporation
H01J37/222H01J37/244H01J37/28H01J2237/2814H01J2237/2817
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,640,338
App. No.
17/967,854
Granted
May 26, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A simulated tool signal is determined from design data and tool properties of the tool making the measurements. A design-assisted composite signal is determined from measurements. An edge placement uniformity signal is then determined by comparing the simulated tool signal and the design-assisted composite signal. A shape and/or an area of the edge placement uniformity signal can be analyzed. The edge placement uniformity signal enables screening of structures with respect to wafer stochastics without the need to fully characterize all individual structures.

Claims (30)

1 . A method comprising:

determining, using a processor, a design-assisted composite signal from a plurality of features on a wafer using measurements of the wafer from a wafer metrology tool and a design of the wafer, wherein the design-assisted composite signal is a combination of the measurements;

determining, using the processor, a simulated tool signal for the design of the wafer that accounts for noise sources and imaging properties of the wafer metrology tool;

determining, using the processor, an edge placement uniformity signal that is a difference between the design-assisted composite signal and the simulated tool signal; and

analyzing a shape and/or an area of the edge placement uniformity signal thereby determining placement of stochastics, wherein the shape and the area are caused by at least the stochastics.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the wafer metrology tool is a scanning electron microscope.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements of the wafer are generated during overlay measurements of the wafer.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a distribution of edge placement errors based on the shape.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising inspecting the wafer at locations with the edge placement errors.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements are of a plurality of lines of devices on the wafer.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein each of the plurality of lines has one of the edge placement uniformity signals.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising comparing, using the processor, the edge placement uniformity signal against a specification for the wafer.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the design-assisted composite signal is an average of the measurements.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the feature is an edge of a structure on the wafer.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the feature is a center of a structure on the wafer.

12 . A non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program configured to instruct the processor to execute the method of claim 1 .

13 . A system comprising:

a particle beam source that generates a particle beam;

a stage configured to hold a wafer in a path of the particle beam;

a detector that receives particles from the wafer; and

a processor in electronic communication with the detector, wherein the processor is configured to:

determine a design-assisted composite signal from a plurality of features on the wafer using measurements of the wafer and a design of the wafer, wherein the design-assisted composite signal is a combination of the measurements;

determine a simulated tool signal for the design of the wafer that accounts for noise sources and imaging properties of the wafer metrology tool;

determine an edge placement uniformity signal that is a difference between the design-assisted composite signal and the simulated tool signal; and

analyze a shape and/or an area of the edge placement uniformity signal thereby determining placement of stochastics, wherein the shape and the area are caused by at least the stochastics.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the system is a scanning electron microscope.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine distribution of edge placement errors based on the shape.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to send instructions to inspect the wafer at locations with the edge placement errors using the particle beam.

17 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to compare the edge placement uniformity signal against a specification for the wafer.

18 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the particle beam is an electron beam, a photon beam, an ion beam, or a neutral particle beam.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 8, 2022
From: EYRING, STEFAN
To: KLA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061692/0826 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63328017 · Apr 6, 2022
Related Publication 20230326710A1 · Oct 12, 2023
References Cited (39)
US 7402257B1 · Sonderman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7434199B2 · Cobb et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7587704B2 · Ye et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7623978B2 · Lally · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 9404743B2 · Chiu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10185800B2 · Eyring et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10197908B2 · Sriraman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10474042B2 · Biafore et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10818001B2 · Leung · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10901325B2 · Gurevich et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11126090B2 · Hansen · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 12085385B2 · Eyring et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20040221255A1 · Pierrat et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090248341A1 · Tian et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20170016715A1 · Heidrich et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170082927A1 · Hsu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180173839A1 · Fang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200082523A1 · Leung et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200190667A1 · Shaikh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210043483A1 · Zhong et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210149312A1 · Tel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210382394A1 · Levinson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220042936A1 · Okai · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 110501870A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 112991268B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 20190054933A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW 201603158A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
TW 202212766A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020233950A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021016407A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022012888A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Fractilia, LLC, “New Stochastics Solution from Fractilia Enables Semiconductor EUV Fabs to Control Multi-Billion-Dollar Idustry Yield Problem,” Mar. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Eppler, “Controlling Uniformity at the Edge,” Semiconductor Engineering, Oct. 19, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Bhattacharyya, “Tough Road Ahead for Device Overlay and Edge Placement Error,” Proc of SPIE, 2019, 1095902-1 to 1095902-8. [cited by applicant]
Villarrubia et al., “3D Monto Carlo Modeling of the SEM: Are There Applications to Photomask Metrology,” Proc. of SPIE, 2014, 923602-1 to 923602-12. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2023/017003, Jul. 7, 2023. [cited by applicant]
WIPO, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2023/017003, Jul. 7, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Mack, C.A., Systematic errors in the measurement of power spectral density, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, Jul. 2013, vol. 12, No. 3, 033016, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Supplementary European Search Report issued for European Application No. 23785190, Nov. 18, 2025. [cited by applicant]