IP Library Granted Patent US 11,842,649
Granted Patent B2
US 11,842,649 · App. 17/972,109 · Granted Dec 12, 2023

Supervisory safety system for controlling and limiting unmanned aerial system (UAS) operations

Inventors: Andrew Joseph Thurling (Simi Valley, CA); Joseph Frank Mohos (Burbank, CA)
Assignee: AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
G08G5/006G08G5/0013G08G5/0021G08G5/0069
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,842,649
App. No.
17/972,109
Granted
Dec 12, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems, devices, and methods for determining, by a processor, an unmanned aerial system (UAS) position relative to at least one flight boundary; and effecting, by the processor, at least one flight limitation of a UAS if the determined UAS position crosses the at least one flight boundary.

Claims (53)

1. A method comprising:

determining, by a processor of a flight limiting device (FLD) having addressable memory, a three-dimensional position of an unmanned aerial system (UAS) relative to at least one flight boundary encompassing a prohibited flight area;

determining, by the processor of the FLD, an error in a trajectory of the UAS that will cross the at least one flight boundary within a set time, wherein the error is determined based on the determined three-dimensional position of the UAS; and

effecting, by the processor of the FLD, at least one flight limitation based on the determined error in the trajectory, wherein the effected at least one flight limitation prevents the UAS from entering the prohibited flight area.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

attaching the FLD to the UAS.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the FLD is detachably attached to the UAS.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the UAS has an operational reliability of at least 1*10 −7 of preventing the UAS from crossing the at least one flight boundary when the FLD is detachably attached to the UAS.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the UAS has a lower operational reliability when the FLD is detached from the UAS.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the FLD processor, the UAS position relative to at least one user defined flight boundary; and

effecting, by the processor of the FLD, at least one flight limitation of the UAS if the determined UAS position crosses the at least one user defined flight boundary;

wherein the at least one user defined flight boundary is smaller than the prohibited flight area.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving an input, by the processor of the FLD, from a sense and avoid system of at least one object that could interfere with the UAS;

generating, by the processor of the FLD, at least one flight boundary based on the received input from the sense and avoid system; and

effecting, by the processor of the FLD, at least one flight limitation of the UAS if the UAS position crosses the at least one generated flight boundary.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flight boundary is updated by a user from a third-party database prior to a flight.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flight boundary is updated during the flight of the UAS by at least one of: a sense and avoid system and a third-party database.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the processor of the FLD, whether the determined three-dimensional position of the UAS has crossed a first flight boundary; and

sending, by the processor of the FLD, a warning to a user when the first flight boundary is crossed by the UAS.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein a flight limitation of the at least one flight limitation comprises: grounding the UAS; deploying a parachute; separating one or more components of the UAS; an explosive charge; reversing a throttle to one or more propulsion devices of the UAS; and actuating an actuator to maintain the UAS in a circular flight pattern, wherein the circular flight pattern does not cross the at least one flight boundary, and wherein the circular flight pattern maintains the UAS outside of the prohibited flight area.

12. A system comprising:

a highly reliable flight limiting device (FLD) configured to be detachably attached to a low operational reliability unmanned aerial system (UAS), the FLD comprising:

a FLD processor having addressable memory, the FLD processor configured to:

determine a three-dimensional position of the UAS relative to at least one flight boundary encompassing a prohibited flight area;

determine an error in a trajectory of the UAS that will cross the at least one flight boundary within a set time, wherein the error is determined based on the determined three-dimensional position of the UAS; and

effect at least one flight limitation of the UAS based on the determined error in the trajectory, wherein the effected at least one flight limitation prevents the UAS from entering the prohibited flight area.

13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

the low operational reliability UAS comprising a UAS processor with addressable memory.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the UAS has an operational reliability of at least 1*10 −7 of preventing the UAS from crossing at least one flight boundary when the FLD is detachably attached to the UAS, and wherein the UAS has a lower operational reliability when the FLD is detached from the UAS.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the UAS further comprises:

a UAS navigation device;

a UAS radio; and

at least one UAS propulsion device; and

a UAS power source;

wherein the FLD is in communication with the UAS controller to effect the at least one flight limitation.

16. The system of claim 15 further comprising:

a UAS operator controller comprising:

a UAS operator controller processor having addressable memory, the UAS controller processor configured to:

receive a status of the UAS, wherein the status includes data on at least one of: the UAS power source, the UAS controller, the UAS navigation device, the UAS radio, and the at least one UAS propulsion device; and

receive a warning if the determined UAS position crosses the at least one flight boundary.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein the UAS navigation device further comprises a global positioning system (GPS), an inertial measurement unit (IMU), and an altimeter, wherein the UAS radio comprises a transceiver, and wherein the processor of the FLD is configured to receive an input from at least one of: the UAS power source, the UAS controller, the UAS navigation device, the UAS radio, and the at least one UAS propulsion device.

18. The system of claim 15 , wherein the at least one flight limitation of the UAS comprises an actuation of an actuator to maintain the UAS in a circular flight pattern, wherein the circular flight pattern does not cross the at least one flight boundary, and wherein the circular flight pattern maintains the UAS outside of the prohibited flight area.

19. A method comprising:

attaching a highly reliable flight limiting device (FLD) to a first low operational reliability unmanned aerial system (UAS) having a processor and addressable memory, wherein the highly reliable FLD is detachably attached to the first UAS;

detaching the highly reliable FLD from the first UAS, wherein the first UAS has a lower operational reliability when the highly reliable FLD is detached from the first UAS;

attaching the highly reliable FLD to a second low operational reliability UAS having a processor and addressable memory, wherein the highly reliable FLD is detachably attached to the second UAS;

determining, by a processor of the highly reliable FLD having an addressable memory, a three-dimensional position of the highly reliable FLD relative to the at least one flight boundary encompassing a prohibited flight area;

determining, by the processor of the highly reliable FLD, an error in a trajectory of the second UAS that will cross the at least one flight boundary within a set time, wherein the error is determined based on the determined three-dimensional position of the FLD; and

effecting, by the processor of the highly reliable FLD, at least one flight limitation based on the determined error in the trajectory, wherein the effected at least one flight limitation prevents the second UAS from entering the prohibited flight area.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first UAS has an operational reliability of at least 1*10 −7 of preventing the first UAS from crossing at least one flight boundary when the FLD is detachably attached to the first UAS, wherein the second UAS has an operational reliability of at least 1*10 −7 of preventing the second UAS from crossing the at least one flight boundary when the highly reliable FLD is detachably attached to the second UAS, and wherein the second UAS has a lower operational reliability when the highly reliable FLD is detached from the second UAS.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 069113/0683 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 24, 2022
From: THURLING, ANDREW JOSEPH; MOHOS, JOSEPH FRANK
To: AEROVIRONMENT, INC.
Reel/Frame 061516/0469 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16747850 · Jan 21, 2020
Continuation 14974259 · Dec 18, 2015
Provisional Application 62094798 · Dec 19, 2014
Related Publication 20230055318A1 · Feb 23, 2023