IP Library Granted Patent US 12,558,569
Granted Patent B2
US 12,558,569 · App. 17/972,420 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Sequential monoscopic tracking

Inventors: Sohail Sayeh (San Ramon, CA); Eric Schnarr (McFarland, WI); Petr Jordan (Redwood City, CA); Calvin R. Maurer, Jr. (San Jose, CA); Jay B. West (Mountain View, CA); Robert O'Connell (Madison, WI)
Assignee: Accuray LLC
A61N5/1049A61B6/5264A61B90/39A61N5/1067A61N5/107G06T7/33G06T7/73G06T7/75G06T7/97G16H20/40G16H30/40G16H40/63A61B6/032A61B6/0487A61B6/12A61B6/4014A61B6/4085A61B6/4441A61B2034/2046A61B2034/2055A61B2034/2065A61B2090/367A61B2090/3983A61N2005/1051A61N2005/1061A61N2005/1091G06T2207/10024G06T2207/10081G06T2207/10116G06T2207/30004G06T2207/30204
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,558,569
App. No.
17/972,420
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of sequential monoscopic tracking is described. The method includes generating a plurality of projections of an internal target region within a body of a patient, the plurality of projections comprising projection data about a position of an internal target region of the patient. The method further includes generating external positional data about external motion of the body of the patient using one or more external sensors. The method further includes generating, by a processing device, a correlation model between the projection data and the external positional data by fitting the plurality of projections of the internal target region to the external positional data. The method further includes estimating the position of the internal target region at a later time using the correlation model.

Claims (53)

1 . A method, comprising:

generating a plurality of two dimensional projections of an internal target region within a body of a patient, the plurality of two dimensional projections comprising projection data about a position of an internal target region of the patient, wherein each of the plurality of two dimensional projections are generated sequentially at different points in time;

generating external positional data about external motion of the body of the patient using one or more external sensors;

generating, by a processing device of a radiation treatment delivery system, a correlation model between the external positional data and the position of the internal target region by directly fitting, in two dimensions, each of the plurality of two dimensional projections of the internal target region to the external positional data, wherein directly fitting includes optimizing parameters of an analytic function to best fit three dimensional modeled positions of the internal target region to the projection data of the plurality of two-dimensional projections and the external positional data; and

estimating the position of the internal target region at a later time using the correlation model.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the two dimensional projections of the plurality of two dimensional projections comprise sequentially acquired monoscopic projection images acquired using an imager rotated on a gantry.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of two dimensional projections of the internal target region comprises sequentially acquiring a plurality of two dimensional x-ray images of the internal target region using a single imager on a rotating gantry by rotating the single imager around the internal target, wherein each of the plurality of two dimensional x-ray images are acquired sequentially at different points in time.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of two dimensional projections are x-ray images.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the position of the internal target region comprises a three dimensional position.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the position of the internal target region identifies internal motion of the body of the patient, the internal motion comprising motion of one or more implanted fiducial markers.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling the radiation treatment delivery system based on the correlation model by directing a radiation treatment beam generated by a linear accelerator (LINAC) based on the correlation model.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling the radiation treatment delivery system based on the correlation model by controlling a collimator of a linear accelerator (LINAC) based on the correlation model.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the collimator is a multi-leaf collimator and to control the collimator, the method comprising moving one or more leaves of the multi-leaf collimator.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein controlling the radiation treatment delivery system based on the correlation model further comprises controlling a treatment couch.

11 . The method of claim 8 , wherein to control the radiation treatment delivery system based on the correlation model, the method further comprising: gating a radiation treatment beam generated by a linear accelerator (LINAC) based on the correlation model.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the projection data corresponds to one or more fiducial markers located near the internal target region, wherein to generate the correlation model the method further comprises computing a deformation state of the internal target region based on relative positions of the one or more fiducial markers.

13 . A radiation treatment delivery apparatus, comprising:

a first detection device to generate two-dimensional projection data about a position of a target region internal to a body of a patient, wherein the two dimensional projection data is generated sequentially at different points in time;

a second detection device to generate positional data about one or more sensors external to the body of the patient; and

a processing device to

receive the two-dimensional projection data about the internal target region and the positional data from the external sensors and generate a correlation model between the positional data and the position of the target region by directly fitting, in two dimensions, the two-dimensional projection data to the positional data, wherein directly fitting includes optimizing parameters of an analytic function to best fit three dimensional modeled positions of the internal target region to the two-dimensional projection data and the positional data, and

control the radiation treatment delivery apparatus using the correlation model and based on the positional data obtained from the external sensors to compensate for motions of the patient.

14 . The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the first detection device comprises a rotatable single imager.

15 . The apparatus of claim 14 , further comprising a linear accelerator (LINAC) comprising an onboard kilovoltage (kV) imager coupled to a gantry, wherein the first detection device is coupled to the gantry.

16 . The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the first detection device is configured to:

generate a plurality of sequential images; and

generate a single projection based on the plurality of sequential images.

17 . The apparatus of claim 13 , further comprising a linear accelerator (LINAC) coupled to a moveable stage, wherein the first detection device comprises a cone-beam CT (CBCT) imager coupled to a gantry.

18 . The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the moveable stage is the gantry.

19 . The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the moveable stage is separate from the gantry.

20 . The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the correlation model is generated during acquisition of a CBCT scan.

21 . The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the first detection device comprises a mega-volt portal imager.

22 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processing device of a radiation treatment delivery system, cause the processing device to:

generate a plurality of two dimensional projections of an internal target region within a body of a patient, the plurality of two dimensional projections comprising projection data about a position of an internal target region of the patient, wherein each of the plurality of two dimensional projections are generated sequentially at different points in time;

generate external positional data about external motion of the body of the patient using one or more external sensors;

generate, by the processing device, a correlation model between the projection data and the external positional data by directly fitting, in two dimensions, each of the plurality of two dimensional projections of the internal target region to the external positional data, wherein directly fitting includes optimizing parameters of an analytic function to best fit three dimensional modeled positions of the internal target region to the projection data of the plurality of two dimensional projections and the external positional data; and

estimate a position of the internal target region at a later time using the correlation model.

23 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein each of the two dimensional projections of the plurality of two dimensional projections comprise sequentially acquired monoscopic projection images acquired using an imager rotated on a gantry.

24 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein the plurality of two dimensional projections are x-ray images.

25 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein the projection data identifies internal motion of the body of the patient, the internal motion comprising motion of the internal target region.

26 . The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 22 , wherein the position of the internal target region identifies internal motion of the body of the patient, the internal motion comprising motion of one or more implanted fiducial markers.

27 . A method, comprising:

sequentially acquiring a plurality of two dimensional x-ray images of a target within a body of a patient using a single imager on a rotating gantry by rotating the single imager around the target;

generating external positional data about external motion of the body of the patient using one or more external sensors; and

determining, by a processing device, a three dimensional internal position of the target using a correlation model generated by directly fitting, in two dimensions, each of the sequentially acquired plurality of two dimensional x-ray images of the target to the external positional data, wherein directly fitting includes optimizing parameters of an analytic function to best fit three dimensional modeled positions of the target to projection data of the plurality of two dimensional x-ray images and the external positional data.

28 . The method of claim 27 , further comprising controlling a radiation treatment delivery system based on the three dimensional internal position of the target.

29 . A method, comprising:

generating target positional data about a three dimensional internal target position being internal to a body of a patient, by generating a plurality of two dimensional projections of the three dimensional internal target position, wherein each of the plurality of two dimensional projections are generated sequentially at different points in time;

generating external positional data about external motion of the body of the patient using one or more external sensors, wherein the external positional data is generated more frequently than the plurality of two dimensional projections; and

generating, by a processing device, a correlation model between the external positional data and the three dimensional internal target position by directly fitting, in two dimensions, each of the plurality of two-dimensional projections of the three dimensional internal target position to the external positional data, wherein directly fitting includes optimizing parameters of an analytic function to best fit three dimensional modeled positions of the three dimensional internal target to projection data of the plurality of two-dimensional projections and the external positional data; and

controlling a treatment delivery system to direct radiation towards the three dimensional internal target position of the patient based on the correlation model to compensate for motions of the patient.

30 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the target positional data corresponds to one or more fiducial markers located near the three dimensional internal target position, wherein generating the correlation model comprises computing a deformation state of the three dimensional internal target position based on relative positions of the one or more fiducial markers.

31 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the plurality of two dimensional projections are x-ray images.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2025
From: ACCURAY INCORPORATED
To: ACCURAY LLC
Reel/Frame 072494/0695 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2022
From: SAYEH, SOHAIL; SCHNARR, ERIC; JORDAN, PETR; MAURER, CALVIN R., JR.; WEST, JAY B.; O'CONNELL, ROBERT
To: ACCURAY INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 061599/0025 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15945580 · Apr 4, 2018
Provisional Application 62482604 · Apr 6, 2017
Provisional Application 62482135 · Apr 5, 2017
Related Publication 20230044983A1 · Feb 9, 2023
References Cited (121)
US 4132896A · Klotz et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4237901A · Taenzer · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4249106A · Maruyama et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4583538A · Onik et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4791934A · Brunnett · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5067981A · Hooykaas · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5207223A · Adler et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5222499A · Allen et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5278886A · Kobiki et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5394875A · Lewis et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5397329A · Allen · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5411026A · Carol · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5427097A · Depp · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5430308A · Feichtner et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5446548A · Gerig et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5447154A · Cinquin et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5537452A · Shepherd et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5538494A · Matsuda · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5588430A · Bova et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5622187A · Carol · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5628315A · Vilsmeier et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5727554A · Kalend et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5748700A · Shepherd et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5764723A · Weinberger et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5769861A · Vilsmeier · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5784431A · Kalend et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5797849A · Vesely et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5943719A · Feldman et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5967981A · Watrous · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5971997A · Guthrie et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6006126A · Cosman · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6019724A · Gronningsaeter et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6031888A · Ivan et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6076005A · Sontag et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6110112A · Heywang-Koebrunner · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6120453A · Sharp · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6144875A · Schweikard et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6149592A · Yanof et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6219403B1 · Nishihara · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6246898B1 · Vesely et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6256372B1 · Aufrichtig et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6275721B1 · Darrow et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6285902B1 · Kienzle, III et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6301495B1 · Gueziec et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6307914B1 · Kunieda et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6314312B1 · Wessels et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6325758B1 · Carol et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6380958B1 · Guendel et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6405072B1 · Cosman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6470207B1 · Simon et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6473634B1 · Barni · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6501981B1 · Schweikard · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 6681129B2 · Matsuzaki et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6690965B1 · Riaziat et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6778850B1 · Adler et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7318805B2 · Schweikard et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8634898B2 · Adler et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20020032453A1 · Cosman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020065461A1 · Cosman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020154728A1 · Morita et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20080130825A1 · Fu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090180678A1 · Kuduvalli · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100172469A1 · Poulsen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100188027A1 · Treas et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110235860A1 · Keall et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301449A1 · Maurer, Jr. · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120008734A1 · Thomson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120008735A1 · Maurer · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120078090A1 · Adler · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120106704A1 · Maurer, Jr. et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120150520A1 · Vaillant et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150243025A1 · Berlinger et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150359504A1 · Zhou et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170368369A1 · Heinrich et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 101501704A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 103889139A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 1004272A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 62206798A · 1987 [cited by applicant]
JP 05188199A · 1993 [cited by applicant]
JP 06181918A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 10201863A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 11019082A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000201922A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000217810A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2000237335A · 2000 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003523220A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013544137A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 6502330B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 9206644A1 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO 9740766A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 0007669A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 0054689A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008021245A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008057166A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011156526A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012058615A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013169814A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017093034A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Brain Waves “Dynamic IMRS Intensity Modulated Radiosurgery”, BrainLAB AG, Summer 2000; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brain Waves “Novalis Body”, BrainLAB AG, Summer 2001; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schnarr et al. “Feasability of real-time motion management with helical tomotherapy”, Accuray Incorporated study, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
English Abstract JP8112272 published May 7, 1996, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for Japanese Patent Application 2002-526277, Sep. 22, 2006, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for Japanese Patent Application 2002-526277, May 18, 2006, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for Japanese Patent Application 2002-526277, Apr. 19, 2007, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007 212216, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for Japanese Patent Application No. 2007 212216, mailed Mar. 2, 2010, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 970 945.0, dated Feb. 23, 2010, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 970 945.0, dated Jan. 16, 2007, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplementary European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 01 970 945.0 dated Apr. 5, 2006, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplementary European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 01 970 945.0 Oct. 16, 2006, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplementary Partial European Search Report, Application No. EP01970945, mailed Jun. 28, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Coste-Maniere, E., (2005). “Robotic Whole Body Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Clinical Advantages of the CyberKnife® Integrated System,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics + Computer Assisted Surgery, www. roboti… [cited by applicant]
Minohara, S. et al. (Jul. 2000). “Respiratory Gated Irridation System for Heavy-Ion Radiotherapy,” International Journal of Radiation: Oncology Biology Physics, Pergamon Press, US vol. 47, No. 4, ISSN-0360-3016. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action and Search Report on the Patentability of Application No. 2019-554795 Mailed Dec. 1, 2021, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion of the ISA/EP in PCT/US2018/026323 dated Jul. 5, 2018; 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Cho, Byungchul et al. “A monoscopic method for real-time tumour tracking using combined occasional x-ray imaging and continuous respiratory monitoring”, Physics in Medicine & Biology, vol. 53, No. 11, published May 6, 2… [cited by applicant]
First Office Action from the China National Intellectual Property Administration from related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880032621.4 mailed on Mar. 17, 2023, 26 pages including translation. [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action from the China National Intellectual Property Administration from related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880032621.4 mailed on Sep. 19, 2023, 11 pages including translation. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from the European Patent Office from related European Patent Application No. 18720709.7, mailed on May 2, 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Decision of Final Rejection from the Japan Patent Office from related Japanese Patent Application No. 2019-554795, mailed on Sep. 5, 2022, 9 pages including translation. [cited by applicant]