IP Library Granted Patent US 12,399,490
Granted Patent B2
US 12,399,490 · App. 17/977,315 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Performance monitoring and control system for connected building equipment with stability index

Inventors: Steven R. Vitullo (Milwaukee, WI); Kelsey C. Schuster (Wauwatosa, WI); Michael R. Rhodes (Shorewood, WI); Jonathan Cox (St. Peters, MO); Riley P. Shelton (Oak Creek, WI); John F. Kuchler (Muskego, WI)
Assignee: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
G05B23/0283G05B17/02G05B23/0221G05B23/0235G05B23/0264G05B2219/2642
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,399,490
App. No.
17/977,315
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes obtaining an actual value of a condition affected by operating the building equipment, operating the building equipment using a setpoint for the condition, calculating a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between the actual value and the setpoint, comparing the stability index to a criterion, in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion, executing an action relating to the building equipment, and in response to the stability index not satisfying the criterion, not executing the action.

Claims (36)

1. A method for monitoring and controlling building equipment, comprising:

obtaining an actual value of a condition affected by operating the building equipment;

operating the building equipment using a setpoint for the condition;

calculating a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between the actual value and the setpoint;

comparing the stability index to a criterion; and

in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion, modifying an operation of the building equipment and operating the building equipment in accordance with the modified operation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the condition comprises at least one of temperature. humidity, pressure, flow rate, light level, or noise level.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the stability index comprises calculating a sum of a plurality of trapezoidal areas having sides corresponding to the timeseries of errors.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein comprising performing a fault detection or diagnostic procedure for the building equipment in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying the operation comprises modifying a predictive control strategy for the building equipment and wherein operating the building equipment in accordance with the modified operation comprises operating the building equipment in accordance with the modified predictive control strategy.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the building equipment comprises a chiller and the method comprises calculating a chiller performance index.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the stability index to the criterion comprises determining whether the stability index is greater than a predefined threshold.

8. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing program instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

obtaining an actual value of a condition affected by operating building equipment;

operating the building equipment using a setpoint for the condition;

calculating a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between the actual value and the setpoint;

comparing the stability index to a criterion; and

in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion, modifying an operation of the building equipment and operating the building equipment in accordance with the modified operation.

9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein the condition comprises at least one of temperature, humidity, pressure, or flowrate.

10. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein calculating the stability index comprises calculating a sum of a plurality of trapezoidal areas defined by the timeseries of errors.

11. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein the operations comprise performing a fault detection or diagnostic procedure for the building equipment based on the stability index.

12. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein modifying the operation of the building equipment comprises modifying a control strategy for the building equipment and operating the building equipment in accordance with the modified operation comprises operating the building equipment using the modified control strategy.

13. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein the building equipment comprises a chiller and the operations comprise calculating a chiller performance index.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 8 , wherein comparing the stability index to the criterion comprises determining whether the stability index is greater than a predefined threshold.

15. A building management system, comprising:

building equipment operable to affect a condition of a building based on a setpoint for the condition;

a sensor configured to measure an actual value of the condition of the building;

a computing resource configured to:

calculate a stability index based on a timeseries of errors between the actual value and the setpoint;

compare the stability index to a criterion; and

in response to the stability index satisfying the criterion, modify an operation of the building equipment and operate the building equipment in accordance with the modified operation.

16. The building management system of claim 15 , wherein the condition is humidity, pressure, or flowrate.

17. The building management system of claim 15 , wherein the computing resource is configured to calculate the stability index by calculating a sum of a plurality of trapezoidal areas defined by the timeseries of errors.

18. The building management system of claim 15 , wherein the computing resource is configured to perform a fault detection or diagnostic procedure for the building equipment based on the stability index.

19. The building management system of claim 15 , wherein the computing resource is configured to modify the operation of the building equipment by modifying a predictive control strategy for the building equipment.

20. The building management system of claim 15 , wherein the computing resource is configured to compare the stability index to the criterion by determining whether the stability index is less than a predefined threshold.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2024
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 067056/0552 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2022
From: VITULLO, STEVEN R.; SCHUSTER, KELSEY C.; RHODES, MICHAEL R.; COX, JONATHAN; SHELTON, RILEY P.; KUCHLER, JOHN F.
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 061845/0868 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation In Part 17400950 · Aug 12, 2021
Continuation In Part 17028704 · Sep 22, 2020
Continuation 16245122 · Jan 10, 2019
Provisional Application 63298720 · Jan 12, 2022
Related Publication 20230047122A1 · Feb 16, 2023
References Cited (34)
US 4873649A · Grald · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 5083438A · McMullin · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 10257052B1 · Nborg et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10290025B1 · Howes · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10378794B2 · Togano et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11092954B2 · Vitullo et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11493913B2 · Shukla et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20060144057A1 · You et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090140060A1 · Stoner · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090210081A1 · Sustaeta et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120259583A1 · Noboa · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130098084A1 · Matsuo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150167999A1 · Seem et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178865A1 · Anderson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150316907A1 · Elbsat et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160057029A1 · Iida et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160061693A1 · Salsbury et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160334122A1 · Shiel · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170276571A1 · Vitullo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170293293A1 · Brownie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170309094A1 · Farahat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170366414A1 · Hamilton et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180039292A1 · van Berkel · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180046151A1 · Ahmed · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180087790A1 · Perez · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373234A1 · Khalate et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190086108A1 · Okita · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190245223A1 · Kügele · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190293313A1 · Reeve et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293318A1 · Reeve et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190338972A1 · Schuster et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019129A1 · Sircar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Al-Sharafi et al., “Overall performance index for hybrid power plants,” Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, vol. 100 (pp. 103-116). [cited by applicant]
Johnson Controls York, “Model YK (Style H) R-134a with OptiviewTM Control Center for Electro-Mechanical Starter, Solid State Starter and Variable Speed Drive,” Jun. 15, 2015, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]