IP Library Granted Patent US 12,340,329
Granted Patent B2
US 12,340,329 · App. 17/992,652 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Multi-platform prescription routing system

Inventors: Timothy Rourke (San Diego, CA); William J. Barre (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.
G06Q10/06315G06Q10/10G06Q30/0206G06Q40/08G16H10/60G16H20/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,340,329
App. No.
17/992,652
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for a multi-platform prescription routing system in a network are provided. The system includes a network interface communicatively coupled to a computer network, the network interface including a receiver and a transmitter. The system includes at least one processor communicatively coupled to the network interface. The processor is configured to transmit the first prescription to the first supplier, and the second prescription to the second supplier for fulfillment. The processor is further configured to receive, via the network interface, status updates from the one or more suppliers. The processor is further configured to transmit, via the network interface, the status updates to the at least one user device in a format through which the status updates from the first supplier and the second supplier are together viewable by the patient within a single user interface at the user device.

Claims (61)

1. A system for a prescription benefit manager configured to route and receive electronics prescription information across multiple platforms, the system comprising:

a network interface communicatively coupled to a computer network, the network interface including a receiver and a transmitter, the receiver configured to demodulate data received from the computer network including a plurality of prescriptions for a patient from at least one mobile user device, and the transmitter configured to transmit the plurality of prescriptions to a set of certified suppliers for fulfillment, wherein at least two of the set of certified suppliers are communicatively coupled to the network interface and are each selected to fill one or more of the plurality of prescriptions; and

at least one processor communicatively coupled to the network interface, the at least one processor configured for:

receiving, via the network interface, the plurality of prescriptions for the patient from the at least one mobile user device, the plurality of prescriptions identifying the patient and a prescribed treatment;

applying, based on the plurality of prescriptions, a supplier selection criteria to select at least a first supplier and a second supplier from the set of certified suppliers, the first supplier being selected to fill a first prescription according to provisions of a prescription plan associated with the patient, and the second supplier being selected to fill a second prescription according to the provisions of the prescription plan associated with the patient, the first supplier being associated with a first system that does not share information with a second system of the second supplier;

transmitting, via the network interface, the first prescription to the first supplier, and the second prescription to the second supplier for fulfillment;

receiving, via the network interface, status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier, wherein the status updates include at least one of prescription receipt confirmation, fulfillment confirmation, and shipment confirmation from each of the first supplier and the second supplier; and

transmitting, via the network interface, a single generated graphical mobile application interface having a format through which the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier are together viewable simultaneously by the patient at the mobile user device, the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier being viewable from a single page at the single generated graphical mobile application interface, the single generated graphical mobile application interface configured to display the status updates prior to a selection to interact, via a portal having a mobile application dashboard, with content related to the status updates from at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, the status updates being selectable and accessible on the single page to interact, via the portal having the mobile application dashboard, with the content stored at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, the portal having the mobile application dashboard configured to facilitate access between the mobile user device and at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first supplier and the second supplier are selected to fulfill the plurality of prescriptions for the patient in a most effective manner with respect to at least one of costs, quality, and fulfillment speed as covered by the prescription plan associated with the patient.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured for:

calculating a copayment price owed by the patient for each of the plurality of prescriptions;

accessing, via the network interface, account information for a financial account of the patient from a database;

deducting, via the network interface, the copayment price from the financial account; and

transmitting, via the network interface, a payment to the first supplier and the second supplier.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured for:

identifying the patient from each of the plurality of prescriptions;

searching, via the network interface, a first database to identify the prescription plan to which the patient belongs; and

searching, via the network interface, a second database to identify the supplier selection criteria associated with the prescription plan,

wherein selecting the supplier selection criteria to apply to the plurality of prescriptions includes selecting the identified supplier selection criteria associated with the prescription plan.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein applying the supplier selection criteria comprises evaluating the set of certified suppliers and selecting the first supplier and the second supplier based on total price of adjudication.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein applying the supplier selection criteria comprises evaluating the set of certified suppliers and selecting the first supplier and the second supplier based on a combination of total price of adjudication, performance rating, and ancillary service offerings.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the set of certified suppliers include suppliers that meet a minimum level of service requirements and have integrated into a healthcare needs fulfillment system.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first supplier and the second supplier may be selected from pharmacy, a provider of vitamins and nutritional supplements, a provider of durable medical equipment, or a provider of disposable medical supplies.

9. A non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving, via a network interface communicatively coupled to a computer network, a plurality of prescriptions for a patient from at least one mobile user device, the plurality of prescriptions identifying the patient and a prescribed treatment, the network interface including a receiver and a transmitter, the receiver configured to demodulate data received from the computer network including the plurality of prescriptions for the patient from the at least one mobile user device, and the transmitter configured to transmit the plurality of prescriptions to a set of certified suppliers for fulfillment, wherein at least two of the set of certified suppliers are communicatively coupled to the network interface and are each selected to fill one or more of the plurality of prescriptions;

applying, based on the plurality of prescriptions, a supplier selection criteria to select at least a first supplier and a second supplier from the set of certified suppliers, the first supplier being selected to fill a first prescription according to provisions of a prescription plan associated with the patient, and the second supplier being selected to fill a second prescription according to the provisions of the prescription plan associated with the patient, the first supplier being associated with a first system that does not share information with a second system of the second supplier;

transmitting, via the network interface, the first prescription to the first supplier, and the second prescription to the second supplier for fulfillment;

receiving, via the network interface, status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier, wherein the status updates include at least one of prescription receipt confirmation, fulfillment confirmation, and shipment confirmation from each of the first supplier and the second supplier; and

transmitting, via the network interface, a single generated graphical mobile application interface having a format through which the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier are together viewable simultaneously by the patient at the mobile user device, the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier being viewable from a single page at the single generated graphical mobile application interface, the single generated graphical mobile application interface configured to display the status updates prior to a selection to interact, via a portal having a mobile application dashboard, with content related to the status updates from at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, the status updates being selectable and accessible on the single page to interact, via the portal having the mobile application dashboard, with the content stored at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, , the portal having the mobile application dashboard configured to facilitate access between the mobile user device and at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier.

10. The non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions of claim 9 , wherein the first supplier and the second supplier are selected to fulfill the plurality of prescriptions for the patient in a most effective manner with respect to at least one of costs, quality, and fulfillment speed as covered by the prescription plan associated with the patient.

11. The non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise:

calculating a copayment price owed by the patient for each of the plurality of prescriptions;

accessing, via the network interface, account information for a financial account of the patient from a database; and

deducting, via the network interface, the copayment price from the financial account; and

transmitting, via the network interface, a payment to the first supplier and the second supplier.

12. The non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise:

identifying the patient from each of the plurality of prescriptions;

searching, via the network interface, a first database to identify the prescription plan to which the patient belongs; and

searching, via the network interface, a second database to identify the supplier selection criteria associated with the prescription plan,

wherein selecting the supplier selection criteria to apply to the plurality of prescriptions includes selecting the supplier selection criteria associated with the prescription plan.

13. The non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions of claim 9 , wherein applying the supplier selection criteria comprises evaluating the set of certified suppliers and selecting the first supplier and the second supplier based on a combination of total price of adjudication, performance rating, and ancillary service offerings.

14. The non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions of claim 9 , wherein the set of certified suppliers include suppliers that meet a minimum level of service requirements and have integrated into a healthcare needs fulfillment system.

15. A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, using at least one processor and via a network interface communicatively coupled to a computer network, a plurality of prescriptions for a patient from at least one mobile user device, the plurality of prescriptions identifying the patient and a prescribed treatment, the network interface including a receiver and a transmitter, the receiver configured to demodulate data received from the computer network including the plurality of prescriptions for the patient from the at least one mobile user device, and the transmitter configured to transmit the plurality of prescriptions to a set of certified suppliers for fulfillment, wherein at least two of the set of certified suppliers are communicatively coupled to the network interface and are each selected to fill one or more of the plurality of prescriptions;

applying, using the at least one processor and based on the plurality of prescriptions, a supplier selection criteria to select at least a first supplier and a second supplier from the set of certified suppliers, the first supplier being selected to fill a first prescription according to provisions of a prescription plan associated with the patient, and the second supplier being selected to fill a second prescription according to the provisions of the prescription plan associated with the patient, the first supplier being associated with a first system that does not share information with a second system of the second supplier;

transmitting, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, the first prescription to the first supplier, and the second prescription to the second supplier for fulfillment;

receiving, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier, wherein the status updates include at least one of prescription receipt confirmation, fulfillment confirmation, and shipment confirmation from each of the first supplier and the second supplier; and

transmitting, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, a single generated graphical mobile application interface having a format through which the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier are together viewable simultaneously by the patient at the mobile user device, the status updates from the first system of the first supplier and the second system of the second supplier being viewable from a single page at the single generated graphical mobile application interface, the single generated graphical mobile application interface configured to display the status updates prior to a selection to interact, via a portal having a mobile application dashboard, with content related to the status updates from at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, the status updates being selectable and accessible on the single page to interact, via the portal having the mobile application dashboard, with the content stored at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier, the portal having the mobile application dashboard configured to facilitate access between the mobile user device and at least one of the first system of the first supplier or the second system of the second supplier.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein the first supplier and the second supplier are selected to fulfill the plurality of prescriptions for the patient in a most effective manner with respect to at least one of costs, quality, and fulfillment speed as covered by the prescription plan associated with the patient.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , further comprising:

calculating, using the at least one processor, a copayment price owed by the patient for each of the plurality of prescriptions;

accessing, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, account information for a financial account of the patient from a database;

deducting, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, the copayment price from the financial account; and

transmitting, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, a payment to the first supplier and the second supplier.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , further comprising:

identifying, using the at least one processor, the patient from each of the plurality of prescriptions;

searching, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, a first database to identify the prescription plan to which the patient belongs; and

searching, using the at least one processor and via the network interface, a second database to identify the supplier selection criteria associated with the prescription plan,

wherein selecting the supplier selection criteria to apply to the plurality of prescriptions includes selecting the selection criteria associated with the prescription plan.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein applying the supplier selection criteria comprises evaluating the set of certified suppliers and selecting the first supplier and the second supplier based on total price of adjudication.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein applying the supplier selection criteria comprises evaluating the set of certified suppliers and selecting the first supplier and the second supplier based on a combination of total price of adjudication, performance rating, and ancillary service offerings.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 13, 2025
From: ROURKE, TIMOTHY; BARRE, WILLIAM J.
To: MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 070507/0948 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2025
From: MEDIMPACT HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.
To: TRUIST BANK, AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 070197/0442 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16159471 · Oct 12, 2018
Continuation 14776614
Provisional Application 61786076 · Mar 14, 2013
Related Publication 20240170119A1 · May 23, 2024
References Cited (130)
US 5301105A · Cummings, Jr. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5704044A · Tarter et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5737539A · Edelson et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5845255A · Mayaud · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6108635A · Herren et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6195612B1 · Pack-Harris · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6283761B1 · Joao · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6341265B1 · Provost et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7165077B2 · Kalies, Jr. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7412396B1 · Haq · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7490047B2 · Brown et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7505917B2 · Howe et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7685026B1 · McGrady et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7769601B1 · Bleser et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7840424B2 · Wiley et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7949580B1 · Boyer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8060379B1 · Pinsonneault et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8069059B2 · Howe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8099295B2 · Virdee et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8265950B2 · Howe et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8346571B2 · Kalies, Jr. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8433587B1 · Cullen · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8447628B2 · Kalies, Jr. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8788282B2 · Watanabe · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8844803B2 · Utech · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20010037216A1 · Oscar et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020002495A1 · Ullman · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020049617A1 · Lencki et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020082863A1 · Kleinke · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020095316A1 · Toan et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111832A1 · Judge · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020120473A1 · Wiggins · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020147617A1 · Schoenbaum et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020169727A1 · Melnick et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020183965A1 · Gogolak · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030154106A1 · Marks · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030195771A1 · Fitzgerald et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040039604A1 · Tallal, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040054685A1 · Rahn et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040073457A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040122713A1 · Hill et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040133452A1 · Denny et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040143171A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040143594A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040148194A1 · Wellons et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040148195A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040148196A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040148198A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040148498A1 · Circenis et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040230502A1 · Fiacco et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050060188A1 · Valley · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050065821A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050071193A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050071200A1 · Franklin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050240442A1 · Lapsker · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050251429A1 · Ammer et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050261939A1 · Augspurger et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050283259A1 · Wolpow · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060020514A1 · Yered · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060116905A1 · Yered · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060129357A1 · Francis et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060178915A1 · Chao · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060182705A1 · Cruse · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060184391A1 · Barre et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060271402A1 · Rowe et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070011025A1 · Cracchiolo et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070025031A1 · Kwon · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070050210A1 · Wiley, II · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070106623A1 · Melnick et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233516A1 · Howe et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233526A1 · Hoffman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070250341A1 · Howe et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080183492A1 · Warren et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080228519A1 · Leon · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080312956A1 · Momita et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090076868A1 · Malone et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090083064A1 · Mahinda · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090144082A1 · Selbst et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177488A1 · Unland et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177490A1 · Howe et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090281823A1 · Hardaway · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090281824A1 · Hardaway · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090319311A1 · Mi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090326975A1 · Hardaway et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100057489A1 · Howe · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100161351A1 · Howe et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100217622A1 · Brown et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100287002A1 · Barre et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312578A1 · Hardaway · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110029321A1 · Rourke et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110054935A1 · Hardaway · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110246232A1 · Starko · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120253829A1 · John et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130144649A1 · Kalies, Jr. · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278495A1 · Rourke et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160034668A1 · Rourke et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170161458A1 · Rourke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190279753A1 · Rourke et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003263499A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
KR 20010075839A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 9524010A1 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
WO 9744752A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014151911A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
AMCP Guide to Pharmaceutical Payment Methods, Comperhensive Edition, AMCP Task Force on Drug Payment Methodologies, Oct. 2007, 65 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bank of America and Caremark Introduce Pharma Rewards Credit Card, http://www.banking-business-review.com/news/bank_of_america_and_caremark_introduce_pharma_r, Oct. 27, 2006, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), 2006 Prescription Drug Event Data Training Participant Guide, Jul. 2006, pp. 1-222. [cited by applicant]
CitiBusiness Credit Cards Free Prescription Discount Program, Payment News, May 11, 2006, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
CitiBusiness(R) Credit Cards Announces New Card member Benefit Free Prescription Discount Program, http:/Mw-N.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/ww, Jun. 10, 2009, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Comments of Generic Pharmaceutical Association for the Public Meeting on Proposed Changes to the National Drug Code System, Nov. 24, 2006, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cost Sharing Strategies for OHP Medical Services, revised Jul. 5, 2001, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Credit Cards Offer Discounts on Prescription Drugs, http://wbztv.com/consumer/credit.Card.Discounts.2.682345.html, Mar. 26, 2008, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
CVS to Buy MinuteClinic Walk-In Medical Service, Los Angeles Times, Jul. 14, 2006, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Florida House of Representatives, Enrolled CS/HB 535, Legislature, 2008, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/026660, mailed on Aug. 4, 2014, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
MedImpact Medicare Part D 2008 Pre-Processing Drug List (PPDL) White Paper, Mar. 25, 2008, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
MedImpact Medicare Part D 2009 Pre-Processing Drug List (PPDL) White Paper, MedImpact, Mar. 25, 2008, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
MedImpact Medicare Part D Drug List White Paper, Oct. 13, 2005, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
MedImpact Medicare Part D Pre-Processing Drug List (PPDL) White Paper, MedImpact, Updated Jul. 20, 2006, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for Application No. PCT/US2014/026660, mailed on Sep. 15, 2015, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International PCT Application No. PCT/US06/042976, mailed Sep. 11, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Prescription Card, Union Plus Health Savings Presicription Card, Jun. 6, 2009, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
EPN—Electronic Prescribing News, Systems Xcellence Announces Three-Year $4.0 Million Software License, Support and Operations Contract, Nov. 9, 2005, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Walgreens Store Green Dot Prepaid MasterCard and Visa cards, Available on: http://www.walgreens.com/store/promotion/greendot/default.jsp, Jun. 10, 2009, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Requirements for Submitting Prescription Drug Event (PDE) Data”, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Apr. 27, 2006, pp. 1-92. [cited by applicant]
Federal Register (May 16, 2008) “Medicare Program; Revisions to the Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Benefit Programs”, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), 66 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huskamp et al. (Mar.-Apr. 2000) “The Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit: How Will the Game be Played?”, Health Affairs, 19(2):8-23. [cited by applicant]
Laing et al. (Feb. 2007) “Tuberculosis Drug Issues: Prices, Fixed Dose Combination Products and Second Line Drugs”, Journal Tuberculosis Disease, 4(12):S194-S207. [cited by applicant]
Lipton et al. (Mar.-Apr. 2000) “Managing the Pharmacy Benefit in Medicare HMOs: What Do We Really Know?”, Health Affairs, 19(2):42-58. [cited by applicant]
“Prescription Drug Event (PDE) Submission Process Summary”, Infocrossing Healthcare Services, Infocrossing, 2007, pp. 1-2. [cited by applicant]
“American Inventor Develops Method for Competitive Prescription Drug and/or Bidding Service Provider Selection”, ProQuest, May 11, 2010, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]