IP Library Granted Patent US 12,628,809
Granted Patent B2
US 12,628,809 · App. 17/996,297 · Granted May 19, 2026

Methods and algorithms for optimizing application of residue limited crop protection products using variable-rate application

Inventors: Flavio Centola (Schaffhausen, CH); Doron Gal (Caesarea, IL)
Assignee: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
A01M7/0089G06Q10/06316G06Q50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,628,809
App. No.
17/996,297
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are methods and systems for generating instructions for variable rate application of crop protection materials, comprising computing a total dosage of crop protection material(s) allowed for application in a crop field such that crop protection material(s) residue in products of crop planted in the crop field does not exceed a predefined MRL, adjusting the total dosage according to residue affecting parameters, mapping the crop field to segments according to pest distribution of one or more pests in each segment, computing a dosage of the crop protection material(s) estimated to effectively control the pest(s) in each segment based on the pest distribution in the respective segment, computing a variable rate application of the crop protection material total dosage in the crop field based on the dosage estimated for each segment, and outputting instructions to apply the crop protection material(s) in the crop field according to the variable rate application.

Claims (52)

1 . A computer implemented method of a variable rate application of crop protection materials, comprising:

computing a total dosage of at least one crop protection material allowed for application in a crop field such that residue of the at least one crop protection material in a product of a crop planted in the crop field does not exceed a predefined Maximum Residue Limit (MRL);

adjusting the total dosage according to at least some of a plurality of residue affecting parameters of the crop field;

mapping the crop field to a plurality of segments according to a pest distribution of at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments;

computing a dosage of the at least one crop protection material estimated to effectively control the at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments based on the pest distribution in the respective segment;

computing the variable rate application of the crop protection material total dosage in the crop field based on the dosage estimated for each of the plurality of segments; and

outputting machine-readable instructions to one or more electronically controlled applicator systems to apply the at least one crop protection material in the crop field according to the variable rate application; wherein the one or more applicator systems comprise one or more tanks containing the crop protection material and are configured to apply the variable rate application of the at least one crop protection material in the crop field based on the machine-readable instructions;

wherein the machine-readable instructions further define applying the at least one crop protection material to at least a subset of the plurality of segments according to the variable rate application, the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments such that a cumulative dosage does not exceed the total dosage;

wherein the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments based on a ranking score computed for each of the plurality of segments based on a respective pest distribution in the respective segment such that the subset includes a plurality of highest ranking segments of the plurality of segments having a cumulative dosage which does not exceed the total dosage; and

wherein the plurality of residue affecting parameters comprise: a type of the at least one crop protection material, a growth stage of the crop, an estimated biomass of the crop, an estimated residue from at least one previous crop protection material application in the crop field, an estimated residual crop protection material estimated for at least one future crop protection material application planned for the crop field, an Organic Matter (OM) content in the crop field, a type of the at least one pest, a type of at least one crop protection material previously applied in the crop field, and an environmental condition in a geographical region of the crop field.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further define applying a plurality of crop protection materials each according to a respective variable rate application in case multiple crop protection materials are selected for application in at least one of the segments.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting the at least one crop protection material according to the at least one pest identified based on the pest distribution.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one pest is a member of a group consisting of: weed, nematode, mite, fungi, insect and disease pathogen.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one crop protection material is a member of a group consisting of: herbicide, fungicide, pesticide, nematicide, insecticide, miticide, surfactant and adjuvant.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pest distribution is identified based on analysis of at least one image of the crop field.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pest distribution is identified based on analysis of at least one past image of the crop field captured in at least one previous growth cycle.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pest distribution is identified based on analysis of at least one crop growth report generated for the crop field.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pest distribution is identified based on analysis of sensory data captured in the crop field by at least one sensor.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the mapping the plurality of segments is further based on a zone map of the crop field mapping the crop field to a plurality of zones based on at least one of a plurality of soil attribute of each of the zones, the plurality of zone attributes comprising soil attributes, water attributes and topographic attributes.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the effective control reflects eradicating and/or repelling at least a predefined minimal percentage of the at least one pest in the respective segment.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the effective control reflects limiting an impact of the at least one pest to less than a predefined maximal percentage of a yield of the crop in the respective segment.

13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying at least one machine learning model to compute the respective dosage for at least one of the plurality of segments, the at least one machine learning model is trained to correlate between a plurality of dosages of the at least one crop protection material and effective control of a plurality of pest distributions of the at least one pest.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising first computing the variable rate application followed by computing the total dosage by:

mapping the crop field to the plurality of segments based on the pest distribution,

computing a respective dosage of the at least one crop protection material for each of the plurality of segments based on the pest distribution in the respective segment,

computing the variable rate application based on the dosage estimated for each of the plurality of segments, and

computing the total dosage such that residue of the at least one crop protection material in a product of a crop planted in the crop field does not exceed the predefined MRL.

15 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising rejecting the variable rate application and/or part thereof in case a cumulative dosage of the respective dosages of the plurality of segments exceeds the total dosage.

16 . A system for a variable rate application of crop protection materials, comprising:

one or more applicator systems; and

at least one processor executing a code, the code comprising:

code instructions to compute a total dosage of at least one crop protection material allowed for application in the crop field such that residue of the at least one crop protection material in a product of a crop planted in the crop field does not exceed a predefined Maximum Residue Limit (MRL);

code instructions to adjust the total dosage according to at least some of a plurality of residue affecting parameters of the crop field;

code instructions to map the crop field to a plurality of segments according to a pest distribution of at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments;

code instructions to compute a dosage of the at least one crop protection material estimated to effectively control the at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments based on the emergent weed pest distribution in the respective segment;

code instructions to compute the variable rate application of the crop protection material total dosage in the crop field based on the dosage estimated for each of the plurality of segments; and

code instructions to output machine-readable instructions to one or more electronically controlled applicator systems to apply the at least one crop protection material in the crop field according to the variable rate application;

wherein the one or more applicator systems comprise one or more tanks containing the crop protection material and are configured to apply the variable rate application of the at least one crop protection material in the crop field based on the machine-readable instructions;

wherein the machine-readable code instructions further define applying the at least one crop protection material to at least a subset of the plurality of segments according to the variable rate application, the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments such that a cumulative dosage does not exceed the total dosage;

wherein the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments based on a ranking score computed for each of the plurality of segments based on a respective pest distribution in the respective segment such that the subset includes a plurality of highest ranking segments of the plurality of segments having a cumulative dosage which does not exceed the total dosage; and

wherein the plurality of residue affecting parameters comprise: a type of the at least one crop protection material, a growth stage of the crop, an estimated biomass of the crop, an estimated residue from at least one previous crop protection material application in the crop field, an estimated residual crop protection material estimated for at least one future crop protection material application planned for the crop field, an Organic Matter (OM) content in the crop field, a type of the at least one pest, a type of at least one crop protection material previously applied in the crop field, and an environmental condition in a geographical region of the crop field.

17 . A computer program product comprising computer readable program code stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium, the computer readable program code is configured to be executed by at least one processor, wherein the computer readable program code comprises code instructions for a variable rate application of crop protection materials by:

computing a total dosage of at least one crop protection material allowed for application in the crop field such that residue of the at least one crop protection material in a product of a crop planted in the crop field does not exceed a predefined Maximum Residue Limit (MRL);

adjusting the total dosage according to at least some of a plurality of residue affecting parameters of the crop field;

mapping the crop field to a plurality of segments according to a pest distribution of at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments;

computing a dosage of the at least one crop protection material estimated to effectively control the at least one pest in each of the plurality of segments based on the pest distribution in the respective segment;

computing the variable rate application of the crop protection material total dosage in the crop field based on the dosage estimated for each of the plurality of segments; and

outputting machine-readable instructions to one or more electronically controlled applicator systems to apply the at least one crop protection material in the crop field according to the variable rate application;

wherein the one or more applicator systems comprise one or more tanks containing the crop protection material and are configured to apply the variable rate application of the at feast one crop protection material in the crop field based on the machine-readable instructions;

wherein the machine-readable instructions further define applying the at least one crop protection material to at least a subset of the plurality of segments according to the variable rate application, the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments such that a cumulative dosage does not exceed the total dosage;

wherein the subset comprises segments selected from the plurality of segments based on a ranking score computed for each of the plurality of segments based on a respective pest distribution in the respective segment such that the subset includes a plurality of highest ranking segments of the plurality of segments having a cumulative dosage which does not exceed the total dosage; and

wherein the plurality of residue affecting parameters comprise: a type of the at least one crop protection material, a growth stage of the crop, an estimated biomass of the crop, an estimated residue from at least one previous crop protection material application in the crop field, an estimated residual crop protection material estimated for at least one future crop protection material application planned for the crop field, an Organic Matter (OM) content in the crop field, a type of the at least one pest, a type of at least one crop protection material previously applied in the crop field, and an environmental condition in a geographical region of the crop field.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2022
From: CENTOLA, FLAVIO; GAL, DORON
To: ADAMA MAKHTESHIM LTD.
Reel/Frame 061615/0941 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2022
From: ADAMA MAKHTESHIM LIMITED
To: SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG
Reel/Frame 061616/0100 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63010783 · Apr 16, 2020
Related Publication 20230217914A1 · Jul 13, 2023
References Cited (39)
US 4992942A · Bauerle · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5884224A · McNabb · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6230091B1 · McQuinn · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 8924030B2 · Wendte · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9563852B1 · Wiles · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9756844B2 · Groeneveld · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10957036B2 · Stueve · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11477935B1 · Muehlfeld · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11968973B2 · Seitz · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020040300A1 · Ell · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20150100358A1 · Klavins · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150370935A1 · Starr · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190050948A1 · Perry · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190174739A1 · Peters et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190246549A1 · Peters · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200281110A1 · McNichols · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210078706A1 · Lin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CA 3029322A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 107315381A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 107391952A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109845715A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 110415133A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 110461148A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3378306A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO0195217A1 · 2001 [cited by examiner]
WO WO0232222A1 · 2002 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2012047834A1 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018216214A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2019148138A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
VanWoerkom, Anthony Hale. Managing Pesticide Residue Levels of Michigan Apples and Cherries to Meet Global MRLs. Michigan State University, 2017. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
MacLachlan, Dugald J., and Denis Hamilton. “A review of the effect of different application rates on pesticide residue levels in supervised residue trials.” Pest management science 67.6 (2011): 609-615. (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
McKenzie, Ross H. “Variable rate fertilizer application—a common sense approach.” Top Crop Manager (2014) (accessed on Aug. 6, 2024 at https://www.topcropmanager.com/variable-rate-fertilizer-application-a-common-sense-a… [cited by examiner]
Campos, Javier, et al. “On-farm evaluation of prescription map-based variable rate application of pesticides in vineyards.” Agronomy 10.1 (2020): 102. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Talaviya, Tanha, et al. “Implementation of artificial intelligence in agriculture for optimisation of irrigation and application of pesticides and herbicides.” Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture 4 (2020): 58-73. (Ye… [cited by examiner]
Yang, Chenghai. “Remote sensing and precision agriculture technologies for crop disease detection and management with a practical application example.” Engineering 6.5 (2020): 528-532. (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
European Food Safety Authority. Recommendations on the use of the proportionality approach in the framework of risk assessment for pesticide residues. vol. 15. No. 11. 2018. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Smith, Graeme, and Peter Dal Santo. Neutralising pesticides in recirculating water systems within a protected cropping system. Horticulture Australia, 2011. (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
WIPO; App. No. PCT/IL2021/050427; International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jul. 27, 2021. [cited by applicant]
English Translation of the Chinese Office Action issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202180029034.1 dated Apr. 8, 2025; 8 pages. [cited by applicant]