IP Library Granted Patent US 12,355,595
Granted Patent B2
US 12,355,595 · App. 17/998,860 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Determining a signal quality using an error vector magnitude

Inventor: Colin D. Frank (Park Ridge, IL)
Assignee: Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
H04L25/03891H04B7/0413
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,355,595
App. No.
17/998,860
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Apparatuses, methods, and systems are disclosed for determining a signal quality using an error vector magnitude. One method includes receiving an output of a user equipment antenna port. The user equipment antenna port includes a linear combination of two or more transmit antennas. The method includes performing normalized maximum ratio combining on the output of the user equipment antenna port to produce a normalized output. The method includes determining a signal quality of the output of the user equipment antenna port. Determining the signal quality includes determining an error vector magnitude using the normalized output.

Claims (68)

1. A method performed by an evaluation device, the method comprising:

receiving an output from an antenna port, wherein the antenna port comprises a linear combination of two or more transmit antennas;

performing normalized maximum ratio combining on the output of the antenna port to produce a normalized output; and

determining a signal quality of the output of the antenna port, wherein determining the signal quality comprises determining an error vector magnitude using the normalized output.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the output of the antenna port comprises receiving the output using a separate conductive path from each transmit antenna of the two or more transmit antennas.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the output of the antenna port comprises receiving the output using receive antenna ports, and each receive antenna port of the receive antenna ports comprises a linear combination of one or more receive antennas.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining is given by

(

Hw

)

H

(

Hw

H

)

Hw

,

and wherein a vector w denotes linear combining weights comprising a transmit port, H is a channel matrix, and a term Hij in an i-th column and j-th row denotes a complex gain of a channel from a j-th transmit antenna to an i-th receive port.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a fast Fourier transform is computed for an output of each antenna connector.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining is performed for each subcarrier of each allocated resource block based a channel estimate for each subcarrier for each antenna connector.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining performed for each subcarrier is applied to a result of the fast Fourier transform.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the error vector magnitude is determined by comparing known data symbols with the normalized output.

9. An evaluation device, comprising:

at least one memory; and

at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and configured to cause the evaluation device to:

receive an output from an antenna port, wherein the antenna port comprises a linear combination of two or more transmit antennas;

perform normalized maximum ratio combining on the output of the antenna port to produce a normalized output; and

determine a signal quality of the output of the antenna port, wherein determining the signal quality comprises determining an error vector magnitude using the normalized output.

10. The evaluation device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the evaluation device to receive the output using a separate conductive path from each transmit antenna of the two or more transmit antennas.

11. The evaluation device of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to cause the evaluation device to receive the output using receive antenna ports, and each receive antenna port of the receive antenna ports comprises a linear combination of one or more receive antennas.

12. The evaluation device of claim 9 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining is given by

(

Hw

)

H

(

Hw

H

)

Hw

,

denotes linear combining weights comprising a transmit port, H is a channel matrix, and a term Hij in an i-th column and j-th row denotes a complex gain of a channel from a j-th transmit antenna to an i-th receive port.

13. The evaluation device of claim 9 , wherein a fast Fourier transform is computed for an output of each antenna connector.

14. The evaluation device of claim 13 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining is performed for each subcarrier of each allocated resource block based a channel estimate for each subcarrier for each antenna connector.

15. The evaluation device of claim 14 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining performed for each subcarrier is applied to a result of the fast Fourier transform.

16. The evaluation device of claim 15 , wherein the error vector magnitude is determined by comparing known data symbols with the normalized output.

17. A processor for performing evaluations, comprising:

at least one controller coupled with at least one memory and configured to cause the processor to:

receive an output from an antenna port, wherein the antenna port comprises a linear combination of two or more transmit antennas;

perform normalized maximum ratio combining on the output of the antenna port to produce a normalized output; and

determine a signal quality of the output of the antenna port, wherein determining the signal quality comprises determining an error vector magnitude using the normalized output.

18. The processor of claim 17 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to cause the processor to receive the output using a separate conductive path from each transmit antenna of the two or more transmit antennas.

19. The processor of claim 17 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to cause the processor to receive the output using receive antenna ports, and each receive antenna port of the receive antenna ports comprises a linear combination of one or more receive antennas.

20. The processor of claim 17 , wherein the normalized maximum ratio combining is given by

(

Hw

)

H

(

Hw

H

)

Hw

,

and wherein a vector w denotes linear combining weights comprising a transmit port, H is a channel matrix of dimension M×N, and a term Hij in an i-th column and j-th row denotes a complex gain of a channel from a j-th transmit antenna to an i-th receive port.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2025
From: LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
To: EDGEWOOD IP, LLC
Reel/Frame 074118/0091 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 1, 2022
From: FRANK, COLIN D.
To: LENOVO (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 061946/0597 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63025978 · May 15, 2020
Related Publication 20230198817A1 · Jun 22, 2023
References Cited (8)
US 20130016793A1 · Dybdal · 2013 [cited by examiner]
PCT/IB2021/054179, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration”, International Searching Authority, Aug. 27, 2021,… [cited by applicant]
Motorola Mobility, “EVM Definitions for Antenna Ports and MIMO Layers”, 3GPPRAN4#94-e-Bis R4-2004791, Apr. 20-30, 2020, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Motorola Mobility, “On the Transmit EVM Requirement for UL MIMO Transmission”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting RAN4#95-e R4-2008057, May 25-Jun. 5, 2020, pp. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Motorola Mobility, “Considerations on the EVM Definition for an Antenna Port or a Single MIMO Layer”, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG4 Meeting RAN4#95-e R4-2008276, May 25-Jun. 5, 2020, pp. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; Part 2: Range 2 Standalone (Release 16)”, 3GPP TS 38.101-2 V16.3.1… [cited by applicant]
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; NR; User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; Part 1: Range 1 Standalone (Release 16)”, 3GPP TS 38.101-1 V16.3.0… [cited by applicant]
3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception (Release 16)”, 3GP… [cited by applicant]