IP Library Granted Patent US 12,287,413
Granted Patent B2
US 12,287,413 · App. 18/009,516 · Granted Apr 29, 2025

Method for gauging a track position

Inventor: Bernhard Lichtberger (Vienna, AT)
G01S19/43B61K9/08B61L23/047E01B35/00G01S19/45G01S19/49B61L2205/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,287,413
App. No.
18/009,516
Granted
Apr 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for gauging a track position uses a track gauging trolley ( 7 ) moved on the track. A gauging run is carried out with the track gauging trolley ( 7 ), a GPS antenna ( 8 ) and an RTK GPS receiver ( 11 ) that communicates with an RTK correction data service (RTK-KD), wherein at least one wheel ( 10 ) of the track gauging trolley ( 7 ) is pressed against a rail ( 4 ). Using boundary conditions such as constraint positions, constraint points and maximum permissible track position corrections, to avoid the disadvantages of the drifts of an inertial gauging system during long gauging runs and the only relative information on the track position, the position of the GPS antenna ( 8 ) with respect to a reference axis of the track ( 4, 10 ) is determined with the aid of a compensation scanner ( 6 ) and a computing unit ( 13 ), and the measured GPS coordinates are converted into Cartesian coordinates (Pi(xi, yi, zi)) recorded with the computing unit ( 13 ) as a spatial curve ( 3 ), from which the location image ( 1 ), from which a desired curvature image (ksoll) is calculated, and the longitudinal image ( 2 ), from which a desired longitudinal inclination image (Nsoll) is calculated, are formed. An inertial system (INS) is set up on the gauging trolley ( 7 ), with which inertial system a correction spatial curve of the same section is created, and recorded using the computing unit ( 13 ) and is used as a correction value for the GPS coordinates converted into Cartesian coordinates (Pi(xi, yi, zi)).

Claims (22)

1. A method for gauging a track position using a track gauging trolley supported for movement on a track, said method comprising:

carrying out a gauging run with the track gauging trolley, a GPS antenna, and an RTK-GPS receiver that communicates with an RTK correction data service, wherein at least one wheel of the track gauging trolley is pressed against a rail; including

determining a position of the GPS antenna with respect to a reference axis of the track using a compensation scanner and a computing unit, and

converting measured GPS coordinates into Cartesian coordinates (P i (x i , y i , z i )) and storing the converted GPS coordinates with the computing unit so as to form a spatial curve of a section;

forming from the spatial curve a location image and a longitudinal image;

calculating a nominal curvature image (GPS xysoll ) from the location image; and

calculating a nominal longitudinal inclination image (N soll ) from the longitudinal image; and

wherein an inertial system is set up on the track gauging trolley, and the method further comprises

producing with said inertial system a correction spatial curve of the section;

recording the correction spatial curve using the computing unit; and

using the correction spatial curve to produce a correction value for the converted GPS coordinates.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the correction value is determined from a difference of actual values and nominal values from the location image and the longitudinal image, wherein the actual values are derived from the correction spatial curve determined by the inertial system and the nominal values are derived from the nominal curvature image (GPS xysoll ).

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the correction spatial curve generated by the inertial system is used as the spatial curve when the spatial curve has data of the GPS coordinates missing therefrom.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the compensation scanner comprises a laser scanner that determines a relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein, the laser determines the relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail determining an inclination of a machine frame and a distance thereof from the track gauging trolley.

6. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the correction spatial curve generated by the inertial system is used as the spatial curve when the spatial curve has data of the GPS coordinates missing therefrom.

7. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the compensation scanner comprises a laser scanner that determines a relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail.

8. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the compensation scanner comprises a laser scanner that determines a relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail.

9. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the compensation scanner comprises a laser scanner that determines a relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail.

10. The method according to claim 7 , wherein, the laser determines the relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail by determining an inclination of a machine frame and a distance thereof from the track gauging trolley.

11. The method according to claim 8 , wherein, the laser determines the relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail by determining an inclination of a machine frame and a distance thereof from the track gauging trolley.

12. The method according to claim 9 , wherein, the laser determines the relative position of the GPS antenna to the rail by determining an inclination of a machine frame and a distance thereof from the track gauging trolley.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2022
From: LICHTBERGER, BERNHARD
To: HP3 REAL GMBH
Reel/Frame 062113/0447 →
Priority Claims (1)
AT A50520/2020 · Jun 18, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230221448A1 · Jul 13, 2023
References Cited (20)
US 4812991A · Hatch · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 7050926B2 · Theurer et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8834062B1 · Schmidt · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 10174461B2 · Lichtberger · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10619313B2 · Fruehwirt · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030097235A1 · Theurer et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20120086598A1 · Aghili · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297069A1 · Landes et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170268180A1 · Lichtberger · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180106000A1 · Fruehwirt · 2018 [cited by applicant]
AU 2018200145A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 117048668A · 2023 [cited by examiner]
DE 10337976B4 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
EP 1028325A2 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
EP 3358079A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004029825A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016090401A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016202420A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
B. Lichtberger, “Stand der Langsehnenvermessung mittels EM-SAT oder GPS”, Der Eisenbahningenieur 46 (1995) 8, pp. 560-563, May 19, 1995. [cited by applicant]
L. Marx, “Satellitengestutzte Gleisvermessung auch beim Oberbau”, Der Eisenbahningenieur 58 (2007) 6, pp. 9-13, Jun. 2007. [cited by applicant]