Fault location determination in a power transmission system
Fault location determination in a power transmission system is described. Samples of voltage and current measured are obtained for each phase at a terminal. A first equivalent reactance value based on the samples of voltage and current is calculated. Further, based on the calculated equivalent reactance value a first fault location is determined.
1 . A method for fault location in a power transmission system, the method comprising:
obtaining samples of voltage and current measured at a terminal of the transmission line during a fault;
calculating a first equivalent reactance value based on the samples of voltage and current;
determining a first fault location based on the calculated equivalent reactance value;
calculating at least one subsequent equivalent reactance value based on subsequent samples of voltage and current; and
determining at least one subsequent fault location based on the calculated respective at least one subsequent equivalent reactance value.
2 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising determining a refined fault location based on detection of a convergence between the first fault location and the at least one subsequent fault location.
3 . The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the convergence is detected when a difference between two consecutive ones of the first fault location and the at least one subsequent fault location is smaller than a threshold.
4 . The method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the refined fault location is an average of at least a subset of the first fault location and the least one subsequent fault location.
5 . The method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein forming an average of the first fault location and the least one subsequent fault location comprises applying a second moving window average filter to the fault location estimates.
6 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method is executed during a power swing.
7 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the respective equivalent reactance value is computed as a function of sine of angle equivalent of step time and samples of voltage and current.
8 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein averaged values of the samples of voltage and current are used for calculating the equivalent reactance value.
9 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein determining the respective fault location comprises dividing the corresponding equivalent reactance value by a per unit reactance of the transmission line.
10 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , comprising calculating a zone-1 impedance for distance protection based on the fault location.
11 . The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the voltage and current measurements are single-ended time domain-based measurements.
12 . A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to execute the method of claim 1 .
13 . A method for fault location in a power transmission system, the method comprising:
obtaining samples of voltage and current measured at a terminal of the transmission line during a fault;
calculating a first equivalent reactance value based on the samples of voltage and current, wherein averaged values of the samples of voltage and current are used for calculating the first equivalent reactance value, wherein averaged values of the samples of voltage and current are formed by applying a first moving window average filter to the samples of voltage and current; and
determining a first fault location based on the calculated equivalent reactance value.
14 . A device for determining a fault location in a power transmission system, the device comprising:
a processor; and
a fault location determination module executable by the processor to:
obtain samples of voltage and current measured at a terminal of the transmission line during a fault;
calculate a first equivalent reactance value based on the samples of voltage and current;
determine a first fault location based on the calculated equivalent reactance value;
calculate at least one subsequent equivalent reactance value based on subsequent samples of voltage and current; and
determine at least one subsequent fault location based on the calculated respective at least one subsequent equivalent reactance value.
15 . The device as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the fault location determination module is to
determine a refined fault location based on detection of a convergence between the first fault location and the at least one subsequent fault location, wherein the convergence is detected when a difference between two consecutive ones of the first fault location and the at least one subsequent fault location is smaller than a threshold; and
wherein the refined fault location is an average of at least a subset of the first fault location and the least one subsequent fault location.
16 . The device as claimed in claim 14 , wherein averaged values of the samples of voltage and current are used for calculating the equivalent reactance value;
wherein the fault location determination module is to apply a first moving window average filter to the samples of voltage and current to form averaged values of the samples of voltage and current; and
apply a second moving window average filter to the fault location estimates to form an average of the first fault location and the least one subsequent fault location.
17 . The device as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the fault location determination module is to divide the corresponding equivalent reactance value by a per unit reactance of the transmission line to determine the respective fault location.
18 . The device as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the fault location determination module is to calculate a zone-1 impedance for distance protection based on the fault location; and
wherein the voltage and current measurements are single-ended time domain-based measurements.