Methods and apparatus for aligning and splicing optical fibers
A system of aligning concatenated sections of multicore optical fiber incorporates the capability of intentionally changing core assignments as part of the azimuthal alignment process. The intentional changing of core assignments, referred to as offset clocking, compensates for differences in properties of the individual core regions in a way that reduces variations between the spatial channels supported in the transmission system. The offset clocking technique can be used, e.g., to improve the attenuation (or other selected properties of the propagating signals). The offset clocking technique may be used to step through sequential changes core assignments at one or more splice locations (passive clocking) or identify a particular pairing of cores from one fiber section to the next (e.g., “good quality” core assigned to a “poor quality” signal exiting the first section) and rotate the fiber sections with respect to each other to achieve this particular core assignment.
1 . In a transmission system using a plurality of multicore optical fibers (MCFs) concatenated together at a set of splice locations to transmit a set of separate optical signals between an input and an output, each MCF having a plurality of at least C total individual core regions, a method of joining the plurality of MCFs comprising:
determining M equiv ways of aligning the plurality of at least C total individual cores in a first MCF of the plurality of MCFs with individual cores in a second MCF of the plurality of MCFs, where an integer multiple of 360°/M equiv defines a clocking angle,
identifying a designated core for use as a reference core in the first MCF and the second MCF,
determining a core-to-core alignment position between the first MCF and the second MCF, and
rotating the first and second MCFs relative to each other through a combination of the determined alignment position and the clocking angle to change designated core assignments for the set of optical signals propagating through the second MCF.
2 . The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the steps of determining the core-to-core alignment position and rotating the first and second MCFs are repeated at defined splice locations of the set of splice locations.
3 . The method as defined in claim 2 , wherein the second MCF is rotated clockwise at each defined splice location.
4 . The method as defined in claim 2 , wherein the second MCF is rotated counterclockwise at each defined splice location.
5 . The method as defined in claim 2 , further comprising
maintaining a traceable assignment of cores to spatial channels between the input and the output.
6 . The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the steps of determining the core-to-core alignment position and rotating the first and second MCFs relative to each other are repeated at each splice location of the set of splice locations.
7 . The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the integer has a unity value and the clocking angle is defined as 360°/M equiv .
8 . The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the second MCF is rotated clockwise at each defined splice location.
9 . The method as defined in claim 7 , wherein the second MCF is rotated counterclockwise at each defined splice location.
10 . The method as defined in claim 7 wherein the steps of determining a core-to-core alignment position and rotating the first and second MCFs relative to each other are repeated at each splice location of the set of splice locations.
11 . The method as defined in claim 1 , where the integer multiple of 360°/M equiv at defined splice locations is selected to provide a clocking angle associated with a predetermined change in core assignment.
12 . The method as defined in claim 11 wherein the clocking angle is selected to provide a core assignment based on properties of the set of optical signals exiting the first MCF.
13 . The method as defined in claim 12 wherein the clocking angle is selected to intentionally assign a core of the second MCF with optimum properties to a poor quality optical signal exiting the first MCF.
14 . The method as defined in claim 11 wherein the steps of determining a core-to-core alignment position and rotating the first and second MCFs relative to each other are repeated at each splice location of the set of splice locations.
15 . An optical fiber transmission system comprising
a plurality of concatenated sections of multicore optical fiber each fiber including a marker identifying a designated core assignment, where at one or more splicing locations between adjacent sections of multicore optical fiber of the plurality of concatenated sections of multicore optical fiber there are M equiv ways of aligning the individual core regions therebetween, orienting the adjacent multicore optical fiber sections such that there is an offset clocking rotation of an integer multiple of 360°/M equiv at the splicing location combined with a core-to-core alignment of the designated cores.
16 . A transmission system comprising a plurality of concatenated sections of multicore optical fiber, wherein
each section of multicore optical fiber includes a plurality of at least C total offset core regions used to support the transmission of a plurality of separate optical signals, a marker included in each section in proximity to a selected core region as a reference point, where
one or more sections of multicore optical fiber are rotated to intentionally change core assignments with respect to the plurality of separate optical signals.
17 . The transmission system as defined in claim 16 wherein changes in core assignments are clocked through increments of 360°/M equiv , or an integer multiple thereof, from one section of multicore optical fiber to another further along in the span such that a propagating optical signal maintains a same spatial location yet passes through different core regions between the input and the output of the transmission system, where at one or more splicing locations between adjacent sections of multicore optical fiber of the plurality of concatenated sections of multicore optical fiber there are M equiv ways of aligning the individual core regions therebetween.
18 . The transmission system as defined in claim 16 wherein changes in core assignment are determined based on performance properties of the individual sections of multicore optical fiber, where at a splice location a first section and a second section are rotated relative to each other to intentionally match a poor quality core region of a first section of multicore optical fiber with a good quality core region of the second section of multicore optical fiber.