Granted Patent B1

US 12,282,553 · App. 18/055,684 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Inventors: Jeremy W. Long (Herndon, VA); David Kenneth Eggen (St Louis Park, MN)

Assignee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

G06F21/563G06F21/577G06F2221/033

Abstract

Claims (70)

1. A method comprising:

generating, by a computing system, a build artifact model from at least one build artifact resulting from a software build process of source code, wherein the build artifact model includes one or more software components extracted from the at least one build artifact;

generating, by a computing system, a source code model from the source code, wherein the source code model includes one or more software components extracted from the source code;

comparing, by the computing system, the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model;

identifying, by the computing system and based on the comparison, whether at least one discrepancy occurs between the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, wherein identifying that the at least one discrepancy occurs comprises identifying at least one software component of the build artifact model that does not match with the one or more software components of the source code model such that the at least one build artifact is not producible by the source code;

in response to identifying the at least one discrepancy, determining, by the computing system, a level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy; and

in response to determining the level of risk associated with the at the least one discrepancy, generating, by the computing system, a decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the source code is compiled into the at least one build artifact by a build server, and wherein the build server is independent from the computing system.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, in response to determining that the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy exceeds a threshold, generating a report indicating the at least one discrepancy and that data was potentially modified during the software build process of the source code that produced the at least one build artifact.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the build artifact model comprises:

extracting tokens from the at least one build artifact,

determining the one or more software components from the tokens extracted from the at least one build artifact, and

assigning a threat level to each software component of the build artifact model, wherein the threat level indicates a level of risk if the respective software component of the build artifact model does not match with a corresponding software component of the source code model.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the source code model comprises:

extracting tokens from the source code,

determining the one or more software components from the tokens extracted from the source code, and

assigning a threat level to each software component of the source code model, wherein the threat level indicates a level of risk if the respective software component of the source code model does not match with a corresponding software component of the build artifact model.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying whether the at least one discrepancy occurs comprises generating an issue list including entries for the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, wherein, for each software component, the issue list further includes an assigned threat level indicative of a level of risk if the respective software component of one of the models does not match with the one or more software components of the other one of the models, and an audit statement indicative of either a match or a discrepancy between the respective software component of the one of the models and the one or more software components of the other one of the models.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein identifying that the at least one discrepancy occurs comprises identifying at least one entry in the issue list for the at least one software component of the build artifact model that includes an audit statement indicative of a discrepancy between the at least one software component of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein determining the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy comprises:

filtering the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model included in the issue list based on audit statements indicative of discrepancies;

accumulating counters associated with the filtered software components, wherein the counters are weighted based on threat levels assigned to the filtered software components; and

determining the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy based on the accumulated counters associated with the filtered software components.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein generating the decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product comprises:

determining whether the accumulated counters associated with the filtered software components exceed a threshold;

in response to determining that the accumulated counters exceed the threshold, generating a decision that the at least one build artifact is not approved for use in a software product; and

in response to determining that the accumulated counters do not exceed the threshold, generating a decision that the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

10. The method of claim 7 ,

wherein determining the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy comprises identifying at least one entry in the issue list for the at least one software component of the build artifact model that includes an assigned threat level indicative of a high level of risk and an audit statement indicative of the at least one software component of the build artifact model not matching the one or more software components of the source code model; and

wherein generating the decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product comprises, in response to the assigned threat level indicative of the high level of risk, generating a decision that the at least one build artifact is not approved for use in a software product.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, in response to identifying no discrepancies between the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, generating a decision indicating that the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

12. A computing system comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors in communication with the memory, the one or more processors configured to:

generate a build artifact model from at least one build artifact resulting from a software build process of source code, wherein the build artifact model includes one or more software components extracted from the at least one build artifact;

generate a source code model from the source code, wherein the source code model includes one or more software components extracted from the source code;

compare the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model;

identify, based on the comparison, whether at least one discrepancy occurs between the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, wherein to identify that the at least one discrepancy occurs, the one or more processors are configured to identify at least one software component of the build artifact model that does not match with the one or more software components of the source code model such that the at least one build artifact is not producible by the source code;

in response to identifying the at least one discrepancy, determine a level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy; and

in response to determining the level of risk associated with the at the least one discrepancy, generate a decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

13. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to, in response to determining that the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy exceeds a threshold, generate a report indicating the at least one discrepancy and that data was potentially modified during the software build process of the source code that produced the at least one build artifact.

14. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein to generate the build artifact model, the one or more processors are configured to:

extract tokens from the at least one build artifact,

determine the one or more software components from the tokens extracted from the at least one build artifact, and

assign a threat level to each software component of the build artifact model, wherein the threat level indicates a level of risk if the respective software component of the build artifact model does not match with a corresponding software component of the source code model.

15. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein to generate the source code model, the one or more processors are configured to:

extract tokens from the source code,

determine the one or more software components from the tokens extracted from the source code, and

assign a threat level to each software component of the source code model, wherein the threat level indicates a level of risk if the respective software component of the source code model does not match with a corresponding software component of the build artifact model.

16. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein to identify whether the at least one discrepancy occurs, the one or more processors are configured to generate an issue list including entries for the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, wherein, for each software component, the issue list further includes an assigned threat level indicative of a level of risk if the respective software component of one of the models does not match with the one or more software component of the other one of the models, and an audit statement indicative of either a match or a discrepancy between the respective software component of the one of the models and the one or more software components of the other one of the models.

17. The computing system of claim 16 , wherein to identify that the at least one discrepancy occurs, the one or more processors are configured to identify at least one entry in the issue list for the at least one software component of the build artifact model that includes an audit statement indicative of a discrepancy between the at least one software component of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model.

18. The computing system of claim 17 , wherein to determine the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy, the one or more processors are configured to:

filter the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model included in the issue list based on audit statements indicative of discrepancies;

accumulate counters associated with the filtered software components, wherein the counters are weighted based on threat levels assigned to the filtered software components; and

determine the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy based on the accumulated counters associated with the filtered software components.

19. The computing system of claim 18 , wherein to generate the decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product, the one or more processors are configured to:

determine whether the accumulated counters associated with the filtered software components exceed a threshold;

in response to determining that the accumulated counters exceed the threshold, generate a decision that the at least one build artifact is not approved for use in a software product; and

in response to determining that the accumulated counters do not exceed the threshold, generate a decision that the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

20. The computing system of claim 17 ,

wherein to determine the level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy, the one or more processors are configured to identify at least one entry in the issue list for the at least one software component of the build artifact model that includes an assigned threat level indicative of a high level of risk and an audit statement indicative of the at least one software component of the build artifact model not matching the one or more software components of the source code model; and

wherein to generate the decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product, the one or more processors are configured to, in response to the assigned threat level indicative of the high level of risk, generate a decision that the at least one build artifact is not approved for use in a software product.

21. The computing system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to, in response to identifying no discrepancies between the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, generate a decision indicating that the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

22. A computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed, cause one or more processors to:

generate a build artifact model from at least one build artifact resulting from a software build process of source code, wherein the build artifact model includes one or more software components extracted from the at least one build artifact;

generate a source code model from the source code, wherein the source code model includes one or more software components extracted from the source code;

compare the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model;

identify, based on the comparison, whether at least one discrepancy occurs between the one or more software components of the build artifact model and the one or more software components of the source code model, wherein to identify that the at least one discrepancy occurs, the instructions cause the one or more processors to identify at least one software component of the build artifact model that does not match with the one or more software components of the source code model such that the at least one build artifact is not producible by the source code;

in response to identifying the at least one discrepancy, determine a level of risk associated with the at least one discrepancy; and

in response to determining the level of risk associated with the at the least one discrepancy, generate a decision indicating whether the at least one build artifact is approved for use in a software product.

Assignments (2)

References Cited (37)

Cited By (2)

US 12,475,230 US 12,665,922