IP Library Granted Patent US 12,315,311
Granted Patent B2
US 12,315,311 · App. 18/072,404 · Granted May 27, 2025

Systems and methods for monitoring implement performance during an agricultural operation

Inventor: Michael R. Cozza (Pittsburgh, PA)
Assignee: CNH Industrial America LLC
G07C5/0808A01B63/1112A01B63/114A01B69/004G07C5/0825
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,315,311
App. No.
18/072,404
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for monitoring the operating performance of agricultural implements includes moving an agricultural implement in a direction of travel along a first swath of a field, and receiving data associated with a field profile of an aft portion of the field located rearward of the agricultural implement relative to the direction of travel as the implement is being moved along the first swath, with the aft portion including both the first swath and a second swath of the field located adjacent the first swath. The method also includes determining one or more profile parameters associated with the first swath and the second swath based at least in part on the data, and comparing the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath to assess an operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

Claims (35)

1. A method for monitoring operating performance of agricultural implements, the method comprising:

moving an agricultural implement in a direction of travel along a first swath of a field to perform an agricultural operation within the first swath of the field;

receiving, with a computing device, data associated with a field profile of an aft portion of the field located rearward of the agricultural implement relative to the direction of travel as the agricultural implement is being moved along the first swath, the aft portion comprising both the first swath and a second swath of the field located adjacent the first swath within the field;

determining, with the computing device, one or more profile parameters associated with the first swath and the second swath based at least in part on the data; and

comparing, with the computing device, the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath to assess an operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving the data comprises receiving the data from at least one field profile sensor supported relative to the agricultural implement.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the one or more profile parameters comprises determining an average height of the first swath and an average height of the second swath.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein comparing the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath comprises:

determining a height differential between the average height of the first swath and the average height of the second swath; and

comparing the height differential to a predetermined differential threshold to assess the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the one or more profile parameters comprises determining a roll orientation of the first swath and a roll orientation of the second swath.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein comparing the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath comprises:

determining an orientation differential between the roll orientation of the first swath and the roll orientation of the second swath; and

comparing the orientation differential to a predetermined differential threshold to assess the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising initiating a control action based at least in part on the assessment of the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein comparing the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath comprises determining that the agricultural implement is out-of-level based on the comparison; and

wherein initiating the control action comprises initiating a control action to adjust a levelness of the agricultural implement in response to the determination that the agricultural implement is out-of-level.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein initiating the control action comprises generating an operator notification associated with the operating performance of the agricultural implement.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein initiating the control action comprises adjusting an operation of at least one of the agricultural implement or a work vehicle towing the agricultural implement across the field.

11. A system for monitoring operating performance of agricultural implements, the system comprising:

an agricultural implement including a plurality of ground-engaging tools;

at least one field profile sensor supported relative to the agricultural implement, the at least one field profile sensor being configured to generate data associated with a field profile of an aft portion of a field located rearward of the agricultural implement relative to a direction of travel of the agricultural implement;

a controller communicatively coupled to the field profile sensor, the controller being configured to:

receive the data from the at least one field profile sensor associated with the field profile of the aft portion of the field as the agricultural implement is being moved along a first swath of the field during performance of an agricultural operation, the aft portion comprising both the first swath and a second swath of the field located adjacent the first swath within the field;

determining one or more profile parameters associated with the first swath and the second swath based at least in part on the data; and

comparing the one or more profile parameters for the first swath to the one or more profile parameters for the second swath to assess an operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one field profile sensor comprises at least one of one or more LIDAR devices, one or more cameras, one or more radar sensors, or one or more ultrasound sensors.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more profile parameters comprises an average height of the first swath and an average height of the second swath.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the controller is configured to determine a height differential between the average height of the first swath and the average height of the second swath, and compare the height differential to a predetermined differential threshold to assess the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more profile parameters comprises a roll orientation of the first swath and a roll orientation of the second swath.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the controller is configured to determine an orientation differential between the roll orientation of the first swath and the roll orientation of the second swath, and compare the orientation differential to a predetermined differential threshold to assess the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the controller is further configured to initiate a control action based at least in part on the assessment of the operating performance of the agricultural implement within the field.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the controller is configured to determine that the agricultural implement is out-of-level based on the comparison between the one or more profile parameters for the first swath and the one or more profile parameters for the second swath, the control action being associated with adjusting a levelness of the agricultural implement in response to the determination that the agricultural implement is out-of-level.

19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the control action comprises generating an operator notification associated with the operating performance of the agricultural implement.

20. The system of claim 17 , wherein the control action comprises adjusting an operation of at least one of the agricultural implement or a work vehicle towing the agricultural implement across the field.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2026
From: CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
To: BLUE LEAF I.P., INC.
Reel/Frame 075345/0160 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2022
From: COZZA, MICHAEL R.
To: CNH INDUSTRIAL AMERICA LLC
Reel/Frame 061928/0665 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240177538A1 · May 30, 2024
References Cited (58)
US 4935700A · Garbini et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5044756A · Gaultney et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5278423A · Wangler et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5412219A · Chappelle et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 6222628B1 · Corallo et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6608672B1 · Shibusawa et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6853937B2 · Shibusawa et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6919959B2 · Masten · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7068816B1 · Knoblauch et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7092106B2 · Cox et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7748264B2 · Prem · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8179533B2 · Alameh · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8451449B2 · Holland · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8463510B2 · Knapp · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8755049B2 · Holland · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8862339B2 · Henry et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8958603B2 · Boriah et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9026321B2 · Henry et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9030549B2 · Redden · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9050725B2 · Shull · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9058560B2 · Johnson · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9107344B2 · Madsen et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9131642B2 · Groeneveld · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9147110B2 · Anderson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9148995B2 · Hrnicek et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9282688B2 · Casper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9428885B2 · Nau · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11266054B2 · Ferrari et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020090132A1 · Boncyk et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20070039745A1 · Anderson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20140347448A1 · Hegemann et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150268218A1 · Troxler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150305228A1 · Zemenchik · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150354943A1 · Posselius et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160029547A1 · Casper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160084813A1 · Anderson et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160134844A1 · Casper et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170112043A1 · Nair et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180027179A1 · Matsuzaki et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180206393A1 · Stoller et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190073534A1 · Dvir · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200352088A1 · Arnett · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210127545A1 · Foster · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230389458A1 · Ekhe · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 1447116 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
CN 103323160 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2009153304 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012029026 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016025848 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016110832 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017049186 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Ted M. Zobek “Soil Surface Roughness Measurement” USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Lubbock, TX Published 1990 (3 Pages). [cited by applicant]
M.W.J. Davidson et al. “On the Characterization of Agricultural Soil Roughness for Radar Remote Sensing Studies” IEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 38, Issue 2 Published Aug. 6, 2002 (3 Pages). [cited by applicant]
W. Skierucha et al. “Application of smart sensors in the measurement of soil physical parameters” Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lublin, Poland Published 2004 (6 Pages). [cited by applicant]
M.M. Rahman et al. “Mapping surface roughness and soil moisture using multi-angle radar imagery without ancillary data” Science Direct / Remote Sensing of Environment 112 (2008) 391-402 Elsevier Inc. (12 Pages). [cited by applicant]
L.M. Thomsen et al. “Soil surface roughness: comparing old and new measuring methods and application in a soil erosion model” Soil, 1, 399-410, 2015 Published Apr. 24, 2015 (12 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Elbert C. Dickey et al. “Determining crop residue cover with electronic image analysis” Biological Systems Engineering Papers and Publications Paper 238 University of Nebraska—Lincoln Dated Jan. 1, 1989 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
C.S.T. Daughtry et al. “Estimating Crop Residue Cover by Blue Fluorescence Imaging” Remote Sens. Environ. 60:14-21 (1997) Elsevier Science Inc. New York, NY (8 pages). [cited by applicant]