IP Library Granted Patent US 12,482,464
Granted Patent B2
US 12,482,464 · App. 18/077,194 · Granted Nov 25, 2025

Controlling interactive agents using multi-modal inputs

Inventors: Joshua Simon Abramson (London, GB); Arun Ahuja (London, GB); Federico Javier Carnevale (London, GB); Petko Ivanov Georgiev (London, GB); Chia-Chun Hung (London, GB); Timothy Paul Lillicrap (London, GB); Alistair Michael Muldal (London, GB); Adam Anthony Santoro (London, GB); Tamara Louise von Glehn (Cambridge, GB); Jessica Paige Landon (London, GB); Gregory Duncan Wayne (London, GB); Chen Yan (London, GB); Rui Zhu (Beaconsfield, CA)
Assignee: DeepMind Technologies Limited
G10L15/22G06F40/284G06F40/40G06V10/774G06V10/82G06V20/50G10L13/02G10L15/063G10L15/16G10L2015/223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,482,464
App. No.
18/077,194
Granted
Nov 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for controlling agents. In particular, an interactive agent can be controlled based on multi-modal inputs that include both an observation image and a natural language text sequence.

Claims (89)

1 . A method performed by one or more computers and for controlling an agent interacting with an environment, the method comprising, at each of a plurality of time steps:

receiving an observation image characterizing a state of the environment at the time step;

receiving a natural language text sequence for the time step that characterizes a task being performed by the agent in the environment at the time step;

processing the observation image using an image embedding neural network to generate a plurality of image embeddings that represent the observation image;

processing the natural language text sequence using a text embedding neural network to generate a plurality of text embeddings that represent the natural language text sequence;

processing an input comprising the image embeddings, the text embeddings, and a set of one or more dedicated embeddings using a multi-modal Transformer neural network to generate an aggregated embedding, wherein the multi-modal Transformer neural network is configured to (i) apply self-attention over at least the text embeddings and the image embeddings to generate respective updated embeddings for at least the plurality of dedicated embeddings and (ii) generate the aggregated embedding from at least the respective updated embeddings for the dedicated embeddings;

selecting, using the aggregated embedding, one or more actions to be performed by the agent in response to the observation image; and

causing the agent to perform the one or more selected actions.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the multi-modal Transformer neural network comprises one or more self-attention layers that each have one or more self-attention heads, and wherein applying self-attention comprises processing the input through the one or more self-attention layers.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the set of one or more dedicated embeddings are the same for each of the plurality of time steps and are not dependent on the observation images at the plurality of time steps.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein applying self-attention comprises generating respective updated embeddings for the text embeddings and the dedicated embeddings without updating the image embeddings.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein each self-attention head of each self-attention layer is configured to:

receive a head input comprising (i) the image embeddings generated by the image embedding neural network and (ii) respective current embeddings for the text embeddings and the dedicated embeddings;

generate, from the respective current embeddings, a respective query corresponding to each text embedding and each dedicated embedding;

generate, from the image embeddings and the respective current embeddings, a respective key corresponding to each image embedding, each text embedding, and each dedicated embedding;

generate, from the image embeddings and the respective current embeddings, a respective value corresponding to each image embedding, each text embedding, and each dedicated embedding; and

apply query-key-value attention over the respective queries, keys, and values to generate a respective initial updated embedding for each text embedding and each dedicated embedding without updating the image embeddings.

6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein generating the aggregated embedding comprises:

aggregating the respective updated embeddings for the text embeddings and the dedicated embeddings to generate an initial aggregated embedding; and

combining the respective updated embeddings for the dedicated embeddings with the initial aggregated embedding to generate the aggregated embedding.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the combining comprises concatenating each respective updated embedding for each dedicated embedding and the initial aggregated embedding.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting, using the aggregated embedding, one or more actions to be performed by the agent in response to the observation image comprises:

generating a state representation from the aggregated embedding; and

selecting the one or more actions using the state representation.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein generating the state representation comprises processing the aggregated embedding using a memory neural network.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the memory neural network is a recurrent neural network.

11 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

processing the state representation using a natural language generation neural network to generate an output text sequence for the time step.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the natural language text sequence is generated by transcribing a verbalized utterance from another agent in the environment, and wherein the method further comprises:

generating speech representing the output text sequence for the time step; and

causing the agent to verbalize the generated speech.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:

processing the state representation using a text no-op neural network to generate an indication of whether text should be generated at the time step; and

wherein processing the state representation for the time step using a natural language generation neural network to generate an output text sequence for the time step comprises:

only generating the output text sequence when the indication indicates that text should be generated at the time step.

14 . The method of claim 8 , wherein selecting the one or more actions using the state representation comprises:

processing the state representation using an action policy neural network to select a single action to be performed in response to the image observation.

15 . The method of claim 8 , wherein selecting the one or more actions using the state representation comprises:

processing the state representation to select a sequence of a plurality of actions to be performed in response to the image observation, the sequence comprising a respective action at each of a plurality of positions.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein processing the state representation comprises:

processing the state representation using a high-level controller neural network to generate a respective low-level input for each position in the sequence; and

for each position, processing the respective low-level input for the position using a policy neural network to select the action to be performed by the agent at the position in the sequence.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the high-level controller neural network auto-regressively generates the respective low-level inputs for each position in the sequence after receiving as input the state representation.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the high-level controller neural network is a recurrent neural network.

19 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

processing the state representation using an action no-op neural network to generate an indication of whether any actions should be performed at the time step; and

wherein causing the agent to perform the one or more actions comprises:

only causing the agent to perform the actions when the indication indicates that actions should be performed at the time step.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the natural language text sequence is generated by transcribing a verbalized utterance from another agent in the environment.

21 . A method performed by one or more computers and for controlling an agent interacting with an environment, the method comprising, at each of a plurality of time steps:

receiving an observation image for the time step characterizing a state of the environment at the time step;

receiving a natural language text sequence for the time step that characterizes a task being performed by the agent in the environment at the time step;

processing the observation image and the natural language text sequence to generate a state representation for the time step;

generating a sequence of a plurality of actions to be performed by the agent in response to the observation image at the time step, the sequence comprising a respective action to be performed by the agent at each of a plurality of positions, the generating comprising:

processing the state representation using a high-level controller neural network to generate a respective low-level input for each position in the sequence; and

for each position, processing the respective low-level input for the position using an action policy neural network to generate the action to be performed by the agent at the position in the sequence; and

causing the agent to perform the sequence of actions.

22 . The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

processing the state representation for the time step using a natural language generation neural network to generate an output text sequence for the time step.

23 . The method of claim 22 , wherein the natural language text sequence is generated by transcribing a verbalized utterance from another agent in the environment, and wherein the method further comprises:

generating speech representing the output text sequence for the time step; and

causing the agent to verbalize the generated speech.

24 . The method of claim 22 , further comprising:

processing the state representation using a text no-op neural network to generate an indication of whether text should be generated at the time step; and

wherein processing the state representation for the time step using a natural language generation neural network to generate an output text sequence for the time step comprises:

only generating the output text sequence when the indication indicates that text should be generated at the time step.

25 . The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

processing the state representation using an action no-op neural network to generate an indication of whether any actions should be performed at the time step; and

wherein causing the agent to perform the sequence of actions comprises:

only causing the agent to perform the sequence of actions when the indication indicates that actions should be performed at the time step.

26 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the high-level controller neural network auto-regressively generates the respective low-level inputs for each position in the sequence after receiving as input the state representation.

27 . The method of claim 21 , wherein the action policy neural network comprises a respective sub-network for each of a plurality of sub-actions, and wherein processing the respective low-level input for the position using an action policy neural network to generate the action to be performed by the agent at the position in the sequence comprises:

for each of the plurality of sub-actions, processing an input comprising the respective low-level input for the position using the sub-network for the sub-action to select a value for the sub-action for the position.

28 . The method of claim 27 , wherein, for at least one of the sub-actions, the input comprises the value selected for one or more of the other sub-actions at the position.

29 . The method of claim 21 , wherein processing the observation image and the natural language text sequence to generate a state representation for the time step comprises processing the observation image and the natural language text sequence using a perceptual encoder neural network that is configured to receive as input an observation image characterizing a state of an environment at a time step and a natural language text sequence characterizing the environment and to generate as output an encoded representation for the time step, and wherein the perceptual encoder has been trained by performing operations comprising:

obtaining a plurality of training pairs, the plurality of training pairs comprising:

(i) a first pair comprising an observation image and a natural language text sequence that both correspond to the same time step, and

(ii) one or more second pairs each comprising an observation image and a natural language text sequence that correspond to different time steps;

processing each training pair using the perceptual encoder neural network to generate a respective encoded representation for each training pair;

processing the respective encoded representation for each training pair using a discriminator neural network that is configured to process the respective encoded representations to generate, for each training pair, a respective discriminator score that represents a likelihood that the observation image and the natural language text sequence in the pair from which the encoded representation was generated correspond to the same time step; and

training the perceptual encoder neural network using a contrastive learning loss based on the respective discriminator scores for each training pair.

30 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the contrastive learning loss encourages the respective discriminator score for the first pair to be higher while encouraging the respective discriminator scores for the second pairs to be lower.

31 . The method of claim 29 , wherein the discriminator neural network is a feedforward neural network that processes each encoded representation independently to generate the respective discriminator score for the corresponding training pair.

32 . The method of claim 29 , further comprising:

generating, from the encoded representation for the first training pair and using at least a policy neural network, a respective probability distribution over a set of actions for each of one or more positions in an action sequence;

obtaining data specifying a respective ground truth action performed by an expert agent at each of the one or more positions; and

training at least the policy neural network and the perceptual encoder neural network based on a behavior cloning loss that measures, for each position in the action sequence, the probability assigned to the ground truth action at the position by the probability distribution for the position.

33 . The method of claim 29 , further comprising:

training the discriminator neural network on an objective function that measures, for the first training pair, an error between the respective discriminator score for the first training pair and a first score that indicates that the observation image and the text sequence in the pair correspond to the same time step and, for each second training pair, an error between the respective discriminator score for the second training pair and a second score that indicates that the observation image and the text sequence in the pair do not correspond to the same time step.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 6, 2025
From: DEEPMIND TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: GDM HOLDING LLC
Reel/Frame 071498/0210 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2023
From: ABRAMSON, JOSHUA SIMON; AHUJA, ARUN; CARNEVALE, FEDERICO JAVIER; GEORGIEV, PETKO IVANOV; HUNG, CHIA-CHUN; LILLICRAP, TIMOTHY PAUL; MULDAL, ALISTAIR MICHAEL; SANTORO, ADAM ANTHONY; VON GLEHN, TAMARA LOUISE; LANDON, JESSICA PAIGE; WAYNE, GREGORY DUNCAN; YAN, CHEN; ZHU, RUI
To: DEEPMIND TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 062316/0485 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63286999 · Dec 7, 2021
Related Publication 20230178076A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (60)
US 11921824B1 · Hester · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20190354567A1 · Dehghani · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20220245424A1 · Goyal · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220366263A1 · Ji · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220383078A1 · Hou · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230019211A1 · Wang · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230031702A1 · Li · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230073154A1 · Paxton · 2023 [cited by examiner]
JP 2020075302A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020530602A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2021509979A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021005540A2 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021152515A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability International Appln. No. PCT/EP2022/084780, dated Jun. 5, 2024, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Japanese Appln. No. 2024-521004, dated Dec. 16, 2024, 5 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Abramson et al., “Imitating interactive intelligence,” CoRR, Jan. 21, 2021, arXiv:2012.05672v2, 96 pages. [cited by applicant]
Adiwardana et al., “Towards a human-like open-domain chatbot,” CoRR, Jan. 27, 2020 arXiv:2001.09977, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alayrac et al., “Self-supervised multimodal versatile networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Anderson et al., “Vision-and-language navigation: Interpreting visually grounded navigation instructions in real environments,” CoRR, Nov. 20, 2017, arxiv.org/abs/1711.07280, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brown et al., “Language models are few-shot learners,” CoRR, Jul. 22, 2020, arXiv:2005.14165, 75 pages. [cited by applicant]
Byrne, “Animal imitation,” Current Biology, Feb. 10, 2009, 19(3):R111-R114. [cited by applicant]
Chomsky, “A review of B.F.'s Skinner's verbal behavior,” Language, 1959, 35(1):26-58. [cited by applicant]
Christiano et al., “Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences,” CoRR, Jun. 12, 2017, arXiv:1706.03741, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Das et al., “Embodied question answering,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPR), 2018, pp. 2054-2063. [cited by applicant]
Devlin et al., “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, ” CoRR, Oct. 11, 2018, arXiv:1810.04805, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dosovitskiy et al., “An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” CoRR, Oct. 22, 2020, arXiv:2010.11929, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dunbar, “Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Dec. 1993, 16(4):681-694. [cited by applicant]
Galashov et al., “Information asymmetry in kl-regularized rl,” CoRR, May 3, 2019, arXiv:1905.01240, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Harnad, “The symbol grounding problem,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Jun. 1990, 42(1-3):335-346. [cited by applicant]
He et al., “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770-778. [cited by applicant]
Hill et al., “Robust instruction-following in a situated agent via transfer-learning from text,” ICLR, 2019, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/EP2022/084780, dated Mar. 7, 2023, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jang et al., “BC-0: Zero-shot task generalization with robotic imitation learning,” Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning, 2022, 164;991-1002. [cited by applicant]
Jessica Landon [online], “Creating Multimodal Interactive Agents with Imitation and Self-Supervised Learning,” Dec. 7, 2015, retrieved on Apr. 10, 2024, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFgRhviF7mY> [Video Submission]. [cited by applicant]
Kaplan et al., “Scaling laws for neural language models,” CoRR, Jan. 23, 2020, arXiv:2001.08361, 30 pages. [cited by applicant]
Khan et al., “Transformers in vision: a survey,” CoRR, Sep. 8, 2021, arXiv:2101.01169v3, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lake et al., “Word meaning in minds and machines,” Psychological Review, 2021, 130(2):401-431. [cited by applicant]
Laland, “Social learning strategies,” Animal Learning & Behavior, Feb. 2004, 32(1):4-14. [cited by applicant]
Landi et al., “Perceive, Transform, and Act: Multi-Modal Attention Networks for Vision and Language Navigation,” CoRR, Nov. 27, 2019, arXiv;1911.12377v1, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lynch et al., “Grounding language in play,” CoRR, May 15, 2020, arXiv:2005.07648, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
McClelland et al., “Extending machine language models toward human-level language understanding,” CoRR, Dec. 12, 2019, arXiv:1912.05877, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ortega et al., “Shaking the foundations: delusions in sequence models for interaction and control,” CoRR, Oct. 20, 2021, arXiv:2110.10819, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Osa et al., “An algorithmic perspective on imitation learning,” CoRR, Nov. 16, 2018, arXiv:1811.06711, 188 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pomerleau, “Alvinn: An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1988, pp. 305-313. [cited by applicant]
Radford et al., “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI Blog, 2019, 1(8):9. [cited by applicant]
Ross et al., “A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning,” Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2011, pp. 627-635. [cited by applicant]
Roy et al., “The human speechome project,” International Workshop on Emergence and Evolution of Linguistic Communication, 2006, pp. 192-196. [cited by applicant]
Santoro et al., “Symbolic behaviour in artificial intelligence,” CoRR, Feb. 5, 2021, arXiv:2102.03406, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schaal, “Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Jun. 1, 1999, 3(6):233-242. [cited by applicant]
Seo et al., “Look before you speak: Visually contextualized utterances,” 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Jun. 20, 2021, 16872-16882. [cited by applicant]
Silver et al., “Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search,” Nature, 2016, 529(7587):484-489. [cited by applicant]
Sullivan et al., “SAYcam: A large, longitudinal audiovisual dataset recorded from the infant's perspective,” Open Mind, May 26, 2021, 5:20-29. [cited by applicant]
Turing, “Computing machinery and intelligence,” Mind, Oct. 1950, LIX(236):433-460. [cited by applicant]
Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, pp. 5998-6008. [cited by applicant]
Vinyals et al., “Grandmaster level in starcraft II using multi-agent reinforcement learning,” Nature, Oct. 30, 2019, 575(7782):350-354. [cited by applicant]
Ward et al., “Using unity to help solve intelligence,” CoRR, Nov. 18, 2022, arXiv:2011.09294, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Winograd, “Understanding natural language,” Cognitive Psychology, Jan. 1972, 3(1):1-191. [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Cvt: Introducing convolutions to vision transformers,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021, pp. 22-31. [cited by applicant]
Yoshida et al., “What's in view for toddlers? Using a head camera to study visual experience,” Infancy, May-Jun. 2008, 13(3):229-248. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance in Japanese Appln. No. 2024-521004, mailed on Mar. 25, 2025, 5 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]