IP Library Patent Application 18079818
Patent Application
App. No. 18/079,818

METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING REPRESENTATIVES FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN CONCEPTS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/079,818
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a computer-implemented method for performing a design process by processing design data of a physical object. The method includes acquiring a dataset including design data samples of design data, determining at least one design concept including design data samples from the acquired dataset based on at least a similarity of feature values of design features, calculating a local similarity measure between at least two description spaces for each design data sample included in the determined design concept, selecting a number of design data samples based on the calculated local similarity measure as most representative designs and least representative designs, outputting the selected most representative design to an engineering process for further processing or deleting the least representative design from the design data samples of the respective design concept, and processing at least one of the most representative design data samples in the engineering process.

Claims (65)

1 . A computer-implemented method for performing a design process by processing design data of a physical object, the method comprising steps of:

acquiring a dataset D including a plurality of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of design data, each design data sample x i representing one design variation of the physical object and comprising a plurality of design features f 1 , . . . , f N F , each design feature f i included in at least one of a plurality of description spaces;

determining at least one design concept including a plurality of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D from the acquired dataset D based on at least a similarity of feature values of the design features f 1 , . . . , f N F , wherein each design data sample x 1 , . . . , x N D comprises design features in at least two of the description spaces;

calculating a local similarity measure between the at least two description spaces for each design data sample x 1 , . . . , x N D included in the determined at least one design concept;

selecting a number of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D based on the calculated local similarity measure from the plurality of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D included in the determined at least one design concept as at least one of most representative designs and least representative designs; and

outputting the selected most representative design(s) to an engineering process for further processing, or deleting the least representative design(s) from the design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the respective design concept; and

processing at least one of the most representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept in the engineering process.

2 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , comprising:

determining relevant description spaces of the plurality of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept; and

calculating the local similarity measure as a correlation between the design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D in different description spaces of the determined relevant description spaces of the plurality of design data samples of the at least one design concept.

3 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

the at least two description spaces include at least two of the description space of design specification parameters, geometrical features of the design, design performance parameters of at least one engineering discipline for one set of operation criteria, and an operation mode of the design.

4 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

calculating the local similarity measure as local mutual information measure defined by

i

(

x

;

y

)

=

log

p

(

x

"\[LeftBracketingBar]"

y

)

p

(

x

)

,

with the local similarity measure i(x; y), x and y are design data of the design data sample in the respective description spaces and p (x) defines a probability of occurrence of the characteristic data sample x in the first description space, and p (x|y) defines a probability of occurrence of the design data sample x in the first description space when observing the design data sample y in the second description space.

5 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

processing the most representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept in the engineering process includes optimizing the representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D with respect to at least one design target using the at least on representative design data sample x 1 , . . . , x N D as a starting point for the optimization process.

6 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 2 , wherein

determining relevant description spaces includes the description spaces design specification subspace and design performance subspace, and

processing the most representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept in the engineering process includes varying design parameters in the description space of design specification parameters for the at least one representative design for developing design variants of the at least one design concept.

7 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

processing the representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept in the engineering process includes storing the representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept as a reduced data set of the design concept.

8 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

the determined at least one design concept includes the plurality of design data samples fulfilling constraints of

each design data sample x 1 , . . . , x N D is included in at maximum one design concept, and

all design features f 1 , . . . , f N F of all design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept are similar, and

all design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D assigned to the at least one design concept in a joint description space including all description spaces are assigned to the same at least one design concept in each of the description space of the plurality of description spaces.

9 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , further comprising steps of:

determining at least one design concept including a plurality of design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D from the acquired a dataset D comprising:

determining plural concept candidates from the obtained dataset D based on at least a similarity of feature values of the design features f 1 , . . . , f N F , each concept candidate including a group of design data samples, for generating plural concept candidate configurations;

calculating a metric Q for the concept candidate configurations, the calculated metric Q defining a quality of the generated concept candidate configurations, the metric Q evaluating the design features f 1 , . . . , f N F of different description spaces of the plurality of description spaces; and

evaluating the plural concept candidate configurations based on the calculated metric Q to generate the at least one design concept.

10 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

the similarity of feature values of the design features f 1 , . . . , f N F includes at least a similarity in a first description space, in a second description space and in a third description space.

11 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 9 , wherein

processing the representative design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of the at least one design concept in the engineering process includes optimizing a design of the physical object based on a fitness function, wherein the fitness function is based on at least one of the calculated metric Q and the selection criterion.

12 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein

the dataset includes design data samples x 1 , . . . , x N D of engineering design data, each data sample x i representing a design of the physical object,

each of the plural description spaces is characterized by a single design feature f i or a group of design features f i , f j , . . . , wherein the group of design features f i , f j , . . . includes one of a set of design data parameters of the physical object, a set of geometrical features of the physical object, a set of performance values of the physical object for defined conditions, and a latent representation of a machine learning approach.

13 . The computer-implemented method according to claim 12 , wherein the machine learning approach is an auto-encoder or a principal/independent component analysis PCA/ICA.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2025
From: HONDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE EUROPE GMBH
To: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 070614/0186 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 20, 2023
From: LANFERMANN, FELIX; WOLLSTADT, PATRICIA
To: HONDA RESEARCH INSTITUTE EUROPE GMBH
Reel/Frame 062739/0257 →