IP Library Granted Patent US 12,401,674
Granted Patent B2
US 12,401,674 · App. 18/082,724 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Systems and methods for detecting vulnerabilities in internet-of-things (IOT) devices

Inventors: Dinil Divakaran (Singapore, SG); Serg Bell (Costa del Sol, SG); Stanislav Protasov (Singapore, SG); Philipp Gysel (Bern, CH)
Assignee: Acronis International GmbH
H04L63/1433
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,401,674
App. No.
18/082,724
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed herein are systems and method for detecting vulnerabilities in devices within a network. In one exemplary aspect, a method includes: intercepting a plurality of packets in a network with a plurality of devices; identifying a subset of packets corresponding to a first device of the network; extracting and embedding a plurality of features representing device behavior from the subset of packets into an input vector; executing a machine learning algorithm that receives the input vector and outputs a device type of the first device, wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained using a training dataset including network traffic information labelled with device types and a list of attributes of each respective device type; performing, for the first device, a security scan specific to the device type; and in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the security scan, generating a vulnerability assessment report for the first device.

Claims (60)

1. A method for detecting vulnerabilities in devices within a network, the method comprising:

intercepting a plurality of packets being transmitted in a network with a plurality of devices;

identifying, from the plurality of packets, a subset of packets corresponding to a first device of the network;

extracting a plurality of features representing device behavior from the subset of packets;

embedding the plurality of features into an input vector;

executing a machine learning algorithm that receives the input vector and outputs a device type of the first device, wherein the machine learning algorithm has a zero-shot framework and is trained using a training dataset comprising network traffic information pre-labelled into a set of seen device types and a list of attributes of each respective device type of the seen device types, wherein an attribute in the list comprises a relationship of each device of a particular device type with other devices, and wherein a true device type of the first device is not in the seen device types;

performing, for the first device, a security scan specific to the device type classified by the machine learning algorithm to detect vulnerabilities in the first device; and

in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the security scan, generating a vulnerability assessment report for the first device.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a different security scan is performed for a different device type.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

identifying, from the plurality of packets, another subset of packets corresponding to a second device of the network;

extracting another plurality of features representing device behavior from the another subset of packets;

embedding the another plurality of features into another input vector;

executing the machine learning algorithm that receives the another input vector and outputs the different device type of the second device;

performing, for the second device, the different security scan specific to the different device type to detect vulnerabilities in the second device; and

in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the different security scan, generating a vulnerability assessment report for the second device.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the subset of packets comprises:

determining a device identifier in a first packet of the plurality of packets; and

identifying, from the plurality of packets, the subset of packets that include the device identifier.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning algorithm further outputs a respective prediction probability that indicates an accuracy of a predicted device type, further comprising:

performing, for the first device, the security scan in response to determining that a prediction probability associated with the first device is greater than a threshold probability.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the security scan is not performed for devices for which prediction probabilities associated with corresponding predictions are not greater than the threshold probability.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of features are one or both of: sequence-based features obtained by extracting raw values for each packet in a continuous sequence, and aggregation-based features obtained by engineering aggregate features from network traffic sessions, wherein a network traffic session is a time-window of packets generated by a given device.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein an attribute of the list of attributes describes one of: a type of device and a network parameter of the device.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising performing a remediation action that resolves the detected vulnerability of the first device.

10. A system for detecting vulnerabilities in devices within a network, comprising:

a memory; and

a hardware processor communicatively coupled with the memory and configured to:

intercept a plurality of packets being transmitted in a network with a plurality of devices;

identify, from the plurality of packets, a subset of packets corresponding to a first device of the network;

extract a plurality of features representing device behavior from the subset of packets;

embed the plurality of features into an input vector;

execute a machine learning algorithm that receives the input vector and outputs a device type of the first device, wherein the machine learning algorithm has a zero-shot framework and is trained using a training dataset comprising network traffic information pre-labelled into set of seen device types and a list of attributes of each respective device type of the seen device types, wherein an attribute in the list comprises a relationship of each device of a particular device type with other devices, and wherein a true device type of the first device is not in the seen device types;

perform, for the first device, a security scan specific to the device type classified by the machine learning algorithm to detect vulnerabilities in the first device; and

in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the security scan, generate a vulnerability assessment report for the first device.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein a different security scan is performed for a different device type.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured to:

identify, from the plurality of packets, another subset of packets corresponding to a second device of the network;

extract another plurality of features representing device behavior from the another subset of packets;

embed the another plurality of features into another input vector;

execute the machine learning algorithm that receives the another input vector and outputs the different device type of the second device;

perform, for the second device, the different security scan specific to the different device type to detect vulnerabilities in the second device; and

in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the different security scan, generate a vulnerability assessment report for the second device.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the hardware processor is further configured to identify the subset of packets by:

determining a device identifier in a first packet of the plurality of packets; and

identifying, from the plurality of packets, the subset of packets that include the device identifier.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the machine learning algorithm further outputs a respective prediction probability that indicates an accuracy of a predicted device type, wherein the hardware processor is further configured to:

perform, for the first device, the security scan in response to determining that a prediction probability associated with the first device is greater than a threshold probability.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the security scan is not performed for devices for which prediction probabilities associated with corresponding predictions are not greater than the threshold probability.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of features are one or both of:

sequence-based features obtained by extracting raw values for each packet in a continuous sequence, and aggregation-based features obtained by engineering aggregate features from network traffic sessions, wherein a network traffic session is a time-window of packets generated by a given device.

17. The system of claim 10 , wherein an attribute of the list of attributes describes one of: a type of device and a network parameter of the device.

18. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing thereon computer executable instructions for detecting vulnerabilities in devices within a network, including instructions for:

intercepting a plurality of packets being transmitted in a network with a plurality of devices;

identifying, from the plurality of packets, a subset of packets corresponding to a first device of the network;

extracting a plurality of features representing device behavior from the subset of packets;

embedding the plurality of features into an input vector;

executing a machine learning algorithm that receives the input vector and outputs a device type of the first device, wherein the machine learning algorithm has a zero-shot framework and is trained using a training dataset comprising network traffic information pre-labelled into a set of seen device types and a list of attributes of each respective device type of the seen device types, wherein an attribute in the list comprises a relationship of each device of a particular device type with other devices, and wherein a true device type of the first device is not in the seen device types;

performing, for the first device, a security scan specific to the device type classified by the machine learning algorithm to detect vulnerabilities in the first device; and

in response to detecting a vulnerability based on the security scan, generating a vulnerability assessment report for the first device.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2025
From: DIVAKARAN, DINIL; BELL, SERG; PROTASOV, STANISLAV; GYSEL, PHILIPP
To: ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Reel/Frame 071930/0187 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENTS LISTED BY DELETING PATENT APPLICATION NO. 18388907 FROM SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 66797 FRAME 766. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Nov 13, 2024
From: ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
Reel/Frame 069594/0136 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2024
From: ACRONIS INTERNATIONAL GMBH
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST
Reel/Frame 066797/0766 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240205257A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (20)
US 9210176B2 · Sobel · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 11115799B1 · Du · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20190166091A1 · Gupta · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190306023A1 · Vasseur · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200160100A1 · Mermoud · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200396129A1 · Tedaldi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210377215A1 · Wang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210406720A1 · Song · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220245258A1 · Shivanna · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230384746A1 · Reynolds · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240095779A1 · Maity · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240205257A1 · Divakaran · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020118376A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Yair et al., “ProfilloT: a machine learning approach for IoT device identification based on network traffic analysis,” In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 506-509, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Thangavelu et al. “DEFT: A Distributed IoT Fingerprinting Technique,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 940-952, Feb. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Pinheiro et al., “Identifying IoT devices and events based on packet length from encrypted traffic.” Computer Communications, vol. 144, pp. 8-17, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Dong et al., “Your Smart Home Can't Keep a Secret: Towards Automated Fingerprinting of IoT Traffic,” In ACM Asia Conf. on Computer and Communications, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Trimananda et al. “Packet-level signatures for smart home devices,” In Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS) Symposium, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., “You Are What You Broadcast: Identification of Mobile and IoT Devices from (Public) WiFi,” In 29th USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 55-72, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chakraborty et al., “Cost-aware Feature Selection for IoT Device Classification,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2021. [cited by applicant]