IP Library Granted Patent US 12,488,675
Granted Patent B2
US 12,488,675 · App. 18/090,978 · Granted Dec 2, 2025

Premises monitoring systems with assessment and corrective action functionality

Inventor: Mark Reimer (Denver, CO)
Assignee: The ADT Security Corporation
G08B25/10H04W12/009H04W84/18
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,488,675
App. No.
18/090,978
Granted
Dec 2, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An assessment device for a premises security system that is configured to monitor a premises is provided. The assessment device includes processing circuitry configured to monitor a metric associated with a mesh network or a power level associated with the premises security system, determine that the metric fails to meet a system health criteria, in response to determining that the metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform at least one assessment of the premises security system, and determine at least one action to implement to cause the metric to meet the system health criteria where the at least one action is based on the at least one assessment of the premises security system.

Claims (81)

1 . An assessment device for a premises security system that is configured to monitor a premises via a plurality of premises devices that include a first premises device, the assessment device comprising:

processing circuitry configured to:

monitor at least one metric associated with the premises security system, the at least one metric comprising a first metric that is associated with wireless connectivity between the first premises device and a wireless base station of the premises security system;

determine that the first metric fails to meet a system health criteria due to a wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station;

in response to determining that the first metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform a first assessment, the first assessment comprising:

determine a logical identifier of a wireless mesh network is no longer detectable;

determine a medium access control (MAC) address associated with a logical identifier of a detectable wireless network;

determine the MAC address of the detectable wireless network matches to a stored MAC address associated with the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network; and

automatically connect to the wireless mesh network using an updated logical identifier associated with the MAC address; and

determine a first action to implement to correct the wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station based on the first assessment.

2 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the first action comprises modifying a setting of the premises security system to generate a modified setting, the modified setting being configured to correct the wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station.

3 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a second metric; and

the processing circuitry is further configured to:

determine the second metric fails to meet the system health criteria, the second metric indicating a change in the wireless mesh network;

in response to the determining that the second metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform a second assessment of the premises security system by at least determining that a device of the premises security system has been added or removed to the wireless mesh network;

determine a second action to implement to cause the second metric to meet the system health criteria, the second action comprising rebuilding a routing table for the wireless mesh network.

4 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a frame error metric indicating a frame error rate in the wireless mesh network associated with the premises security system; and

the processing circuitry is configured to:

determine that the frame error metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to determining that the frame error metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform a link assessment of the premises security system by at least determining that a communication link in the wireless mesh network is no longer operational; and

determine a routing table action to implement to cause the frame error metric to meet the system health criteria, the routing table action comprising:

logically removing the communication link from a routing table of the mesh network; and

rebuilding the routing table of the wireless mesh network.

5 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a power metric indicating a power level of a battery; and

the processing circuitry is configured to:

determine that the power metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to determining that the power metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform a power assessment by at least:

determining a power level of the battery has changed by a predefined amount; and

determining an ambient temperature of the premises;

determine a power action to implement based on the power assessment.

6 . The assessment device of claim 5 , wherein the power action comprises generating a notification indicating that the battery requires replacement.

7 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the first action comprises:

generating a prompt for information associated with the first assessment; and

modifying a setting of the premises security system based on the information.

8 . The assessment device of claim 7 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a network noise metric that is configured to indicate a level of noise in the mesh network; and

the processing circuitry is further configured to:

determine that the network noise metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to the determining that the network noise metric fails to meet the system health criteria, perform a network noise assessment of the premises security system; and

determine a network noise action to implement to cause the network noise metric to meet the system health criteria.

9 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network is a service set identifier (SSID).

10 . The assessment device of claim 1 , wherein the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network is a pre-shared key (PSK).

11 . A method implemented by an assessment device for a premises security system that is configured to monitor a premises via a plurality of premises devices that include a first premises device, the method comprising:

monitoring at least one metric associated with the premises security system, the at least one metric comprising a first metric that is associated with wireless connectivity between the first premises device and a wireless base station of the premises security system;

determining that the first metric fails to meet a system health criteria due to a wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station;

in response to determining that the first metric fails to meet the system health criteria, performing a first assessment, the first assessment comprising;

determining a logical identifier of a wireless mesh network is no longer detectable;

determining a medium access control (MAC) address associated with a logical identifier of a detectable wireless network;

determining the MAC address of the detectable wireless network matches to a stored MAC address associated with the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network; and

automatically connecting to the wireless mesh network using an updated logical identifier associated with the MAC address; and

determining a first action to implement to correct the wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station based on the first assessment.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the first action comprises modifying a setting of the premises security system to generate a modified setting, the modified setting being configured to correct the wireless connectivity failure between the first premises device and the wireless base station.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a second metric; and

the method further comprising:

determining the second metric fails to meet the system health criteria, the second metric indicating a change in the wireless mesh network;

in response to the determining that the second metric fails to meet the system health criteria, performing a second assessment of the premises security system by at least determining that a device of the premises security system has been added or removed to the wireless mesh network;

determining a second action to implement to cause the second metric to meet the system health criteria, the second action comprising rebuilding a routing table for the wireless mesh network.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a frame error metric indicating a frame error rate in the wireless mesh network associated with the premises security system; and

the method further comprises:

determining that the frame error metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to determining that the frame error metric fails to meet the system health criteria, performing a link assessment of the premises security system by at least determining that a communication link in the wireless mesh network is no longer operational; and

determining a routing table action to implement to cause the frame error metric to meet the system health criteria, the routing table action comprising:

logically removing the communication link from a routing table of the mesh network; and

rebuilding the routing table of the wireless mesh network.

15 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a power metric indicating a power level of a battery; and

the method further comprises:

determining that the power metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to determining that the power metric fails to meet the system health criteria, performing a power assessment by at least:

determining a power level of the battery has changed by a predefined amount; and

determining an ambient temperature of the premises; and

determining a power action to implement based on the power assessment.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the power action comprises generating a notification indicating that the battery requires replacement.

17 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the first action comprises:

generating a prompt for information associated with the first assessment; and

modifying a setting of the premises security system based on the information.

18 . The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one metric comprises a network noise metric that is configured to indicate a level of noise in the mesh network; and

the method further comprising:

determining that the network noise metric fails to meet the system health criteria;

in response to the determining that the network noise metric fails to meet the system health criteria, performing a network noise assessment of the premises security system; and

determining a network noise action to implement to cause the network noise metric to meet the system health criteria.

19 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network is a service set identifier (SSID).

20 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the logical identifier of the wireless mesh network is a service set identifier (SSID).

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2023
From: THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 063489/0434 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2023
From: REIMER, MARK
To: THE ADT SECURITY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062691/0785 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240221491A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 10194276B1 · Singamsetty et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20060253712A1 · Armingaud et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080219239A1 · Bell et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080300046A1 · Gagner · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20110110345A1 · Heidari · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140266678A1 · Shapiro · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160034010A1 · Gettings · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160034359A1 · Cabrera et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180011461A1 · Camarasa · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200136956A1 · Neshat · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200235607A1 · Kanarellis et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200244734A1 · Mendiola et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210211349A1 · Grant · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210288868A1 · Yao · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210409302A1 · Kahn · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220212793A1 · Rezvani · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230156552A1 · Robertson · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO 2020041371A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022040191A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]