IP Library Granted Patent US 12,377,610
Granted Patent B2
US 12,377,610 · App. 18/098,942 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Manufacturing methods and systems including digital twin managing process, lifecycle, and instance

Inventors: Morad Behandish (San Mateo, CA); Matthew Patterson (Raleigh, NC); Soren Taverniers (Palo Alto, CA); Dogan Timucin (Santa Cruz, CA); Christoforos Somarakis (Gilroy, CA); Svyatoslav Korneev (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Xerox Corporation
B29C64/393B22F10/85B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y50/02G05B19/41885B22F10/28B29C64/153
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,377,610
App. No.
18/098,942
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

This disclosure provides techniques for manufacturing parts using digital twin(s) to manage various aspects of the manufacturing system. An example method may include representing a manufacturing system using a digital twin. In some cases, representing the manufacturing system includes modeling, in the digital twin, digital representations that correspond to a number of physical components of the manufacturing system. The physical components include at least: a manufacturing material, a working environment for deposition of the manufacturing material (e.g., for additive manufacturing), a tool to manipulate the manufacturing material between at least two matter states in the working environment, and sensors measuring behaviors of the tool, the working environment, and the manufacturing material. The method may further include receiving a manufacturing production task. The task may include a digital model of a part to be manufactured and default parameters for the manufacturing material(s), the working environment, and the tool.

Claims (45)

1. A method for manufacturing parts, the method comprising:

representing a manufacturing system using a digital twin, wherein representing the manufacturing system comprises modeling, in the digital twin, digital representations that respectively correspond to a plurality of physical components of the manufacturing system, the plurality of physical components including at least: a manufacturing material, a working environment for deposition of the manufacturing material, a tool to manipulate the manufacturing material between at least two matter states in the working environment, and a plurality of sensors respectively measuring behaviors of the tool, the working environment, and the manufacturing material, wherein at least one of the digital representations corresponding to the working environment models a building platform and ambient temperature control based on measurements by the plurality of sensors respectively measuring behaviors of the tool, the working environment, and the manufacturing material;

receiving a manufacturing production task;

performing, in the digital twin, a simulation of the manufacturing production task to identify one or more production parameters to apply in the working environment, the tool, or both; and

executing the manufacturing production task using the tool in the working environment based on the one or more production parameters identified in the digital twin, wherein the digital twin represents the manufacturing system in a progression state including local representations of coalescence properties, and a global heat transfer state that includes a global representation of the manufacturing production task, both the local representation and the global representation in communication with a global state of an as-printed part of the manufacturing production task, the as-printed part monitored by the plurality of sensors and simulated in the digital twin.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

monitoring the manufacturing production task using the plurality of sensors;

based on measurements by the plurality of sensors, updating, in the digital twin, the one or more production parameters in the simulation of the manufacturing production task; and

updating the executing the manufacturing production task based on the updated one or more production parameters identified in the digital twin.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein performing, in the digital twin, the simulation of the manufacturing production task comprises:

simulating a deposition of the manufacturing material in a liquid state under a first set of thermal conditions;

simulating a solidification of the manufacturing material under a second set of thermal conditions; and

comparing a simulated solidified portion of the manufacturing material to a corresponding characteristic in the manufacturing production task.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein performing, in the digital twin, the simulation of the manufacturing production task to identify the one or more production parameters comprises:

based on a difference between the simulated solidified portion of the manufacturing material and the corresponding characteristic in the manufacturing production task, updating the first set of thermal conditions, the second set of thermal conditions, or both;

updating, based on the updated first set of thermal conditions, the updated second set of thermal conditions, or both, the simulated solidified portion of the manufacturing material; and

upon determining that the difference between the updated simulated solidified portion of the manufacturing material and the corresponding characteristic in the manufacturing production task is smaller than a threshold value, identifying the one or more production parameters based on the updated first set of thermal conditions, the updated second set of thermal conditions, or both.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the corresponding characteristic comprises at least one of:

a corresponding geometry;

a corresponding porosity;

a corresponding surface roughness;

a corresponding fatigue property;

a corresponding tensile strength property; or

a corresponding stress level.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein executing the manufacturing production task using the tool in the working environment based on the one or more production parameters identified in the digital twin comprises:

monitoring, using the plurality of sensors, a local deposition of the manufacturing material by the tool in the working environment;

monitoring, using the plurality of sensors, a movement of the tool;

monitoring, using the plurality of sensors, an actually solidified portion of the manufacturing material deposited by the tool in the working environment; and

updating one or more progression parameters for the local deposition of the manufacturing material based on a difference between the actually solidified portion of the manufacturing material and a corresponding simulated solidified portion in the digital twin, wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a plurality of cameras providing computer visions for respectively monitoring the local deposition, the movement of the tool, and the actually solidified portion of the manufacturing material.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the plurality of sensors further comprises a pyrometer for measuring a global heat transfer in the working environment and providing measurements of the global heat transfer to a corresponding simulation of the local deposition in the digital twin for updating the one or more production parameters.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tool comprises at least one of:

a deposition unit comprising a heating element and a deposition nozzle to melt and deposit the manufacturing material in the working environment, wherein the manufacturing material comprises a molten form of metal, glass, or thermoplastic; or

a sintering unit comprising a layering mechanism and a laser to fuse a layer of the manufacturing material in the working environment, wherein the manufacturing material comprises a powder form of metal, glass, or thermoplastic.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein executing the manufacturing production task comprises at least one of:

performing additive manufacturing; or

performing subtractive manufacturing using a plurality of tools to remove material added during or after the additive manufacturing.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein representing the manufacturing system using the digital twin comprises:

retrieving, in a computational infrastructure, previous production parameters and system test results of the manufacturing system;

performing the simulation in the digital twin based on the previous production parameters and system test results; and

updating, based on the simulation, the one or more production parameters to apply in the working environment, the tool, or both, wherein the computational infrastructure comprises one or more application programming interfaces (APIs) to communicate changes of the plurality of physical components of the manufacturing system and corresponding digital representations in the digital twin.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executed by a processing device for manufacturing parts, cause the processing device to:

represent a manufacturing system using a digital twin, wherein representing the manufacturing system comprises modeling, in the digital twin, digital representations that respectively correspond to a plurality of physical components of the manufacturing system, the plurality of physical components including at least: a manufacturing material, a working environment for deposition of the manufacturing material, a tool to manipulate the manufacturing material between at least two matter states in the working environment, and a plurality of sensors respectively measuring behaviors of the tool, the working environment, and the manufacturing material, wherein at least one of the digital representations corresponding to the working environment models a building platform and ambient temperature control based on measurements by the plurality of sensors respectively measuring behaviors of the tool, the working environment, and the manufacturing material;

receive a manufacturing production task;

perform, in the digital twin, a simulation of the manufacturing production task to identify one or more production parameters to apply in the working environment, the tool, or both; and

execute the manufacturing production task using the tool in the working environment based on the one or more production parameters identified in the digital twin, wherein the digital twin represents the manufacturing system in a progression state including local representations of coalescence properties, and a global heat transfer state that includes a global representation of the manufacturing production task, both the local representation and the global representation in communication with a global state of an as-printed part of the manufacturing production task, the as-printed part monitored by the plurality of sensors and simulated in the digital twin.

Assignments (7)
SECOND LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071785/0550 →
FIRST LIEN NOTES PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 11, 2025
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070824/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066741/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 20, 2023
From: XEROX CORPORATION
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065628/0019 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF US PATENTS 9356603, 10026651, 10626048 AND INCLUSION OF US PATENT 7167871 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 064038 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 28, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064161/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 20, 2023
From: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
To: XEROX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 064038/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2023
From: BEHANDISH, MORAD; PATTERSON, MATTHEW; TAVERNIERS, SOREN; TIMUCIN, DOGAN; SOMARAKIS, CHRISTOFOROS; KORNEEV, SVYATOSLAV
To: PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 062508/0799 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240246297A1 · Jul 25, 2024
References Cited (11)
US 20160185048A1 · Dave · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180341248A1 · Mehr · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190004079A1 · Blom · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190184494A1 · Bennett · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200331209A1 · Ong · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200398379A1 · Reznik · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220134433A1 · McFarland · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220161329A1 · Tsai · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20240033998A1 · Stramigioli · 2024 [cited by examiner]
Herlyn, W., et al., “Mastering the Supply Chain by a Concept of a Digital Control-Twin”, Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL)—29, published in: Data Science and Innovation in Supply Ch… [cited by applicant]
Shaw, K., et al., “What is digital twin and why it's important to IoT”, Network Word, Mar. 17, 2022, IDG Communications, Inc. [cited by applicant]