IP Library Granted Patent US 12,582,343
Granted Patent B2
US 12,582,343 · App. 18/106,243 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Methods and systems for wavelength mapping cardiac fibrillation and optimizing ablation lesion placement

Inventor: Peter S. Spector (Colchester, VT)
Assignee: University of Vermont and State Agricultural College
A61B5/316A61B5/287A61B5/361A61B18/14A61B2017/00053A61B18/1492A61B34/20A61B2034/2051A61B2562/046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,582,343
App. No.
18/106,243
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system that executes a process for mapping cardiac fibrillation and optimizing ablation treatments. The process, in some embodiments, includes: positioning a two dimensional electrode array to several locations in a patient's heart and at each location, obtaining a conduction velocity and a cycle length measurement from at least two local signals in response to electrical activity in the cardiac tissue. In some embodiments, a regional wavelength is calculated by multiplying the local conduction velocity with the local minimum cycle length. The system can then create a wavelength distribution map that identifies the location of the drivers in the heart. In certain embodiments, the system uses variability of conduction velocity and cycle length in an area to determine the driver type. In some embodiments, the system calculates average distance of drivers to non-conductive tissue boundaries. The system then selects ablation placements that maximize treatment efficacy while minimizing tissue damage.

Claims (27)

1 . A method for mapping cardiac fibrillation in a patient, comprising:

(a) providing a system for measuring cardiac fibrillation, wherein the system comprises:

a two dimensional electrode array positioned at a first location on a patient's heart, wherein the two dimensional electrode array comprises at least a first electrode pair and a second electrode pair, wherein the first electrode pair is configured to detect a first local signal, and wherein the second electrode pair is configured to detect a second local signal,

an ablation electrode, and

a processing unit coupled to the two dimensional array;

(b) registering, via the system, the location of the first electrode pair and the second electrode pair, wherein the first electrode pair and the second electrode pair are separated by a distance;

(c) obtaining, via the system, a first conduction velocity measurement from the first local signal and the second local signal in response to electrical activity in the cardiac tissue, wherein the conduction velocity measurement is determined from a time difference between the first and the second local signals and the distance between the first electrode pair and the second electrode pair;

(d) obtaining, via the system, a first cycle length measurement from the first local signal in response to the electrical activity in the cardiac tissue, wherein the first cycle length measurement is determined by a time difference between a first excitation and a second excitation detected in the first local signal; and

(e) calculating, via the system, a first regional wavelength by multiplying the first conduction velocity measurement obtained in (c) and the first cycle length measurement obtained in (d); and

(f) ablating the cardiac tissue at a driver location identified using the first regional wavelength.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

moving the two dimensional electrode array to a second location of the patient's heart to obtain a second conduction velocity measurement and a second cycle length measurement; and

calculating a second regional wavelength by multiplying the second conduction velocity measurement and the second cycle length measurement.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the second location of the patient's heart does not overlap with the first location of the patient's heart.

4 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

creating a wavelength distribution map for the patient's heart based on at least the first and the second regional wavelength.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising:

identifying the driver location based on the wavelength distribution map that was created based on at least the first and the second regional wavelength.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first local signal is obtained by a difference in electrical activity obtained from the first electrode and the second electrode in the first electrode pair.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining the conduction velocity measure further comprises:

identifying a first wave activation time at the first electrode pair, a second wave activation time at the second electrode pair, and a set of additional wave activation times at one or more electrode pairs neighboring the first electrode pair;

determining a first-to-second time interval based on the time difference between the first wave activation time and the second wave activation time;

determining a set of time intervals based on the time difference between the first wave activation time and the set of additional wave activation times at one or more electrode pairs neighboring the first electrode pair;

wherein the first-to-second time interval is the longest comparing to the set of time intervals; and

wherein the vector of the conduction velocity is in the direction from the first electrode pair to the second electrode pair.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the two dimensional array comprises recording electrodes and the ablation electrode.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the two dimensional array is able to both map cardiac fibrillation and perform the ablating step.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: SPECTOR, PETER S.
To: UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE
Reel/Frame 067163/0857 →
Continuity (6)
Division 16698873 · Nov 27, 2019
Continuation In Part 15627013 · Jun 19, 2017
Continuation 13844753 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 62773713 · Nov 30, 2018
Provisional Application 61753387 · Jan 16, 2013
Related Publication 20230329620A1 · Oct 19, 2023
References Cited (96)
US 5222501A · Ideker et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5385146A · Goldreyer · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5447529A · Marchlinski · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5637090A · McGee · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5681308A · Edwards et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5683424A · Brown et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5718241A · Ben-Haim et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5718701A · Shai · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5748491A · Allison et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5857977A · Caswell et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5860974A · Abele · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6023638A · Swanson · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6029091A · de la Rama · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6086581A · Reynolds et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6243603B1 · Ideker et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6978168B2 · Beatty et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7117030B2 · Berenfeld et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7505810B2 · Harlev et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7515954B2 · Harlev et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7957792B2 · Harlev et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8010186B1 · Ryu · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 9033893B2 · Spector · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9254093B2 · Spector · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9693699B2 · Spector et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9706935B2 · Spector · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10912476B2 · Spector · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11089987B2 · Spector · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11571160B2 · Spector · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030083613A1 · Schaer · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040019366A1 · Rottenberg et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040039293A1 · Porath · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050203502A1 · Boveja et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050267467A1 · Paul · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050288599A1 · MacAdam · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070005052A1 · Kampa · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070021679A1 · Narayan et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027390A1 · Maschke · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070032826A1 · Schwartz · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070049816A1 · Damiano et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070055167A1 · Bullinga · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070181139A1 · Hauck · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070208260A1 · Afonso · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070232949A1 · Saksena · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080033494A1 · Swerdlow · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080161671A1 · Voth · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080161799A1 · Stangenes · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080319331A1 · Zizzo · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090099563A1 · Ciaccio · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090204164A1 · Efimov et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090275827A1 · Aiken et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299355A1 · Bencini et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094274A1 · Narayan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100130836A1 · Malchano et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100137861A1 · Soroff et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100305433A1 · Harlev et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312095A1 · Jenkins et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110087120A1 · Krishnan · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110208054A1 · Stewart et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110251505A1 · Narayan · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130006131A1 · Narayan · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130026959A1 · Sonoda et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130296959A1 · Milbocker · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140052013A1 · Narayan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140052103A1 · Cully et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140107453A1 · Maskara et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140200429A1 · Spector et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140200430A1 · Spector · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140243641A1 · Boveja et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140371614A1 · Narayan · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160045123A1 · Bar-Tal et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170079542A1 · Spector · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170224414A1 · Weinkam et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180206920A1 · Pappone et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180235495A1 · Rubenstein · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180279896A1 · Ruppersberg · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 104434299A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 1750215A1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2347726A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
EP 2540222A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 11506647 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO 1996039929A1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
WO 2000025685A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012092016A1 · 2012 [cited by examiner]
WO 2012149128A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
Thompson, 2014, Improved spatial resolution and electrogram wave direction independence with the use of an orthogonal electrode configuration, J Clin Monitoring Comp 28:157-163. [cited by applicant]
Benson, 2014, Mapping multi-wavelet reentry without isochrones: an electrogram-guided approach to define substrate distribution, Eurospace 16:iv102-iv209. [cited by applicant]
Calkins, 2009, Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses, Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol 2(4):349-361. [cited by applicant]
Correa, 2011, Electrogram Fractionation: The Relationship Between Spatiotemporal Variation of Tissue Excitation and Electrode Spatial Resolution, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 4:909-916. [cited by applicant]
Dorostkar, 1998, Electroanatomical mapping and ablation of the substrate supporting intraatrial reentrant tachycardia after palliation for complex congenital heart disease, Pac Clin Electrophys 21(9):1810-1819. [cited by applicant]
Kojodjojo, 2007, Characterization of the electroanatomical substrate in human atrial fibrillation: the relationship between changes in atrial vol. refractoriness, wavefront propagation velocities, and AF burden, J Cardi… [cited by applicant]
Lang, 2006, Endocardial impedance mapping during curcumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation differentiates between atrial and venous tissue, Heart Rhytm, 3(2):171-178. [cited by applicant]
Matsuo, 2009, Clinical predictors of termination and clinical outcome of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation, J Am Coll Cardiol 54(9):788-795. [cited by applicant]
Palmer, 2015, Digital resolution enhancement of intracardiac excitation maps during atrial fibrillation, J Clin Monitoring Comp 29(2):279-289. [cited by applicant]
Spector, 2009, Meta-analysis of ablation of atrial flutter and supraventricular tachycardia, Am J Cardiol 104(5):671-677. [cited by applicant]
Spector, 2012, Ablation of multi-wavelet re-entry: general principles and in silico analyses, Eurospace 14(Suppl 5): v106-v111. [cited by applicant]
Stinnett-Donnelly, 2011, Effects of electrode size and spacing on the resolution of intracardiac electrograms, Coron Artery Dis 23(2):126-32. [cited by applicant]