IP Library Patent Application 18117665
Patent Application
App. No. 18/117,665

TWO-STEP RANDOM ACCESS PROCEDURE IN NEXT GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/117,665
Abstract

Some of the present implementations provide a method for a base station (BS) for performing a random access (RA) procedure. The method includes transmitting, to a UE, a system information block (SIB) including a two-step RA configuration with a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold, the SIB further indicating whether switching an RA procedure from a two-step type to a four-step type by the UE is allowed; and transmitting, to the UE, a four-step RA configuration, wherein: the UE determines whether a detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold once the RA procedure is triggered, and performs the RA procedure using the two-step type after determining that the detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold.

Claims (70)

1 . A method for a base station (BS) for performing a random access (RA) procedure, the method comprising:

transmitting, to a user equipment (UE), a system information block (SIB) comprising a two-step RA configuration with a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold, the SIB further indicating whether switching an RA procedure from a two-step type to a four-step type by the UE is allowed; and

transmitting, to the UE, a four-step RA configuration, wherein:

the UE determines whether a detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold once the RA procedure is triggered, and

performs the RA procedure using the two-step type after determining that the detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type comprises:

setting a counter to one;

transmitting, to the BS, a first message in a first step of the RA procedure using the two-step type; and

iteratively performing the following steps while the RA procedure uses the two-step type and the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful:

adding one to the counter,

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is less than a first threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is equal to the first threshold, switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the iteratively performing the following steps further comprises:

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is less than a second threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is equal to the second threshold, declaring, to an upper layer of the UE, a failure of the RA procedure.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type further comprises:

determining, after transmitting the first message to the BS, whether a second message from the BS in a second step of the RA procedure using the two-step type is received successfully, wherein:

the first message comprises a preamble and a payload, and

the second message comprises at least one response including at least one of contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type and fallback information.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the second message comprises a media access control (MAC) subheader of a MAC sub-Protocol Data Unit (subPDU) having at least one field that indicates whether the at least one response contains the contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type for indicating a successful RA procedure using the two-step type or the fallback information for transmitting a third message to the BS.

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein determining whether the RA procedure using the two-step type is successful comprises:

determining that the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful when the second message is not received successfully before an RA response time threshold has expired.

7 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the second message comprises a radio resource control (RRC) message that is a response message to an RRC procedure request indicated in the first message.

8 . A base station (BS), comprising:

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing one or more instructions for performing a random access (RA) procedure; and

at least one processor coupled to the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media, and configured to execute the one or more instructions to cause the BS to:

transmit, to a user equipment (UE), a system information block (SIB) comprising a two-step RA configuration with a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold, the SIB further indicating whether switching from a two-step type to a four-step type by the UE is allowed; and

transmit, to the UE, a four-step RA configuration, wherein:

the UE determines whether a detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold once the RA procedure is triggered, and

performs the RA procedure using the two-step type after determining that the detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold.

9 . The BS of claim 8 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type comprises:

setting a counter to one;

transmitting, to the BS, a first message in a first step of the RA procedure using the two-step type; and

iteratively performing the following steps while the RA procedure uses the two-step type and the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful:

adding one to the counter,

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is less than a first threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is equal to the first threshold, switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type.

10 . The BS of claim 9 , wherein the iteratively performing the following steps further comprises:

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is less than a second threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is equal to the second threshold, declaring, to an upper layer of the UE, a failure of the RA procedure.

11 . The BS of claim 9 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type further comprises:

determining, after transmitting the first message to the BS, whether a second message from the BS in a second step of the RA procedure using the two-step type is received successfully, wherein:

the first message comprises a preamble and a payload, and

the second message comprises at least one response including at least one of contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type and fallback information.

12 . The BS of claim 11 , wherein the second message comprises a media access control (MAC) subheader of a MAC sub-Protocol Data Unit (subPDU) having at least one field that indicates whether the at least one response contains the contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type for indicating a successful RA procedure using the two-step type or the fallback information for transmitting a third message to the BS.

13 . The BS of claim 11 , wherein determining whether the RA procedure using the two-step type is successful comprises:

determining that the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful when the second message is not received successfully before an RA response time threshold has expired.

14 . The BS of claim 11 , wherein the second message comprises a radio resource control (RRC) message that is a response message to an RRC procedure request indicated in the first mes sage.

15 . A method for a user equipment (UE) for performing a random access (RA) procedure, the method comprising:

receiving, from a base station (BS), a system information block (SIB) comprising a two-step RA configuration with a reference signal received power (RSRP) threshold, the SIB further indicating whether switching from a two-step type to a four-step type is allowed;

receiving, from the BS, a four-step RA configuration;

determining whether a detected RSRP exceeds the RSRP threshold once the RA procedure is triggered; and

performing the RA procedure using the two-step type after determining that the detected RSRP exceeds the received RSRP threshold.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type comprises:

setting a counter to one;

transmitting, to the BS, a first message in a first step of the RA procedure using the two-step type; and

iteratively performing the following steps while the RA procedure uses the two-step type and the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful:

adding one to the counter,

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is less than a first threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is allowed and the counter is equal to the first threshold, switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the iteratively performing the following steps further comprises:

when the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is less than a second threshold, transmitting another first message to the BS, and

in a case that the SIB indicates that switching the RA procedure from the two-step type to the four-step type is not allowed and the counter is equal to the second threshold, declaring, to an upper layer of the UE, a failure of the RA procedure.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein performing the RA procedure using the two-step type further comprises:

determining, after transmitting the first message to the BS, whether a second message from the BS in a second step of the RA procedure using the two-step type is received successfully, wherein:

the first message comprises a preamble and a payload, and

the second message comprises at least one response including at least one of contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type and fallback information.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the second message comprises a media access control (MAC) subheader of a MAC sub-Protocol Data Unit (subPDU) having at least one field that indicates whether the at least one response contains the contention resolution information associated with the RA procedure using the two-step type for indicating a successful RA procedure using the two-step type or the fallback information for transmitting a third message to the BS.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein determining whether the RA procedure using the two-step type is successful comprises:

determining that the RA procedure using the two-step type is not successful when the second message is not received successfully before an RA response time threshold has expired.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: FG INNOVATION COMPANY LIMITED
To: SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 069028/0718 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2023
From: CHEN, HUNG-CHEN; CHOU, CHIE-MING; SHIH, MEI-JU; WEI, CHIA-HUNG
To: FG INNOVATION COMPANY LIMITED
Reel/Frame 062891/0877 →