Evaporative emissions system vapor blocking valve leak diagnostic with a single pressure sensor

1 . A method of testing operability of a vapor blocking valve (VBV) in a first passageway fluidly arranged between a fuel tank and a carbon canister, the carbon canister is connected to an internal combustion engine via a purge valve, wherein a canister valve solenoid (CVS) is arranged in a second fluid passageway fluidly interconnecting the carbon canister and an atmospheric port, the method comprising:

a) closing the CVS;

b) opening the VBV;

c) obtaining a first desired pressure in the first passageway with the internal combustion engine running and the purge valve open, then closing the purge valve;

d) closing the VBV;

e) opening the CVS;

f) monitoring a first test pressure in the first passageway with a pressure sensor;

g) obtaining a second desired pressure in the first passageway by repeating steps a) to c);

h) opening the VBV;

i) opening the CVS;

j) monitoring a second test pressure in the first passageway with the pressure sensor;

k) comparing the first and second test pressures;

l) determining the VBV operability based upon the comparing step; and

wherein steps a) through l) are performed sequentially.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising a third passageway fluidly interconnecting the carbon canister and an engine, a purge valve arranged in the third passageway, wherein the first and second desired pressure obtaining steps are performed by exposing the first passageway to engine vacuum with the purge valve in an open position.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the first and second desired pressure obtaining steps are performed with the engine running.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second desired pressure obtaining steps are performed with the CVS closed.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the CVS opening steps fluidly connect the first passageway to the atmospheric port and ambient air.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second test pressure monitoring steps include storing at least one characteristic of each of the first and second test pressures, wherein the comparing step includes comparing the at least one characteristic of each of the first and second test pressures.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the at least one characteristic includes a pressure of each of the first and second test pressures after a predetermined testing time.

8 . The method of claim 6 , comprising the step of storing the VBV operability as a PASS or a FAIL.

9 . The method of claim 8 , comprising the step of communicating the stored VBV operability to an onboard diagnostic (OBD) controller, and the step of the OBD controller triggering a Check Engine light in response to the FAIL.

10 . The method of claim 1 , comprising a leak detection module (LDM) providing the atmospheric port, the LDM including the canister valve solenoid (CVS), a pump, a check valve and a pressure transducer, a first passage fluidly connecting the CVS to the atmospheric port, a second passage fluidly connecting the carbon canister to the pump through the check valve, the pump fluid arranged between the check valve and atmospheric port.

11 . A method of testing operability of a vapor blocking valve (VBV) in a first passageway fluidly arranged between a fuel tank and a carbon canister, wherein a canister valve solenoid (CVS) is arranged in a second fluid passageway fluidly interconnecting the carbon canister and an atmospheric port, the method comprising:

obtaining a first desired pressure in the first passageway;

closing the VBV;

opening the CVS;

monitoring a first test pressure in the first passageway with a pressure sensor;

obtaining a second desired pressure in the first passageway;

opening the VBV;

opening the CVS;

monitoring a second test pressure in the first passageway with the pressure sensor;

comparing the first and second test pressures;

determining the VBV operability based upon the comparing step; and

wherein the first and second test pressure monitoring steps include storing at least one characteristic of each of the first and second test pressures, wherein the comparing step includes comparing the at least one characteristic of each of the first and second test pressures, wherein the at least one characteristic includes a slope for each of the first and second test pressures.