Systems and methods for determining offer eligibility using a predicate logic tree against sets of input data
Example computer executable instructions for determining a consumer's offer eligibility using a predicate logic tree against sets of input data are provided. In particular, the disclosed examples recite a rewards engine capable of determining a consumer's offer eligibility using a predicate logic tree against sets of input data. The rewards engine applies rules that are relevant to a particular deal offered by a retail establishment to the consumer's records to determine the consumer's offer eligibility. In some examples, the rewards engine sorts or partially sorts some or all of the consumer's records to determine the consumer's offer eligibility.
1. A method, comprising:
identifying a plurality of rules of a deal offered by a retail establishment, wherein the plurality of rules have a nested AND/OR relationship in a predicate logic tree;
evaluating a first rule, as a first instance of a rule evaluation, with respect to a consumer record located in a data repository;
evaluating each rule, nested within the first rule, as a second instance of the rule evaluation, wherein:
the plurality of rules comprises a first rule type and a second rule type,
a rule of the first rule type comprises one or more additional rules,
a rule of the second rule type comprises one or more requirements, and
each additional rule is evaluated as a next instance of the rule evaluation;
selecting a plurality of a consumer records associated with a consumer;
associating the respective plurality of consumer records with a corresponding rule according to the predicate logic tree, wherein:
the one or more requirements of each rule are applied to a respective set of consumer records, and
the respective sets of consumer records for each rule are different sets selected from the consumer records;
evaluating the one or more requirements of each corresponding rule against the respective set of consumer records; and
resolving the nested AND/OR relationship of the plurality of rules.
2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of requirements comprises one or more simple conditions and one or more aggregations.
3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the one or more simple conditions comprise a requirement that is evaluated based on a current purchase of the consumer without reference to the consumer records of the consumer related to previous purchases.
4. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the one or more aggregations comprise a group aggregation that comprises a function that is evaluated based on the current purchase of the consumer without reference to the consumer records of the consumer related to previous purchases.
5. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the one or more aggregations comprise a global aggregation that comprises a function that is evaluated based on the consumer records of the consumer that is relevant to the deal offered by the retail establishment.
6. The method according to claim 1 , comprising sorting or partially sorting at least two consumer records of the plurality of consumer records.
7. The method according to claim 1 , comprising tracking eligibility of the consumer for the deal.
8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method is performed in a multi-channel retail environment.
9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the method is performed in a gamified environment.
10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the predicate logic tree is operable to provide an output that is associated with an array that comprises members that comprise one or more of a particular rule, a particular consumer record, and a number of times that the particular rule has been met by the particular consumer record.
11. The method according to claim 1 , comprising:
resolving one or more variables of the set of requirements; and
repeating the steps of evaluating and resolving until all variables are resolved.
12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of rules relates to whether a first item is being purchased by the consumer.
13. The method according to claim 12 , wherein the plurality of rules relates to whether a second item is being purchased by the consumer.
14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the plurality of rules relates to whether the second item was previously purchased by the consumer within a particular time period.
15. The method according to claim 12 , wherein the plurality of rules relates to whether the first item was previously purchased by consumer within a particular time period.
16. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the selected plurality of consumer records for the consumer making the purchase is selected as a subset of all the consumer records for the consumer.
17. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a relationship between two or more rules determines a number of times that the consumer is entitled to receive the deal.
18. The method according to claim 1 , comprising performing a third instance of the rule evaluation for each of a plurality of rules nested within the second instance of the rule evaluation.
19. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the plurality of rules comprises a rule that provides for sorting of a portion of the plurality of consumer records.
20. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the set of requirements comprises one or more simple conditions and one or more aggregations, wherein the one or more aggregations comprise one or more functions.