IP Library Granted Patent US 12,103,674
Granted Patent B2
US 12,103,674 · App. 18/122,502 · Granted Oct 1, 2024

Short takeoff and landing vehicle with forward swept wings

Inventors: Pranay Sinha (Sunnyvale, CA); Damon Vander Lind (Alameda, CA)
Assignee: Kitty Hawk Corporation
B64C29/0033B60L50/64B60L53/00B64C13/48B64C27/82B64C39/12B64D27/02B64D27/24B64D27/40B64D31/06G05D1/101B60L2200/10B64C2027/8209B64D27/026B64D27/402
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,103,674
App. No.
18/122,502
Granted
Oct 1, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A vehicle includes a tilt rotor that is aft of a fixed wing and that is attached to the fixed wing via a pylon. A flight computer configured to instruct the tilt rotor to produce a maximum downward angle including by updating an actuator authority database associated with the flight computer to reflect the maximum downward angle, and generating a rotor control signal for the tilt rotor using the updated actuator authority database that reflects the maximum downward angle, wherein the maximum downward angle is adjustable.

Claims (28)

1. A vehicle, comprising:

a tilt rotor that is aft of a fixed wing and that is attached to the fixed wing via a pylon; and

a flight computer configured to instruct the tilt rotor to produce a maximum downward angle including by:

updating an actuator authority database associated with the flight computer to reflect the maximum downward angle; and

generating a rotor control signal for the tilt rotor using the updated actuator authority database that reflects the maximum downward angle, wherein the maximum downward angle is adjustable.

2. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the fixed wing includes a forward-swept and tapered wing.

3. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the tilt rotor includes a plurality of hard stops corresponding to different maximum downward angles.

4. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the tilt rotor is capable of rotating between a cruise position and the maximum downward angle.

5. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the maximum downward angle is determined based at least in part on a length of a runway.

6. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the maximum downward angle is determined based at least in part on a desired range for the vehicle.

7. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein the flight computer is configured to update a set of permitted flight modes associated with the flight computer to reflect the maximum downward angle.

8. The vehicle recited in claim 1 , wherein:

the maximum downward angle is at 90°; and

the flight computer is configured to update a set of permitted flight modes associated with the flight computer to include a hover flight mode.

9. A method, comprising:

providing a tilt rotor that is aft of a fixed wing and that is attached to the fixed wing via a pylon; and

providing a flight computer, wherein the flight computer is configured to instruct the tilt rotor to produce a maximum downward angle including by:

updating an actuator authority database associated with the flight computer to reflect the maximum downward angle; and

generating a rotor control signal for the tilt rotor using the updated actuator authority database that reflects the maximum downward angle, wherein the maximum downward angle is adjustable.

10. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the fixed wing includes a forward-swept and tapered wing.

11. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the tilt rotor includes a plurality of hard stops corresponding to different maximum downward angles.

12. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the tilt rotor is capable of rotating between a cruise position and the maximum downward angle.

13. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the maximum downward angle is determined based at least in part on a length of a runway.

14. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the maximum downward angle is determined based at least in part on a desired range for a vehicle in which the tilt rotor is provided.

15. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the flight computer is configured to update a set of permitted flight modes associated with the flight computer to reflect the maximum downward angle.

16. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein:

the maximum downward angle is at 90°; and

the flight computer is configured to update a set of permitted flight modes associated with the flight computer to include a hover flight mode.

Continuity (4)
Continuation 17345493 · Jun 11, 2021
Continuation 17066058 · Oct 8, 2020
Provisional Application 62912872 · Oct 9, 2019
Related Publication 20230234704A1 · Jul 27, 2023