IP Library Granted Patent US 12,535,464
Granted Patent B2
US 12,535,464 · App. 18/134,350 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

System and method for real-time visualization of defects in a material

Inventors: David A. Jack (Waco, TX); Benjamin M. Blandford (Waco, TX); Nathaniel J. Blackman (Hewitt, TX)
Assignee: Baylor University
G01N29/0645G01B17/02G01J5/48G01N29/28G01N29/44G01N2291/0231G01N2291/0289G01N2291/106
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,535,464
App. No.
18/134,350
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides a system and method for real-time visualization of a material during ultrasonic non-destructive testing. The system includes a graphical user interface (GUI) capable of showing a three-dimensional (3-D) image of a composite laminate constructed of a series of two-dimensional (2-D) cross sections. The GUI is capable of displaying the 3-D image as each additional 2-D cross section is scanned by an ultrasonic testing apparatus in real time or near real time, including probable defect regions that contain a flaw such as a hole, crack, wrinkle, or foreign object within the composite. Furthermore, in one embodiment, the system includes an artificial intelligence capable of highlighting defect areas within the 3-D image in real time or near real time and providing data regarding each defect area, such as the depth, size, and/or type of each defect.

Claims (31)

1 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

an ultrasonic transducer in communication with a processor and a display means;

wherein the ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object including to a damage region;

wherein the processor generates a plurality of A-scans of the test object;

wherein a plurality of gate regions is selected, each representing a different range of depths within the test object;

wherein the processor generates a C-scan for each of the plurality of gate regions of the test object;

wherein the processor generates an area of the damage region for each of the plurality of C-scans of the test object;

wherein the ultrasonic transducer is a spherically focused transducer and is disposed within a coupling fluid-filled chamber of a portable transducer housing assembly; and

wherein the C-scan for each of the plurality of gate regions of the test object is generated by calculating a maximum of an absolute value for the gate region of each of the plurality of A-scans.

2 . The system of claim 1 , further including a thermographic scanning device, wherein the thermographic scanning device performs an initial scan of the test object to find a potential damage area, and wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates on the potential damage area.

3 . The system of claim 1 , further including a phased array ultrasonic scanning device, wherein the phased array ultrasonic scanning device performs an initial scan of the test object to find a potential damage area, and wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates on the potential damage area.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the ultrasonic transducer operates at a frequency between 5 and 15 MHz.

5 . The system of claim 1 , further including a band pass filter, wherein the band pass filter has cutoff frequencies of 5 MHz and 15 MHz.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein, based on the damage region for each of the plurality of C-scans of the test object, the processor generates a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model of at least one portion of the test object, indicating an internal stress state in the test object.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor generates a 3-D graphical representation of the damage region.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one dye applicator applies dye to the damage region prior to the ultrasonic transducer emitting ultrasonic waves to scan the damage region.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor automatically generates an estimated impact energy of debris that caused the damage region based on the calculated area of the damage region.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the test object includes a plurality of layers, wherein the processor generates an average B-scan for the test object, wherein the average B-scan is used to determine an average thickness of each of the plurality of layers, and wherein the plurality of gate regions is selected based on the average thickness of each of the plurality of layers.

11 . A system for non-destructive testing of composite materials, comprising:

an ultrasonic transducer in communication with a processor and a display means;

a phased array ultrasonic scanning device;

wherein the ultrasonic transducer is operable to emit ultrasonic waves into and receive ultrasonic waves from a test object;

wherein the processor generates a plurality of A-scans of potential damage area test object;

wherein a plurality of gate regions is selected, each representing a different range of depths within the test object;

wherein the processor generates a C-scan for each of the plurality of gate regions of the test object;

wherein the processor determines a damage region for each of the plurality of C-scans of the test object;

wherein the processor generates an area of the damage region for each of the plurality of C-scans of the test object;

wherein the C-scan for each of the plurality of gate regions of the test object is generated by calculating a maximum of an absolute value for the gate region of each of the plurality of A-scans; and

wherein the processor automatically generates an estimated impact energy of debris that caused the damage region based on the calculated area of the damage region.

12 . The system of claim 11 , further including a thermographic scanning device, wherein the thermographic scanning device performs an initial scan of the test object to find an initial inspection area.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein, based on the damage region for each of the plurality of C-scans of the test object, the processor generates a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) model of at least one portion of the test object, indicating an internal stress state in the test object.

Assignments (3)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Mar 12, 2026
From: VERIFI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 074060/0593 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2023
From: JACK, DAVID A.; BLANDFORD, BENJAMIN M.; BLACKMAN, NATHANIEL J.
To: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 063321/0625 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2023
From: BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
To: VERIFI TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 063321/0634 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation In Part 17123970 · Dec 16, 2020
Continuation In Part 17122410 · Dec 15, 2020
Continuation In Part 17108472 · Dec 1, 2020
Continuation In Part 17091774 · Nov 6, 2020
Provisional Application 63001608 · Mar 30, 2020
Related Publication 20230251228A1 · Aug 10, 2023
References Cited (69)
US 3239801A · Mcgaughey · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 4184373A · Evans et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4215583A · Botsco et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 5009104A · Johnson · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5088327A · Gammell · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5408882A · McKinley et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5494038A · Wang et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5631425A · Wang et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6490501B1 · Saunders · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6945111B2 · Georgeson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6959602B2 · Peterson, Jr. et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7010980B2 · Meier · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7017422B2 · Heyman et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7574915B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7895895B2 · Kollgaard et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7975549B2 · Fetzer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8234924B2 · Saxena et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8265886B2 · Bisiaux et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8347723B2 · Questo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8522615B1 · Brady et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9121817B1 · Roach et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9207639B2 · Ratering · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9297789B2 · Djordjevic et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9360418B2 · Georgeson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9494562B2 · Lin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10161910B2 · Niri et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10302600B2 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10345272B2 · Holmes et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10444195B2 · Bingham · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10605781B2 · Grewal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10697941B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10761067B2 · Jack et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030089171A1 · Kenefick et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040020296A1 · Moles et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040031337A1 · Masaniello · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060225508A1 · Sfeir · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070175282A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070258858A1 · Rasnow et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080000299A1 · Georgeson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100251822A1 · Sobe et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110274369A1 · Smith et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120250970A1 · Tsubaki et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130031979A1 · Bergman · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130228015A1 · Wimplinger · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140216158A1 · Martin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150377839A1 · Jack · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160320344A1 · Spencer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170284971A1 · Hall · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170299381A1 · Bingham · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180101944A1 · Sakai et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180120268A1 · Georgeson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180231502A1 · Kahmann et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190004013A1 · Choi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190187107A1 · Asadollahi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190257799A1 · Palmer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190293610A1 · Campbell et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200047425A1 · Jahanbin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200072796A1 · Fiseni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200173964A1 · Hudson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200230899A1 · Tyson · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200232951A1 · Fetzer et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210078177A1 · Troy · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210128102A1 · Negishi · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302376A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210302385A1 · Jack et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210372969A1 · Giurgiutiu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
Beatriz Larrañaga-Valsero, Robert A. Smith, Rostand B. Tayong, Antonio Fernández-López, Alfredo Güemes, Wrinkle measurement in glass-carbon hybrid laminates comparing ultrasonic techniques: A case study, Aug. 15, 2018, … [cited by applicant]
Full 3D characterisation of composite laminates using ultrasonic analytic signals by Smith et al. (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Nelson Luke, Smith Robert, Fibre Direction and Stacking Sequence Measurement in Carbon Fibre Composites using Radon Transforms of Ultrasonic Data, Mar. 2019, Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 11… [cited by applicant]