IP Library Granted Patent US 12,530,918
Granted Patent B2
US 12,530,918 · App. 18/148,544 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Document assembly object generation and use in document image verification

Inventors: Stuart Wells (Saratoga, CA); Attila Balogh (Vienna, AT); Anshuman Vikram Singh (Vienna, AT); Thomas Krump (Buchkirken, AT)
Assignee: Jumio Corporation
G06V30/413G06F16/53G06F16/55G06V30/414
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,530,918
App. No.
18/148,544
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure includes a system and method for obtaining a query including a document assembly object identifier, the query associated with a request to verify a document under test present in an image; obtaining a document assembly object describing a valid document uniquely associated with the identifier, the document assembly object including: a set of document components, a set of derived document features, and a set of verification checks including one or more of a direct check and a derived check; obtaining aggregated context information associated with the document under test; and sending the document assembly object and aggregated context information for use in verification of the document under test.

Claims (40)

1 . A method comprising:

deriving, using one or more processors, a set of derived document features based on a set of valid document instances;

determining, using the one or more processors, a set of verification checks based on one or more of information published by a document issuer, and the set of derived document features;

generating, using the one or more processors, a document assembly object describing a valid document and uniquely associated with a document assembly object identifier, the document assembly object including:

a set of document components,

the set of derived document features, and

the set of verification checks including one or more of a direct check and a derived check;

obtaining, using the one or more processors, a query associated with a request to verify a document under test present in an image, the query including the document assembly object identifier associated with the document assembly object;

obtaining, using the one or more processors, aggregated context information associated with the document under test; and

outputting, using the one or more processors, a decision whether the document under test is valid based on the set of verification checks and the aggregated context information.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the unique document assembly object identifier is a concatenation of one or more of a main document type, a sub-type, a country, a state, a year of first issuing, and a version associated with the document under test.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the unique document assembly object identifier is received from a document classifier, and the unique document assembly object identifier is based on a classification of the document under test.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the document components include one or more of mandatory fields, optional fields, example images, security features, and document layout.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the document assembly object includes a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) object and at least one link to a valid sample snippet.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the derived document features include a reconstruction of a background or microprinting.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of verification checks includes at least one direct verification check extracted from document issuer provided information, the document issuer issuing valid instances of the document under test.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of verification checks includes at least one derived verification check based on one or more of the derived document features.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of derived document features includes a bounding box template, wherein each bounding box in the bounding box template is associated with text or an object present in a valid instance of the document and an expected location of the text or the object within the valid instance of the document.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the aggregated context information includes a set of intermediary results associated with historic document evaluations.

11 . A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the system to:

derive, a set of derived document features based on a set of valid document instances;

determine, using a machine learning model, a set of verification checks based on one or more of information published by a document issuer, and the set of derived document features;

generate a document assembly object describing a valid document and uniquely associated with a document assembly object identifier, the document assembly object including:

a set of document components,

the set of derived document features, and

the set of verification checks including one or more of a direct check and a derived check;

obtain, a query associated with a request to verify a document under test present in an image, the query including the document assembly object identifier associated with the document assembly object;

obtain aggregated context information associated with the document under test; and

output a decision whether the document under test is valid based on the set of verification checks and the aggregated context information.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the unique document assembly object identifier is a concatenation of one or more of a main document type, a sub-type, a country, a state, a year of first issuing, and a version associated with the document under test.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the unique document assembly object identifier is received from a document classifier, and the unique document assembly object identifier is based on a classification of the document under test.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the document components include one or more of mandatory fields, optional fields, example images, security features, and document layout.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the document assembly object includes a JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) object and at least one link to a valid sample snippet.

16 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the derived document features include a reconstruction of a background or microprinting.

17 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of verification checks includes at least one direct verification check extracted from document issuer provided information, the document issuer issuing valid instances of the document under test.

18 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of verification checks includes at least one derived verification check based on one or more of the derived document features.

19 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the set of derived document features includes a bounding box template, wherein each bounding box in the bounding box template is associated with text or an object present in a valid instance of the document and an expected location of the text or the object within the valid instance of the document.

20 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the aggregated context information includes a set of intermediary results associated with historic document evaluations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2023
From: WELLS, STUART; BALOGH, ATTILA; SINGH, ANSHUMAN VIKRAM; KRUMP, THOMAS
To: JUMIO CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062685/0924 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240221411A1 · Jul 4, 2024
References Cited (142)
US 4897814A · Clark · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5544255A · Smithies et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5668897A · Stolfo · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5748780A · Stolfo · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5838814A · Moore · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6363162B1 · Moed et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7040539B1 · Stover · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7831531B1 · Baluja et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8326761B1 · Hecht et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8352494B1 · Badoiu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8886648B1 · Procopio et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8910032B2 · Graves et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9135517B1 · Adams · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10320807B2 · Khan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11144752B1 · Castelblanco et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11416562B1 · Gruhl et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11593439B1 · Avadhani et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11715102B2 · Edwards et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11900755B1 · Bueche, Jr. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020064305A1 · Taylor · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030172066A1 · Cooper et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030229637A1 · Baxter et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040155877A1 · Hong et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060041506A1 · Mason et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060124726A1 · Kotovich et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060164682A1 · Lev · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070078846A1 · Gulli et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070086628A1 · Fuchs et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070116328A1 · Sablak · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080065630A1 · Luo et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080149713A1 · Brundage · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090060396A1 · Blessan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090152357A1 · Lei et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090261158A1 · Lawson · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100027896A1 · Geva et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110057040A1 · Jones · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110128360A1 · Hatzav et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20140002872A1 · Cook · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100590A1 · Robinson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150242592A1 · Weiss et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150341370A1 · Khan · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160005050A1 · Teman · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160098399A1 · Casperson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160210450A1 · Su · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170161375A1 · Stoica et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170193285A1 · Negi · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170277945A1 · Budihal et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170322932A1 · Deschenes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170337449A1 · Hamada et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180060874A1 · Kelts et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075090A1 · Knight et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180186164A1 · Wu · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180204113A1 · Galron et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180293461A1 · Le et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300296A1 · Ziraknejad et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373859A1 · Ganong · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190035431A1 · Attorre · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190205686A1 · Mayer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190272549A1 · Mossoba et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190278986A1 · Nepomniachtchi · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200184201A1 · Kaehler · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200304650A1 · Roach · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200342600A1 · Sjostrand et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200366671A1 · Larson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124919A1 · Balakrishnan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259660A1 · Bharat et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210307841A1 · Buch et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210320801A1 · Wyss · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210326629A1 · Slattery · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220028086A1 · Woodard et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058660A1 · Ivanov · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220180113A1 · Patel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220182430A1 · Bennett-James et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220385880A1 · Nims · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230013380A1 · Choi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230017185A1 · Cheong et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230113148A1 · Zlotnick · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230129350A1 · Bryan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230143239A1 · Yusuf et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230196628A1 · Bischoff et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230298031A1 · Drapeau et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230421602A1 · Boyer et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240046686A1 · Ye et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250225527A1 · Jiang et al. · 2025 [cited by applicant]
MY 192715A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“7 Best Face Morph Apps 2024 (Morph Two Faces Together).” ContentMaverickscom, Content Mavericks, 2024, contentmavericks.com/best-face-morph-app/. 2024 Web. 25 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
“Levenshtein Distance.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Dec. 23, 2023, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance. Web. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
“New Method Detects Deepfake Videos with up to 99% Accuracy.” News, May 3, 2022, news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/05/03/new-method-detects-deepfake-videos-99-accuracy. Web. 3 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “Context-Sensitive Spelling Correction Using Google Web 1T 5-Gram Information.” Computer and Information Science (Toronto), vol. 5, No. 3, 2012, p. 37. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Bassil, Youssef, and Mohammad Alwani. “OCR Post-Processing Error Correction Algorithm Using Google Online Spelling Suggestion.” ArXiv.org, 2012, pp. arXiv.org, 2012. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Benalcazar, Daniel, et al. “Synthetic ID Card Image Generation for Improving Presentation Attack Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, 2023, pp. 1814-1824. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Casado, Constantino Alvarez, et al. “Real-time Face Alignment: Evaluation Methods, Training Strategies and Implementation Optimization.” Journal of Real-time Image Processing 18.6 (2021): 2239-2267. Web. 2021. [cited by applicant]
deepswap.ai, “Deepswap—Best Face and Video Edit Tools Online.” DeepSwap AI, www.deepswap.ai/?utm_source=bing&cp_id=441169896&msclkid=eb76125c4d531cf9797e77325a694067. Accessed Dec. 2023. Web. 11 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
DEVCODEF1 Editors, Using LLMS for OCR text proofreading: A guide for software developers. Dev Code F1. May 26, 2023, <https://devcodef1.com/news/1007434/llms-for-ocr-text-proofreading> Web. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Faceshape. “Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together.” Face Morphing Simulator—Morph Two Faces Together, www.faceshape.com/face-morph. (2022) Web. 2 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Fadilpašić, Sead. “Deepfake Fraud Attacks Are Hitting More and More Businesses.” TechRadar, TechRadar Pro, Feb. 24, 2023, www.techradar.com/news/deepfake-fraud-attacks-are-hitting-more-and-more-businesses. Accessed Jan.… [cited by applicant]
GitHub, Use Llama2 to Improve the Accuracy of Tesseract OCR. GitHub. (n.d.). https://github.com/Dicklesworthstone/llama2_aided_tesseract> Web. Last updated Aug. 2, 2023. 3 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Help Net Security. “Detecting Face Morphing: A Simple Guide to Countering Complex Identity Fraud.” Help Net Security, Mar. 16, 2023, www.helpnetsecurity.com/2023/03/20/facial-morphing-technology/. Web. 5 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Hu, Yifei, et al. “Misspelling Correction with Pre-Trained Contextual Language Model.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Kaspersky, Secure Futures Editors. “What Does the Rise of Deepfakes Means for the Future of Cybersecurity?” Daily English USA Usakasperskycomblog, Kaspersky Secure Futures Editors, usa.kaspersky.com/blog/secure-futures-… [cited by applicant]
Kramer, Robin S. S., et al. “Face Morphing Attacks: Investigating Detection with Humans and Computers.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, vol. 4, No. 1, 2019, p. 28. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Kumar, Varun. “14 Best Deepfake Apps and Tools in 2024.” RankRed, Jan. 1, 2024, www.rankred.com/best-deepfake-apps-tools/. Web. 22 pgs. 2024. [cited by applicant]
Lee, Jung-Hun, et al. “Deep Learning-Based Context-Sensitive Spelling Typing Error Correction.” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020, pp. 152565-152578. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Zhaoxiang, et al. “Facial Pose Estimation by Deep Learning from Label Distributions.” (2019). Web. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW), 9 pgs. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lowphansirkul, Lalita, et al. “WangchanBERTa: Pretraining Transformer-Based Thai Language Models.” ArXiv.org, 2021, pp. arXiv.org, 2021. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Luo, Yinhui et al. “A Review of Homography Estimation: Advances and Challenges.” Electronics 2023 pp. 4977-4977. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/12/24/4977 2023. [cited by applicant]
Lyu, Siwei, “Detecting ‘deepfake’ Videos in the Blink of an Eye.” The Conversation, Sep. 15, 2022, theconversation.com/detecting-deepfake-videos-in-the-blink-of-an-eye-101072. Web. 4 pgs. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Mazaheri, Ghazal et al. “2022 Ieee/Cvf Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (Wacv).” Detection and Localization of Facial Expression Manipulations IEEE 2022 pp. 2773-2783 2022. [cited by applicant]
Nightingale, Sophie J., et al. “Perceptual and Computational Detection of Face Morphing.” Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), vol. 21, No. 3, 2021, p. 4. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Picsi.AI, “Create Realistic Face Morphs” Picsi.AI, InsightFace, 2023, www.picsi.ai/. Web. 8 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, A. (Nov. 16, 2021). OCR passports with opencv and Tesseract. PylmageSearch. <https://pyimagesearch.com/2021/12/01/ocr-passports-with-opencv-and-tesseract/> Web. 24 pgs. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Sadeghzadeh, Arezoo, et al., “Pose-invariant face recognition based on matching the occlusion free regions aligned by 3D generic model.” IET Computer Vision, Aug. 2020, vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 177-287. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schulz, Daniel, et al., “Identify Documents Image Quality Assessment.” European Association for Signal Processing, Proceedings 2022 pp. 1017-1021. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Seibold, C., et al., “Detection of Face Morphing Attacks by Deep Learning.” Digital Forensics and Watermarking. IWDW (2017). Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol. 10431. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3… [cited by applicant]
Tesseract-OCR, Improving the Quality of the Output Github.com, Tesseract User Manual v. 5.x, 9 pgs, updated Dec. 5, 2023. Web. 2023. [cited by applicant]
Times, Global. “Tencent Launches Large Language Model ‘Hunyuan’ amid Global Generative Ai Frenzy.” Global Times, Sep. 7, 2023, www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1297761.shtml. 6 pgs. 2023. [cited by applicant]
YouTube, YouTube, “Morphing Identity: A real-time face morphing system to transforming face identity.” May 15, 2021, Cybernetic Humanity Studio. https://youtu.be/ahKxwaJ3k_U?si=kp4G4wFa8IAsGNLY 2021. [cited by applicant]
Zhao, Jian et al. “2018 Ieee/Cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.” Towards Pose Invariant Face Recognition in the Wild IEEE 2018 pp. 2207-2216. 2018. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79511 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 13, 2023, date of mailing Mar. 4, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/86219 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 28, 2023, date of mailing May 23, 2024, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Di Guardo, Fabrizio. “Facemask—a Real-Time Face Morphing Tool.” Medium, Level Up Coding, May 2, 2023, levelup.gitconnected.com/facemask-a-real-time-face-morphing-tool-5b343591a237. May 2, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Face Landmark Detection Guide | Google Ai Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/face_landmarker. [cited by applicant]
“Image Segmentation Guide | Google Ai Edge | Google AI for Developers.” Google, ai.google.dev/edge/mediapipe/solutions/vision/image_segmenter. [cited by applicant]
Kirillov, Alexander et al. “Segment Anything.” 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Oct. 1, 2023, doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.00371. Oct. 1, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Large Language and Vision Assistant.” LLaVA, llava-vl.github.io/. [cited by applicant]
Liu, Haotian, et al. “Visual Instruction Tuning.” 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 11, 2023, arxiv.org/pdf/2304.08485. Dec. 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
“Llava 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian.” LLaVA 1.6—a Hugging Face Space by Liuhaotian, huggingface.co/spaces/liuhaotian/LLaVA-1.6. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Xin, et al. “Attribute-Aware Implicit Modality Alignment for Text Attribute Person Search.” Arxiv.Org, Jun. 6, 2024. Jun. 6, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Zhe, et al. “Attribute-guided Transformer for Robust Person Re-identification.” IET Computer Vision, vol. 17, No. 8, Jun. 23, 2023, pp. 977-992, doi:10.1049/cvi2.12215. Jun. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US23/79821 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Nov. 15, 2023, date of mailing Apr. 4, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Erhu, et al. “Forgery Detection for Perforated No. in Security Document by Analysing the Perforated Holes.” The Imaging Science Journal 65.1 (2017): 40-48. Web. [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Analysis and Evaluation of Braille to Text Conversion Methods.” Mobile Information Systems, vol. 2020, 2020, pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Shokat, Sana, et al. “Characterization of English Braille Patterns Using Automated Tools and RICA Based Feature Extraction Methods.” Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 22, No. 5, 2022, p. 1836. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2024/048525 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Sep. 26, 2024, date of mailing Nov. 27, 2024, 10 pages. 2024. [cited by applicant]
Aslam, Asra, et al., May 15, 2019, Depth-Map Generation using Pixel Matching in Stereoscopic Pair of Images, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.03471.pdf, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Elsayed, M et al. “A New Method for Full Reference Image Blur Measure.” International Journal of Simulation: Systems Science and Technology V19 N1 (Feb. 1, 2018): 7.1-7.5 2018 https://doi.org/10.5013/IJSSST.a.19.01.7. [cited by applicant]
Canada Passport Phot Security Features, Canada.ca, Government of Canada (Dec. 20, 2022) https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/canadian-passports/photos.html#photo, webpage 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Edge Detection Using OpenCV, LearnOpenCV.com, (2023) https://learnopencv.com/edge-detection-using-opencv/, webpage. 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Passport Phot Specifications., Government of Canada (2015) https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/ircc/migration/ircc/english/pdf/pub/pass-photo-spec-eng.pdf, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, “OpenCV Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for blur detection in images and video streams.” PyImageSearch.com, Jun. 15, 2020, webpage, 21 pgs. https://pyimagesearch.com/2020/06/15/opencv-fast-fourier-transf… [cited by applicant]
Rosebrock, Adrian, Blur Detection with OpenCV PyImageSearch.com, Sep. 7, 2015, https://pyimagesearch.com/2015/09/07/blur-detection-with-opencv/, webpage, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US24/62269 Jumio Corporation, International filing date of Dec. 30, 2024, date of mailing Mar. 7, 2025, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]