IP Library Granted Patent US 12,072,110
Granted Patent B2
US 12,072,110 · App. 18/151,593 · Granted Aug 27, 2024

Systems and methods for checking status of a pressure transducer

Inventors: John F. Broker (Warrenton, MO); Lily Wan (St. Louis, MO); Bradley C. Zikes (St. Louis, MO)
Assignee: Copeland Comfort Control LP
F24F11/38F24F11/49G05B15/02G05B19/048F23N2225/04F24D19/1084F24D2220/046G05B2219/24015G05B2219/2614G05B2219/2642
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,072,110
App. No.
18/151,593
Granted
Aug 27, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of controlling a gas furnace system includes controlling a motor of a draft inducer to increase a speed of the motor in response to a call for heat, receiving pressure signals output by a pressure transducer, receiving signals indicating whether a pressure switch is in a first state or a second state, and determining a first status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a first time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a first status of the motor of the draft inducer at the first time. Operation of the motor of the draft inducer is stopped when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

Claims (56)

1. A gas furnace system comprising:

a draft inducer including a motor, the draft inducer in fluid communication with a conduit;

a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within the conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure;

a pressure switch positioned to sense the pressure within the conduit, the pressure switch having a first state and a second state, and configured to be in the first state when the sensed pressure is below a predetermined pressure and to switch to the second state when the sensed pressure reaches or exceeds the predetermined pressure; and

a controller connected to the draft inducer, the pressure transducer, and the pressure switch, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

control the motor of the draft inducer in response to a call for heat;

receive pressure signals output by the pressure transducer;

receive signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state;

determine a first status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a first time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a first status of the motor of the draft inducer at the first time, wherein a determination that the first status is questionable indicates the pressure transducer is less reliable than if the first status was reliable and the pressure transducer is more reliable than if the first status was unreliable;

continue operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is reliable;

output an alert or warning and continue operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is questionable; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

2. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is programmed to

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a second time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a second status of the motor of the draft inducer at the second time; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the second status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

3. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the processor is programmed to continue operating the motor of the draft inducer in response to the call for heat when the first status of the pressure transducer and the second status of the pressure transducer indicate that the pressure transducer is reliable or questionable.

4. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the first time is when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state.

5. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the first time is when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state, and the second time is when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state.

6. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the first status of the motor comprises a speed of the motor increasing.

7. The gas furnace system of claim 2 , wherein the first status of the motor comprises a speed of the motor increasing, and the second status of the motor comprises the speed of the motor decreasing.

8. A controller for a gas furnace system including a draft inducer having a motor, a pressure transducer positioned to sense a pressure within a conduit and output signals proportional to the sensed pressure, and a pressure switch positioned to sense the pressure within the conduit, the pressure switch having a first state and a second state, and configured to be in the first state when the sensed pressure is below a predetermined pressure and to switch to the second state when the sensed pressure reaches or exceeds the predetermined pressure, the controller comprising a processor programmed to:

receive pressure signals output by the pressure transducer;

receive signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state;

control the motor of the draft inducer in response to a call for heat;

determine a first status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a first time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a first status of the motor of the draft inducer at the first time, wherein a determination that the first status is questionable indicates the pressure transducer is less reliable than if the first status was reliable and the pressure transducer is more reliable than if the first status was unreliable;

continue operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is reliable;

output an alert or warning and continue operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is questionable; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

9. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the processor is programmed to:

determine a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a second time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a second status of the motor of the draft inducer at the second time; and

stop operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the second status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

10. The controller of claim 9 , wherein the processor is programmed to continue operating the motor of the draft inducer in response to the call for heat when the first status of the pressure transducer and the second status of the pressure transducer indicate that the pressure transducer is reliable or questionable.

11. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the first time is when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state.

12. The controller of claim 9 , wherein the first time is when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state, and the second time is when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state.

13. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the first status of the motor comprises a speed of the motor increasing.

14. The controller of claim 9 , wherein the first status of the motor comprises a speed of the motor increasing, and the second status of the motor comprises the speed of the motor decreasing.

15. A method of controlling a gas furnace system comprising:

controlling a motor of a draft inducer coupled to a conduit to increase a speed of the motor from a stopped condition in response to a call for heat;

receiving pressure signals output by a pressure transducer responsive to pressure in the conduit;

receiving signals indicating whether a pressure switch responsive to pressure in the conduit is in a first state or a second state;

determining a first status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a first time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a first status of the motor of the draft inducer at the first time, wherein a determination that the first status is questionable indicates the pressure transducer is less reliable than if the first status was reliable and the pressure transducer is more reliable than if the first status was unreliable;

continuing operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is reliable;

outputting an alert or warning and continuing operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is questionable; and

stopping operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the first status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:

determining a second status of the pressure transducer as reliable, unreliable, or questionable at a second time based on the received pressure signals from the pressure transducer, the signals indicating whether the pressure switch is in the first state or the second state, and a second status of the motor of the draft inducer at the second time; and

stopping operation of the motor of the draft inducer when the second status of the pressure transducer indicates that the pressure transducer is unreliable.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising continuing operating the motor of the draft inducer in response to the call for heat when the first status of the pressure transducer and the second status of the pressure transducer indicate that the pressure transducer is reliable or questionable.

18. The method of claim 15 , further comprising detecting a time when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state as the first time.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

detecting a time when the pressure switch switches from the first state to the second state as the first time; and

detecting a time when the pressure switch switches from the second state to the first state as the second time.

20. The controller of claim 16 , wherein the first status of the motor comprises a speed of the motor increasing, and the second status of the motor comprises the speed of the motor decreasing.

21. The gas furnace system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is programmed to transmit the alert or warning to a mobile device.

22. The controller of claim 8 , wherein the processor is programmed to transmit the alert or warning to a mobile device.

23. The method of claim 15 , wherein outputting the alert or warning comprises transmitting the alert or warning to a mobile device.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2024
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068255/0466 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064278/0165 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064280/0333 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064286/0001 →
SUPPLEMENTAL IP ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded May 30, 2023
From: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
To: COPELAND COMFORT CONTROL LP
Reel/Frame 063804/0611 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2023
From: BROKER, JOHN F.; WAN, LILY; ZIKES, BRADLEY C.
To: EMERSON ELECTRIC CO.
Reel/Frame 062311/0119 →