IP Library Granted Patent US 12,397,774
Granted Patent B2
US 12,397,774 · App. 18/152,266 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Intelligent engine activation planner

Inventors: Kyle Hollins Wray (Fremont, CA); Liam Pedersen (San Francisco, CA); Richard Lui (Sunnyvale, CA); Christopher Ostafew (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Nissan North America, Inc.
B60W20/13B60W10/06G01C21/3469B60W10/08B60W2510/242
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,397,774
App. No.
18/152,266
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for planning an activation action for an engine of a vehicle is disclosed. The method includes planning, according to a model, an activation action of an engine of a vehicle, and activating the engine according to the activation action. The model includes a state space comprising a current charge level of the battery and whether the engine is currently on or off. The activation action is selected from a set comprising a first action to turn on the engine to charge the battery and a second action to turn off the engine.

Claims (46)

1. A method, comprising:

planning, according to a model, an activation action of an engine of a vehicle,

wherein the model includes a state space comprising a current charge level of a battery, a navigation map, and whether the engine is currently on or off, and

wherein the activation action is selected from a set comprising a first action to turn on the engine to charge the battery and a second action to turn off the engine;

utilizing learned historic driving patterns included in the navigation map in determining whether to select the first action or the second action; and

activating the engine according to the activation action.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein planning, according to the model, the activation action of the engine comprises:

selecting the second action when the vehicle enters an area where noise is undesirable.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the model follows hard-coded rules.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the navigation map includes a current road segment of the vehicle.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein planning, according to the model, the activation action of the engine comprises:

planning the activation action based on an objective, wherein the objective is to minimize energy consumption of the vehicle.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein planning, according to the model, the activation action of the engine comprises:

planning the activation action based on an objective, wherein the objective is to minimize a number of times that the engine is toggled.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the state space further comprises whether a power-consuming component of the vehicle is on or off.

8. The method of claim 4 , wherein the model employs a cost function including one or more costs, wherein the one or more costs are associated with the activation action of the engine, wherein the costs comprise at least one of:

an expected energy expenditure cost;

an expected wasted energy cost;

an expected cost of the engine switching; or

an extra noise generated if the engine is activated.

9. The method of claim 4 , wherein the model includes a transition function that uses a traffic information from the navigation map.

10. The method of claim 4 , wherein the model includes a transition function comprising at least one of a movement in edges of the navigation map, a battery change function, and a change in engine status based on the navigation map and a performed activation action.

11. A device for charging a battery of a vehicle by an engine comprising:

a memory; and

a processor, the processor configured to:

obtain an activation action from an action space, wherein the action space comprises a first activation action of turning the engine on and a second activation action of turning the engine off, and wherein obtaining the activation action from the action space comprises using a navigation map storing learned driving patterns specific to the vehicle; and

activate the engine according to the activation action, wherein activating the engine using the first activation action causes the engine to turn on to charge the battery of the vehicle.

12. The device of claim 11 , wherein the second activation action is obtained as the activation action when the vehicle enters an area where noise is undesirable.

13. The device of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the activation action from the action space comprises using a cost function including one or more costs, wherein the one or more costs are associated with the activation action, wherein the costs comprise at least one of:

an expected energy expenditure cost;

an expected wasted energy cost;

an expected cost of the engine switching; or

an extra noise generated if the engine is activated;

second component indicating a predefined engine activation based on a range of a state of charge of the battery.

14. The device of claim 11 , wherein obtaining the activation action from the action space comprises using a state transition function including a first component indicating how a location of the vehicle changes stochastically following a topological graph of edges formed by various road segments connecting start nodes to end nodes of the navigation map.

15. A vehicle comprising:

a battery;

an engine; and

a processor configured to:

determine, based on one or more objectives, an activation action of the engine of the vehicle,

wherein the activation action is selected from a set comprising a first activation action of turning the engine on and a second activation action of turning the engine off,

wherein the battery of the vehicle is charged by the engine when the engine is turned on,

wherein the activation action comprises taking a scalarization function of at least the one or more objectives and a battery level; and

activate the engine according to the determination of the activation action.

16. The vehicle of claim 15 , wherein the one or more objectives are based on at least one of an energy expenditure of the engine, a wasted energy, and an extra noise generated by the engine.

17. The vehicle of claim 15 , wherein the one or more objectives comprise minimizing, over time, a total energy consumption of the engine.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2026
From: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
To: NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 074681/0544 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 10, 2023
From: WRAY, KYLE HOLLINS; PEDERSEN, LIAM; LUI, RICHARD; OSTAFEW, CHRISTOPHER
To: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 062325/0492 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17130315 · Dec 22, 2020
Related Publication 20230174042A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (52)
US 5081365A · Field et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 6314347B1 · Kuroda et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 8972090B2 · Weslati et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9067589B1 · Zhao et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9878631B2 · Hyde · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10086822B2 · Arnaiz · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10118604B1 · Wrobel · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 11608048B2 · Wray et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11614335B2 · Wray et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11946760B2 · Wray et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020188387A1 · Woestman et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050038572A1 · Krupowicz · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060173593A1 · Anderson · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070294026A1 · Schirmer · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090080673A1 · Laurent · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090259363A1 · Li et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090326750A1 · Ang · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100106603A1 · Dey et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114474A1 · Suganuma et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100217467A1 · de la Torre Bueno · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100305799A1 · Yamada · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110029168A1 · Talberg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110137535A1 · Goto et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120221216A1 · Chauncey et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130110367A1 · To et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130116870A1 · Harty · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150112526A1 · Martin et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150298680A1 · Matthews · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160231123A1 · Morisaki · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170080919A1 · Follen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170144650A1 · Nagamiya et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180276859A1 · Park et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180334157A1 · Tanaka · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190107406A1 · Cox et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190359223A1 · Duale et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200011687A1 · Lindemann et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200080859A1 · Payne et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210018324A1 · Sujan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210046918A1 · Pan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210215493A1 · Kapadia et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220289215A1 · Kamezaki et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220314878A1 · Nagatani · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 4307273A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
ES 2395576T3 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 18/651,430, entitled “Intelligent Eco Mode Optimization for Battery Electric Vehicles,” filed Apr. 30, 2024; 53 pages. [cited by applicant]
M.T. Von Srbik, R.F. Martinez-Botas, Vehicle Optimisation for regenerative brake energy maximisation, Editor(s): Gaydon, Warwickshire, Sustainable Vehicle Technologies, Woodhead Publishing, 2012, pp. 165-174, ISBN 97808… [cited by applicant]
M. Araya-López, V. Thomas, O. Buffet and F. Charpillet, “A Closer Look at MOMDPs,” 2010 22nd IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Arras, France, 2010, pp. 197-204, doi: 10.1109/ICTAI.2010… [cited by applicant]
Pineda, L., Kyle Hollins Wray and S. Zilberstein. Fast SSP Solvers Using Short-Sighted Labeling. AAA In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017). [cited by applicant]
Blai Bonet and Héctor Geffner. 2003. Labeled RTDP: improving the convergence of real-time dynamic programming. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on International Conference on Automated Planning … [cited by applicant]
Multiple Criteria Decision Making, http://www.springer.corn/series/13834. (279 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ramazanoglu et al., Spontaneous scalarization with massive fields, Physical Review, 2016. (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al., A Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Management Strategy Using Stochastic Model Predictive Control With Road Grade Preview, IEEE Transactions On Control Systems Technology, Nov. 2015, vol. 23 No. 6. (2… [cited by applicant]