IP Library Granted Patent US 11,850,761
Granted Patent B2
US 11,850,761 · App. 18/157,631 · Granted Dec 26, 2023

Robotic sortation system

Inventors: Justin Peterson (Louisville, KY); Thomas Gallagher (Simpsonville, KY); Gary Giuliano (Cincinnati, OH); Justin Zimmer (Dayton, OH); Stephen Dryer (Cincinnati, OH); Matt Wicks (St. Charles, MO)
Assignee: Intelligrated Headquarters, LLC
B25J9/1697B07C5/362B25J13/08B25J19/04B07C2501/0063
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,850,761
App. No.
18/157,631
Granted
Dec 26, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatus, computing devices, computing entities, and/or the like associated with a robotic sortation system are provided. An example method may include receiving imaging data associated with a first item at a first sorting location of a material handling system, determining a sorting destination for the first item based at least in part on the imaging data, determining a plurality of first-tier robotic devices and a plurality of second-tier robotic devices based at least in part on the first sorting location and the sorting destination, and generating a first sortation scheme for the first item.

Claims (40)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

receiving imaging data associated with a first item at a first sorting location of a material handling system;

determining a sorting destination for the first item based at least in part on the imaging data;

determining a plurality of first-tier robotic devices and a plurality of second-tier robotic devices from one or more robotic devices based at least in part on the first sorting location and the sorting destination;

generating a first sortation scheme for the first item, wherein the first sortation scheme indicates a first sortation path associated with at least one of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices and at least one of the plurality of second-tier robotic devices of the material handling system; and

causing the at least one of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices and the at least one of the plurality of second-tier robotic devices to transport the first item based at least in part on the first sortation scheme.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an item identification associated with the first item based at least in part on the imaging data, wherein determining the sorting destination is further based on the item identification.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the imaging data comprises a scanned image of the first item, wherein determining the item identification further comprises identifying an item label based on the scanned image.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of second-tier robotic devices is downstream of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices in the first sortation path.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting a first-tier robotic device from the plurality of first-tier robotic devices; and selecting a second sorting location associated with a second-tier robotic device of the plurality of second-tier robotic devices.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising:

determining a corresponding load indicator associated with each of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices, wherein the corresponding load indicator indicates a number of items that are assigned to each of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices, wherein selecting the first-tier robotic device is based at least in part on the corresponding load indicator.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising calculating a corresponding processing time of each of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices based at least in part on the corresponding load indicator, wherein selecting the first-tier robotic device is further based on the corresponding processing time.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein selecting the first-tier robotic device further comprises determining a corresponding schedule indicator associated with each of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices, wherein selecting the first-tier robotic device is based at least in part on the corresponding schedule indicator.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the corresponding schedule indicator indicates a maintenance schedule associated with each of the plurality of first-tier robotic devices.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein selecting the second sorting location associated with the second-tier robotic device further comprises determining a corresponding load indicator associated with each of the plurality of second-tier robotic devices, wherein selecting the second sorting location is based at least in part on the corresponding load indicator.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein selecting the second sorting location associated with the second-tier robotic device further comprises determining a corresponding schedule indicator associated with each of the plurality of second-tier robotic devices, wherein selecting the second sorting location is based at least in part on the corresponding schedule indicator.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising:

causing the second-tier robotic device to transport the first item from the second sorting location to the sorting destination.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a plurality of sorting locations based at least in part on the first sorting location and the sorting destination; and

determining the first sortation path based at least in part on the plurality of sorting locations.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

determining a plurality of placement locations for the one or more robotic devices to execute the first sortation path.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

calculating a plurality of candidate paths associated with one or more of the plurality of sorting locations;

calculating a plurality of transport times associated with the plurality of candidate paths;

and

selecting a candidate path, from the plurality of candidate paths, that is associated with a least transport time among the plurality of transport times.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein each of the plurality of candidate paths is associated with at least one robotic device of the one or more robotic devices.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first sortation path is associated with a first robotic device and a second robotic device, wherein the second robotic device is downstream in the first sortation path of the first robotic device, wherein the computer-implemented method further comprises:

causing the first robotic device to transport the first item to a second sorting location associated with the second robotic device;

in response to determining that the second robotic device is associated with a predefined indicator, determining a third robotic device from the one or more robotic devices; and

causing the third robotic device to transport the first item from the second sorting location to the sorting destination.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein the predefined indicator comprises at least one of: (1) an indication that the second robotic device is offline, or (2) an error message associated with the second robotic device.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein determining the third robotic device from the one or more robotic devices further comprises:

calculating a plurality of processing times associated with the one or more robotic devices; and

selecting the third robotic device associated with a least processing time among the plurality of processing times.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a corresponding presorting scheme indicating the first sorting location for the first item.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 24, 2026
From: HAND HELD PRODUCTS INC.
To: INTELLIGRATED HEADQUARTERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 074948/0821 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 20, 2023
From: WICKS, MATT; PETERSON, JUSTIN; GALLAGHER, THOMAS; GIULIANO, GARY; ZIMMER, JUSTIN; DRYER, STEPHEN
To: INTELLIGRATED HEADQUARTERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 062442/0939 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16781877 · Feb 4, 2020
Provisional Application 62869900 · Jul 2, 2019
Related Publication 20230158680A1 · May 25, 2023