IP Library Granted Patent US 12,203,425
Granted Patent B2
US 12,203,425 · App. 18/160,757 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Method and system for measuring fueling quantity variation during multipulse fuel injection event

Inventors: Jalal Syed (Indianpolis, IN); Donald J. Benson (Columbus, IN); David Michael Carey (Bend, OR); Sanjay Manglam (Franklin, IN)
Assignee: Cummins Inc.
F02D41/3809F02D41/3818F02D41/401F02D41/403
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,203,425
App. No.
18/160,757
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides a method for analyzing and optimizing the injection of fluid into an internal combustion engine via a common rail system. Once various injection parameters are determined for a given injection system, these data may be used to model the effect of sequential injection events for the system. A processer can then be used to run the model and to adjust sequential fuel injection events to optimize engine performance and fuel usage.

Claims (24)

1. A method for optimizing fluid injection into an engine via a common rail system, comprising:

determining, by a processing unit, a fueling interaction quantity indicating an amount of fueling interaction between a pilot pulse and a main pulse of a multipulse fuel injection event;

determining, by the processing unit, an adjustment to be made to the pilot pulse or the main pulse using a fueling interaction model involving the multipulse fuel injection event based on the amount of fueling interaction, the determining including (a) in response to a target main injection pulse quantity exceeding the fueling interaction quantity, subtracting the fueling interaction quantity from the target main injection pulse quantity to determine a first adjusted fuel quantity as the adjustment and (b) in response to the target main injection pulse quantity not exceeding the fueling interaction quantity subtracting the target main injection pulse quantity from the fueling interaction quantity and adding an adjustment term to determine a second adjusted fuel quantity differing from the first adjusted fuel quantity as the adjustment; and

performing, by the processing unit, the determined adjustment on the pilot pulse or the main pulse.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising increasing, by the processing unit, a separation between the pilot pulse and the main pulse to allow the sensor to measure the amount of fueling interaction between the pilot pulse and the main pulse.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determined adjustment includes a change in fuel quantity to be delivered during the main pulse.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adjustment is determined using the fueling interaction model which involves as an input one or more of: an initial pressure, a commanded pulse separation, a fueling quantity of the pilot pulse, or a fueling quantity of the main pulse.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adapting the fueling interaction model based on operating conditions and the fueling interaction, the operating conditions including one or more of: an initial pressure, a commanded pulse separation, a fueling quantity of the pilot pulse, or a fueling quantity of the main pulse.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising temporarily deactivating a pump coupled with the common rail system when the amount of fueling interaction is being measured.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the fueling interaction model includes a lookup table.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the amount of fueling interaction is filtered through Kalman filter to produce a predicted fueling interaction value, the method further comprising: comparing, by the processing unit, the predicted fueling interaction value with a target main pulse fuel quantity and determining an adjusted on-time fuel injection.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein when the target main pulse fuel quantity is greater than the predicted fueling interaction, an adapted fuel quantity is calculated by calculating a difference between the target main pulse fuel quantity and the predicted fueling interaction, the adapted fuel quantity is used to determine the adjusted on-time fuel injection.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein when the target main pulse fuel quantity is not greater than the predicted fueling interaction, an adjustment fuel quantity is calculated based on the target main pulse fuel quantity and the predicted fuel interaction, the adjustment fuel quantity is used to determine the adjusted on-time fuel injection.

11. An engine fuel system comprising:

a rail;

a plurality of fuel injectors fluidly coupled to the rail, the fuel injectors configured to inject fuel therefrom;

a control system comprising at least one sensor and a processing unit operatively coupled to the plurality of fuel injectors, the at least one sensor configured to measure an amount of fueling interaction between a pilot pulse and a main pulse during a multipulse fuel injection event, the processing unit configured to:

determine a fueling interaction quantity indicating the amount of fueling interaction between the pilot pulse and the main pulse of the multipulse fuel injection event;

determine an adjustment to be made to the pilot pulse or the main pulse using a fueling interaction model involving the multipulse fuel injection event based on the measured amount of fueling interaction, wherein to determine the adjustment, the processing unit one of (a) in response to a target main injection pulse quantity exceeding the fueling interaction quantity, subtracts the fueling interaction quantity from the target main injection pulse quantity to determine a first adjusted fuel quantity as the adjustment and (b) in response to the target main injection pulse quantity not exceeding the fueling interaction quantity subtracts the target main injection pulse quantity from the fueling interaction quantity and adds an adjustment term to determine a second adjusted fuel quantity differing from the first adjusted fuel quantity as the adjustment; and

perform the determined adjustment on the pilot pulse or the main pulse.

12. The engine fuel system of claim 11 , wherein the processing unit increases a separation between the pilot pulse and the main pulse to allow the sensor to measure the amount of fueling interaction between the pilot pulse and the main pulse.

13. The engine fuel system of claim 11 , wherein the determined adjustment includes a change in fuel quantity to be delivered during the main pulse, and the adjustment is determined using a fueling interaction model which involves as an input one or more of: initial pressure, commanded pulse separation, pilot pulse fuel quantities, or main pulse fuel quantities.

14. The engine fuel system of claim 11 , the processing unit further configured to adapt the fueling interaction model based on operating conditions of the plurality of injectors and the fueling interaction, the operating conditions including one or more of: an initial pressure, a commanded pulse separation, a fueling quantity of the pilot pulse, or a fueling quantity of the main pulse.

15. The engine fuel system of claim 11 , the processing unit further configured to temporarily deactivate the plurality of injectors coupled with the rail when measuring the amount of fueling interaction.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2025
From: CUMMINS INC.
To: CUMMINS SCANIA HPCR SYSTEM, LLC
Reel/Frame 073461/0792 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 9, 2023
From: SYED, JALAL; BENSON, DONALD J.; CAREY, DAVID MICHAEL; MANGLAM, SANJAY
To: CUMMINS INC.
Reel/Frame 062643/0493 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTUS2020044064 · Jul 29, 2020
Related Publication 20230175452A1 · Jun 8, 2023
References Cited (21)
US 7552709B2 · Fujii · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7628146B2 · Kloppenburg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7917281B2 · Yamada · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8646322B2 · Henner et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8863727B2 · Jalal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10066563B2 · Jalel · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10167809B1 · Domenech-Llopis et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10669965B2 · Braun · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20090177366A1 · Achleitner · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120303245A1 · Wang · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130019842A1 · Shaver et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140283792A1 · Benson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160017837A1 · Carey · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160084189A1 · Pursifull · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200271068A1 · Dodis · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220145840A1 · Bollinger · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220381191A1 · Staykov · 2022 [cited by examiner]
EP 1860312 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
GB 2344376 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016011111 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Appln. No. PCT/US20/44064, Oct. 15, 2020, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]