IP Library Granted Patent US 12,618,661
Granted Patent B2
US 12,618,661 · App. 18/162,780 · Granted May 5, 2026

Reducing stray magnetic field effect on an angle sensor

Inventors: Rémy Lassalle-Balier (Bures sur Yvette, FR); Jean-Michel Daga (Bourg-la-Reine, FR)
Assignee: Allegro MicroSystems, LLC
G01B7/30G01D5/16G01D5/24471G01R33/09
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,618,661
App. No.
18/162,780
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one aspect, an angle sensor includes a first linear sensor and a second linear sensor. A first magnetic-field direction of a target magnet measured by the first linear sensor is substantially equal to a second magnetic-field direction of the target magnet measured by the second linear sensor. The first linear sensor, the second linear sensor and the target magnet are on an axis. The angle sensor determines an angle of a magnetic field.

Claims (53)

1 . An angle sensor comprising:

a first linear sensor; and

a second linear sensor,

a first die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the first linear sensor being disposed on the first surface of the first die;

a second die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the second linear sensor being disposed on the second surface of the second die;

wherein a first magnetic-field direction of a target magnet measured by the first linear sensor is substantially equal to a second magnetic-field direction of the target magnet measured by the second linear sensor,

wherein the first linear sensor, the second linear sensor and the target magnet are on an axis,

wherein the angle sensor determines an angle of a magnetic field by:

detecting an amplitude and direction of a magnetic field at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor; and

calculating a difference between the magnetic field detected at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor; and

wherein the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor have a linear range equal to a maximum field range from the target magnet plus twice a maximum amplitude of a stray magnetic field, such that the first and second linear sensor each remain within a linear region, allowing the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor to avoid a saturation region.

2 . The angle sensor of claim 1 , wherein the first linear sensor is disposed along a first plane and the second linear sensor is disposed along a second plane; and

wherein the first plane and the second plane are each perpendicular to the axis.

3 . The angle sensor of claim 2 , wherein the target magnet is disposed along a third plane and the third plane is perpendicular to the axis.

4 . The angle sensor of claim 1 , wherein the first and second linear sensors are two-dimensional (2-D) sensors.

5 . The angle sensor of claim 1 , further comprising a spacer layer in direct contact with the second surface of the first die and the first surface of the second die.

6 . The angle sensor of claim 5 , wherein the spacer separates the first die from the second die by about 25 microns.

7 . The angle sensor of claim 1 , further comprising a printed circuit board (PCB) electrically connected to the first die by a wire.

8 . The angle sensor of claim 7 , wherein the second die is disposed in a flip-chip structure having solder balls in direct contact with the PCB.

9 . The angle sensor of claim 1 , wherein the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor are spaced apart by about 1 millimeter.

10 . An angle sensor comprising:

a first linear sensor;

a second linear sensor;

a first die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the first linear sensor being disposed on the first surface of the first die;

a second die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the second linear sensor being disposed on the second surface of the second die;

a spacer layer in direct contact with the second surface of the first die and the first surface of the second die; and

a printed circuit board (PCB) electrically connected to the first die by a wire,

wherein a first magnetic-field direction of a target magnet measured by the first linear sensor is substantially equal to a second magnetic-field direction of the target magnet measured by the second linear sensor,

wherein the first linear sensor, the second linear sensor and the target magnet are on an axis, and

wherein the angle sensor determines an angle of a magnetic field by:

detecting an amplitude and direction of a magnetic field at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor; and

calculating a difference between the magnetic field detected at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor, and

wherein the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor have a linear range equal to a maximum field range from the target magnet plus twice a maximum amplitude of a stray magnetic field, such that the first and second linear sensor each remain within a linear region, allowing the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor to avoid a saturation region.

11 . The angle sensor of claim 10 , wherein the spacer separates the first die from the second die by about 25 microns.

12 . The angle sensor of claim 10 , wherein the second die is disposed in a flip-chip structure having solder balls in direct contact with the PCB.

13 . The angle sensor of claim 10 , wherein the first and second linear sensors are two-dimensional (2-D) sensors.

14 . The angle sensor of claim 10 , wherein the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor are spaced apart by about 1 millimeter.

15 . The angle sensor of claim 10 , wherein the first linear sensor and/or the second linear sensor includes a magnetoresistance element.

16 . An angle sensor comprising:

a first linear sensor; and

a second linear sensor,

a first die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the first linear sensor being disposed on the first surface of the first die;

a second die having a first surface and an opposing second surface, the second linear sensor being disposed on the second surface of the second die;

wherein a first magnetic-field direction of a target magnet measured by the first linear sensor is substantially equal to a second magnetic-field direction of the target magnet measured by the second linear sensor,

wherein the first linear sensor, the second linear sensor and the target magnet are on an axis,

wherein the angle sensor determines an angle of a magnetic field by:

detecting an amplitude and direction of a magnetic field at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor; and

calculating a difference between the magnetic field detected at the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor; and

wherein the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor have a linear range equal to a maximum field range from the target magnet plus twice a maximum amplitude of a stray magnetic field, such that the first and second linear sensor each remain within a linear region, allowing the first linear sensor and the second linear sensor to avoid a saturation region.

17 . The angle sensor of claim 16 , wherein the first linear sensor is disposed along a first plane and the second linear sensor is disposed along a second plane; and

wherein the first plane and the second plane are each perpendicular to the axis.

18 . The angle sensor of claim 17 , wherein the target magnet is disposed along a third plane and the third plane is perpendicular to the axis.

19 . The angle sensor of claim 18 , wherein the first and second linear sensors are two-dimensional (2-D) sensors.

Assignments (2)
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 22, 2023
From: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS THE COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064068/0459 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 1, 2023
From: LASSALLE-BALIER, RÉMY; DAGA, JEAN-MICHEL; ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS EUROPE LIMITED; CRIVASENSE TECHNOLOGIES SAS
To: ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 062557/0633 →
Continuity (2)
Division 16800229 · Feb 25, 2020
Related Publication 20240255270A1 · Aug 1, 2024
References Cited (75)
US 6131457A · Sato · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6288533B1 · Haeberli et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6489761B1 · Schroeder et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6550150B1 · Shirai et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6580269B2 · Hiligsmann et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7768083B2 · Doogue et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7906961B2 · Abwa · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7932718B1 · Wiegert · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8089276B2 · Kentsch · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8575929B1 · Wiegert · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8629520B2 · Doogue et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8952471B2 · Doogue et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9046383B2 · Friedrich et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9082957B2 · Doogue et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9625535B2 · Cadugan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9797746B2 · Vuillermet et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9852832B2 · Sirohiwala et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9859489B2 · Doogue et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10069063B2 · Doogue et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10401193B2 · Mehnert et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10533877B2 · Zimmer · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10591274B2 · Ausserlechner · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10670669B2 · Lassalle-Balier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11719527B2 · Lassalle-Balier · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20060038557A1 · Johnson · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080184799A1 · Phan Le et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090267594A1 · Kather · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110298447A1 · Foletto et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120012700A1 · Eriksen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120086444A1 · Chen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120274563A1 · Olsson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120280679A1 · Shelton · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130147642A1 · Rubio et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261990A1 · Ura · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20180259594A1 · Fernandez et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190235032A1 · Lassalle-Balier · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190250222A1 · Friedrich et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190265018A1 · Latham et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190271568A1 · Kozomora et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190383646A1 · Lassalle-Balier et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200041310A1 · Lassalle-Balier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200057097A1 · Vuillermet et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200088546A1 · Sirohiwala et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116800A1 · Lassalle-Balier et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210262777A1 · Lassalle-Balier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
DE-102006057970-A1, Auburger (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/999,122, filed Aug. 17, 2018, Vuillermet et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/157,317, filed Oct. 11, 2018, Lassalle-Balier et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/244,452, filed Jan. 10, 2019, Lassalle-Balier et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/254,874, filed Jan. 23, 2019, Weiland et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/507,544, filed Jul. 10, 2019, David et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/507,552, filed Jul. 10, 2019, Lassallie-Balier et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/507,560, filed Jul. 10, 2019, Lassalle-Balier et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/683,800, filed Nov. 14, 2019, David et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Response to U.S. 1 [cited by applicant]
U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Response to U.S. 2 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 30, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/960,910; 12 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; Response filed Apr. 1, 2022; 1 Page. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; Response filed Jun. 9, 2022; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; 27 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to U.S. Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; Response filed Dec. 14, 2022; 17 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 23, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; 11 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Rule 312 Amendment filed Jan. 30, 2023 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/800,229; 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]