IP Library Granted Patent US 12,548,166
Granted Patent B2
US 12,548,166 · App. 18/176,911 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Quantitative imaging biomarker for lung cancer

Inventors: Lin Lu (New York, NY); Binsheng Zhao (New York, NY); Lawrence H. Schwartz (New York, NY)
Assignee: The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York
G06T7/136G06T7/0012G16H10/60G16H30/20G06T2207/10081G06T2207/30064
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,548,166
App. No.
18/176,911
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one or more implementations, systems, methods and computer implemented processes are provided that are directed to a method of treating a subject with a lung tumor, the method comprising: obtaining computed tomography (CT) image slices of the subject, wherein the CT image slices comprise images of the lung tumor. In a further implementation, the systems, methods and computer implemented processes are directed to identifying a first CT image slice where the lung tumor has a largest diameter among the CT image slices; and determining intensity-skewness of the lung tumor on the first CT image slice. In a further implementation, the systems, methods and computer implemented processes are directed to treating the subject with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, if the intensity-skewness is no greater than −1.5.

Claims (118)

1 . A method of treating a subject with a lung tumor, the method comprising:

(a) obtaining computed tomography (CT) image slices of the subject, wherein the CT image slices comprise images of the lung tumor;

(b) identifying a first CT image slice where the lung tumor has a largest diameter among the CT image slices;

(c) determining intensity-skewness of the lung tumor on the first CT image slice;

(d) classifying the subject to one of disease-free-survival (DFS)-associated histologic subgroup based on a comparison of the intensity-skewness to a threshold value; and

(e) treating the subject with at least one of surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, where the intensity-skewness is no greater than the threshold value.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the intensity-skewness is:

Intensity_Skewness

=

1

N

i

=

1

N

(

X

(

i

)

-

X

¯

)

3

(

1

N

i

=

1

N

(

X

(

i

)

-

X

¯

)

2

)

3

wherein the first CT image slice N pixels: 1, . . . ith, . . . N, X(i) being an intensity of the ith pixel within the first CT image slice, X being a mean intensity of all pixels within the first CT image slice.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold value is accessed from a pre-trained machine learning model configured to output a value that corresponds to the demarcation between a first disease-free-survival (DFS)-associated histologic subgroup and a second disease-free-survival (DFS)-associated histologic subgroup-, wherein the pre-trained model is trained using a training set of CT images.

4 . A method for treating a subject with a lung tumor, the method comprising:

(a) obtaining computed tomography (CT) image slices of the subject, wherein the CT image slices comprise images of the lung tumor;

(b) identifying a first CT image slice where the lung tumor has a largest diameter among the CT image slices;

(c) determining intensity-skewness of the lung tumor on the first CT image slice;

(d) determining that the lung tumor is a mid/poor disease-free-survival (DFS)-associated histologic subgroup, if the intensity-skewness is no greater than −1.5; and

(e) treating the subject with at least one of surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein intensity-skewness is:

Intensity_Skewness

=

1

N

i

=

1

N

(

X

(

i

)

-

X

¯

)

3

(

1

N

i

=

1

N

(

X

(

i

)

-

X

¯

)

2

)

3

wherein the first CT image slice has N pixels: 1, . . . ith, . . . N, X(i) being an intensity of the ith pixel within the first CT image slice, X being a mean intensity of all pixels within the first CT image slice.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lung tumor is lung adenocarcinoma.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the lung adenocarcinoma is invasive adenocarcinoma.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the lung adenocarcinoma is acinar predominant (ACI) adenocarcinoma, papillary predominant (PAP) adenocarcinoma, micropapillary predominant (MIP) adenocarcinoma, and solid predominant (SOL) adenocarcinoma; or invasive mucinous (MUC) adenocarcinoma.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the lung tumor is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the chemotherapy comprises a platinum-based antineoplastic drug.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the platinum-based antineoplastic drug is cisplatin and/or or carboplatin.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the chemotherapy comprises gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, pemetrexed, etoposide, vinorelbine, topotecan, irinotecan, or combinations thereof.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the surgery comprises a wedge resection.

14 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the lung tumor is lung adenocarcinoma.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the lung adenocarcinoma is acinar predominant (ACI) adenocarcinoma, papillary predominant (PAP) adenocarcinoma, micropapillary predominant (MIP) adenocarcinoma, and solid predominant (SOL) adenocarcinoma; or invasive mucinous (MUC) adenocarcinoma.

16 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the lung tumor is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 20, 2023
From: LU, LIN; ZHAO, BINSHENG; SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H.
To: THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Reel/Frame 064327/0887 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2021048846 · Sep 2, 2021
Provisional Application 63073477 · Sep 2, 2020
Related Publication 20230351607A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (46)
US 10156575B2 · Lebowitz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10339648B2 · Stringfield et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10339653B2 · Gillies et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20080317314A1 · Schwartz · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20120071334A1 · Colpitts et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150356730A1 · Grove · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170358079A1 · Gillies · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180018757A1 · Suzuki · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180068083A1 · Cohen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019300A1 · Simpson · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190125279A1 · Peikert · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200211180A1 · Gillies et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210003555A1 · Ferte · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210169349A1 · Madabhushi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO 2016191567A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017165801A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT/US2021/048846, mailed on Jan. 31, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Ferlay et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods, Int. J. Cancer. 2019; 144(8): pp. 1941-1953. [cited by applicant]
Travis WD. Classification of lung cancer. Semin Roentgenol. 2011; 46(3): pp. 178-186. [cited by applicant]
Tsao et al. Subtype classification of lung adenocarcinoma predicts benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing complete resection, J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(30): pp. 3439-3446. [cited by applicant]
Aerts et al . . . Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat. Commun. 2014; 5: pp. 4006. [cited by applicant]
Bi et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019; 69(2): pp. 127-57. [cited by applicant]
Ikeda et al: “Differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacity nodules: CT number analysis is by three-dimensional computerized quantification”: Chest, vol. 132, Issue 3, pp. 984-990, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Mezheyeuski et al.: “Multispectral imaging for quantitative and compartment-specific immune infiltrates reveals distinct immune profiles that classify lung cancer patients”, J Pathol, vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. 421-431, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ardila et al: “End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography”, Nat. Med. Vol. 25, Issue 6, pp. 954-961, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al.: “Accurate classification of non-small cell lung cancer pathology and mapping of EGFR mutation spatial distribution by ambient mass spectrometry imaging.” Front Oncol, vol. 9, p. 804, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Tunali et al.: “Stability and reproducibility of computed tomography radiomic features extracted from peritumoral regions of lung cancer lesions.” Med Phys, vol. 46, Issue 11, pp. 5075-5085, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Aerts: NIH Grant #: 5U01CA190234-05: “Genotype and imaging phenotype biomarkers in lung cancer”, Award Notice Date: Dec. 18, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Clinical Trial #: NCT02095808; Feasibility Study Using Imaging Biomarkers in Lung Cancer, first posted: Mar. 26, 2014. [cited by applicant]
NIH grant 5U01CA225431-02, “Integrating Radiomics into S0819 and Lung-MAP, Biomarker Driven Clinical Trials for Lung Cancer”, Award Notice Date: Jun. 6, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lu et al., A quantitative imaging biomarker for predicting disease-free-survival-associated histologic subgroups in lung adenocarcinoma, Eur. Radiol. 2020; 30(7):3614-3623. [cited by applicant]
Armato et al. The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) and Image Database Resource Initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Med Phys. 2011; 38(2):915-931. [cited by applicant]
Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine learning. 1996; 24(2): 123-140. [cited by applicant]
Breiman L. Random forests. Machine learning. 2001; 45(1): 5-32. [cited by applicant]
Cortes et al., Support-vector networks. Machine learning. 1995; 20(3): 273-297. [cited by applicant]
Fedorov et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9): 1323-1341. [cited by applicant]
Ko et al. Lung Adenocarcinoma: Correlation of Quantitative CT Findings with Pathologic Findings. Radiology. 2016; 280(3): 931-939. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al. Predicting the protein SUMO modification sites based on Properties Sequential Forward Selection (PSFS). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007; 358(1): 136-139. [cited by applicant]
Peng et al. Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005; 27(8): 1226-1238. [cited by applicant]
Robnik-Šikonja et al., An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (ICML'97); 1997. [cited by applicant]
Roth et al. Improving Computer-Aided Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Random View Aggregation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016; 35(5): 1170-1181. [cited by applicant]
Tachibana et al., Automatic segmentation of pulmonary nodules on CT images by use of NCI lung image database consortium. Proceedings vol. 6144, Medical Imaging 2006: Image Processing; 61440M (2006). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al. Segmentation of lung nodules in computed tomography images using dynamic programming and multidirection fusion techniques. Acad Radiology. 2009; 16(6): 678-688. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. A Response Assessment Platform for Development and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology. Tomography. 2016; 2(4): 406-410. [cited by applicant]
Zhang P. Model selection via multifold cross validation. The Annals of Statistics. 1993, 21(1): 299-313. [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al. Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 23428. [cited by applicant]