IP Library Granted Patent US 12,530,776
Granted Patent B2
US 12,530,776 · App. 18/189,467 · Granted Jan 20, 2026

Image processing method and apparatus

Inventors: Niko Nevatie (Helsinki, FI); Erkki Parkkulainen (Helsinki, FI)
Assignee: TGI SPORT VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
G06T7/11G06T7/194G06T2207/20081G06T2207/30196G06T2207/30221
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,530,776
App. No.
18/189,467
Granted
Jan 20, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the present invention relate to a computer-implemented training method for training a segmentation model to segment an image. The method includes receiving a plurality of first training data sets. The first training data sets each include first image data representing a first image consisting of a background or of a foreground and first annotation data identifying the presence solely of the background or the foreground in the first image. The first image data is captured by at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device. The method includes, for each first training data set, processing the first image data using the segmentation model to generate a first candidate segmentation; and supplying the first annotation data to an error calculating algorithm to determine a first error for the first candidate segmentation. The segmentation model is updated in dependence on the determined first error. According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a system for training a segmentation model to segment an image. Aspects of the present invention also relate to an image processing system and method.

Claims (51)

1 . A computer-implemented training method for training a segmentation model to segment an image, the method comprising receiving a plurality of first training data sets, the first training data sets each comprising:

first image data representing a first image consisting of a background, the first image data being captured by at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device; and

first annotation data identifying the presence solely of the background in the first image;

wherein the method comprises, for each first training data set:

processing the first image data automatically to generate a background composition data set defining a composition of at least a portion of the background of the first image represented by the first image data, the processing of the first image data comprising identifying background features having at least one of a fixed shape and a fixed profile;

processing the first image data using the segmentation model to generate a first candidate segmentation, the segmentation model using the background composition data when segmenting the first image;

supplying the first annotation data to an error calculating algorithm to determine a first error for the first candidate segmentation; and

updating the segmentation model in dependence on the determined first error.

2 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises updating the segmentation model to generate a first updated segmentation model.

3 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises generating the first annotation data by processing first segmentation data for differentiating between the foreground and the background of the first image.

4 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the first segmentation data is captured by at least one non-visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device at at least substantially the same time as the first image data is captured by the at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device.

5 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises receiving a plurality of second training data sets, the second training data sets each comprising:

second image data representing a second image comprising a foreground and a background, the second image data being captured by at least one visible light imaging device.

6 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the second training data sets each comprise second segmentation data for differentiating between the foreground and the background of the second image;

wherein the method comprises, for each second training data set:

generating a second target segmentation in dependence on the second segmentation data;

processing the second image data set using the segmentation model to generate a second candidate segmentation;

comparing the second candidate segmentation and the second target segmentation to determine a second error between the second candidate segmentation and the second target segmentation; and

updating the segmentation model in dependence on the determined second error.

7 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 6 , wherein the method comprises updating the segmentation model in dependence on the second training output to generate a second updated segmentation model.

8 . A computer-implemented training method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the first segmentation data is captured by at least one non-visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device.

9 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium having a set of instructions stored therein which, when executed, cause a processor to perform the method claimed in claim 1 .

10 . An image segmentation system for segmenting an image, the image segmentation system comprising one or more processors, wherein the one or more processors is configured to implement a segmentation model trained according to the method claimed in claim 1 .

11 . A content replacement system for replacing the content of an image, the content replacement system comprising an image segmentation system as claimed in claim 10 .

12 . A system for training a segmentation model to segment an image into one or more segments, the system comprising at least one processor and at least one memory device, the at least one processor comprising at least one input configured to receive a plurality of first training data sets, the first training data sets each comprising:

first image data representing a first image consisting of a background or of a foreground, the first image data being captured by at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device; and

first annotation data identifying the presence solely of the background or the foreground in the first image;

wherein, in respect of each of the plurality of first training data sets, the at least one processor being configured to:

process the first image data automatically to generate a background composition data set defining a composition of at least a portion of the background of the first image represented by the first image data, the processing of the first image data comprising identifying background features having at least one of a fixed shape and a fixed profile;

process the first image data using the segmentation model to segment the first image to generate a first candidate segmentation, the segmentation model using the background composition data when segmenting the first image;

supply the first annotation data to an error calculating algorithm to determine a first error for the first candidate segmentation; and

update the segmentation model in dependence on the determined first error.

13 . A system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to update the segmentation model to generate a first updated segmentation model.

14 . A system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to generate the first annotation data by processing first segmentation data for differentiating between the foreground and the background of the first image.

15 . A system as claimed in claim 14 , wherein the first segmentation data is captured by at least one non-visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device at at least substantially the same time as the first image data is captured by the at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device.

16 . A system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to receive a plurality of second training data sets, the second training data sets each comprising:

second image data representing a second image comprising a foreground and a background, the second image data being captured by at least one visible light imaging device.

17 . A system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the second training data sets each comprise second segmentation data for differentiating between the foreground and the background of the second image;

wherein, in respect of each of the plurality of second training data sets, the at least one processor is configured to:

process the second image data set using the segmentation model to generate a second candidate segmentation;

compare the second candidate segmentation and the second target segmentation to determine a second error between the second candidate segmentation and the second target segmentation; and

update the segmentation model in dependence on the determined second error.

18 . A system as claimed in claim 17 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to update the segmentation model in dependence on the second training output to generate a second updated segmentation model.

19 . A system as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the first segmentation data is captured by at least one non-visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device.

20 . An image processing system for processing an image, the image processing system comprising one or more processors having an electrical input for receiving first image data captured by at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device and representing a first image comprising a foreground and a background;

wherein the one or more processors is configured to:

process the first image data automatically to generate a background composition data set defining a composition of at least a portion of the background of the first image represented by the first image data, the processing of the first image data comprising identifying background features having at least one of a fixed shape and a fixed profile;

implement a segmentation model, the segmentation model being configured to segment the first image to differentiate between the foreground and the background of the first image;

wherein the segmentation model uses the background composition data when segmenting the first image.

21 . A computer-implemented method of processing a first image, the method comprising receiving first image data captured by at least one visible electromagnetic radiation imaging device and representing a first image comprising a foreground and a background;

wherein the method comprises implementing a segmentation model to segment the first image to differentiate between the foreground and the background of the first image, the segmentation model being trained using the computer-implemented training method claimed in claim 1 .

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 3, 2025
From: SUPPONOR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: TGI SPORT VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 073104/0398 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2023
From: NEVATIE, NIKO; PARKKULAINEN, ERKKI
To: SUPPONOR TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 063987/0042 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 2204202 · Mar 24, 2022 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230326031A1 · Oct 12, 2023
References Cited (80)
US 9965865B1 · Agrawal et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10242449B2 · Liston et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10255681B2 · Price · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10713794B1 · He et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10860836B1 · Tyagi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11341653B2 · Kim et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 12086995B2 · Benou et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12165284B2 · Zhang et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20050001852A1 · Dengler et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20150163416A1 · Nevatie · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160028968A1 · Affaticati · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170324889A1 · Nevatie et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180176484A1 · Nevatie · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180189951A1 · Liston et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180253865A1 · Price et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180324382A1 · Rantalainen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190220983A1 · Price et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190222777A1 · Lovemelt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200267334A1 · Cyrus · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200364877A1 · Bradski et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210166393A1 · Ramani et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210279503A1 · Qi et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210366128A1 · Kim et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220044365A1 · Zhang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220044366A1 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058369A1 · Alahmari et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220222791A1 · Zhang · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220262009A1 · Yu et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230306611A1 · Nevatie · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230306612A1 · Nevatie · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230306613A1 · Nevatie et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230326030A1 · Nevatie · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 108229478A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108596184A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 110188760A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110189341A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110246145A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111260679A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111667027A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112116625A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112232364A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 112489047A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113192072A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 110189341B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 113515968A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 114782460B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
GB 2560219A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013186278A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020021067A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020156303A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022048151A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International Application No. PCT/EP2023/057625, Jul. 3, 2023, 17 pp. [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International Application No. PCT/EP2023/057628, Jul. 3, 2023, 17 pp. [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International Application No. PCT/EP2023/057618, Jul. 3, 2023, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International Application No. PCT/EP2023/057624, Jul. 3, 2023, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
“International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority”, International Application No. PCT/EP2023/057626, Jul. 3, 2023, 18 pp. [cited by applicant]
Arabi, Hossein , et al., “Does Prior Knowledge Enhance Accuracy of Deep Learning-assisted Semantic Segmentation?”, 2021 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Piscataway, NJ, USA, Oct. … [cited by applicant]
Chen, Yuhua, et al., “Learning Semantic Segmentation from Synthetic Data: A Geometrically Guided Input-Output Adaptation Approach”, arXiv:1812.05040v2, Arxiv.org, Cornell University, Jan. 13, 2019, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Yuhua, et al., “Learning Semantic Segmentation from Synthetic Data: A Geometrically Guided Input-Output Adaptation Approach”, ArXiv:1812.05040v1, Arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, Dec. 12, 2018, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
Cheng, Gong , et al., “Prototype-CNN for Few-Shot Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, May 19, 2021, 10 pp. [cited by applicant]
Dmitriev, Konstantin , et al., “Learning Multi-Class Segmentations From Single-Class Datasets”, 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA, Jun. 15, 2020, pp. 9493-95… [cited by applicant]
El Jurdi, Rosana , et al., “High-level prior-based loss functions for medical image segmentation: A survey”, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 210, Jul. 21, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Ghassab, Vahid Khorasani, et al., “REP-Model: A deep learning framework for replacing ad billboards in soccer videos”, 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), Naples Italy, Dec. 2, 2020, pp. 149-153. [cited by applicant]
Hou, Qiqi , et al., “Context-Aware Image Matting for Simultaneous Foreground and Alpha Estimation”, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 27, 2019, pp. 4129-4138. [cited by applicant]
Naveed, Humza , “Survey: Image Mixing and Deleting for Data Augmentation”, arXiv:2106.07085v2, Arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, Nov. 1, 2021, 15 pp. [cited by applicant]
No Name , “Using FCNN for multi-class semantic segmentation trained on single class labeled image data”, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/502896/using-fcnn-for-multi-class-seman… [cited by applicant]
Wang, Kaixin , et al., “PANet: Few-Shot Image Semantic Segmentation with Prototype Alignment”, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 27, 2019, pp. 9196-9205. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, Jiawei , et al., “ObjectAug: Object-level Data Augmentation for Semantic Image Segmentation”, 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Shenzhen, China, Jul. 18, 2021, 8 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17(5)”, GB Application No. GB2204198.2, Sep. 13, 2022, 3 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17(5)”, GB Application No. 2204204.8, Sep. 20, 2022, 4 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17(5)”, GB Application No. GB2204205.5, Sep. 20, 2022, 4 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17(5)”, GB Application No. 2204202.2, Sep. 22, 2022, 3 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Search Report under Section 17(5)”, GB Application No. GB2204196.6, Oct. 19, 2022, 6 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, GB Application No. GB2304305.2, Oct. 10, 2023, 5 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, GB Application No. GB2304308.6, Oct. 10, 2023, 6 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, GB Application No. GB2304294.8, Oct. 10, 2023, 9 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, GB Application No. GB2304303.7, Oct. 24, 2023, 12 pp. [cited by applicant]
“Patents Act 1977: Combined Search and Examination Report under Sections 17 and 18(3)”, GB Application No. GB2304297.1, Oct. 24, 2023, 9 pp. [cited by applicant]
Hou, Qiqi , et al., “Context-Aware Image Matting for Simultaneous Foreground and Alpha Estimation”, 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Soul, South Korea, Oct. 27, 2019, pp. 4129-4138. [cited by applicant]
Hu, et al., “Instance Segmentation based Semantic Matting for Compositing Applications”, 2019 16th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV), Kingston, QC, Canada, doi: 10.1109/CRV.2019.00026, 2019, pp. 135-142. [cited by applicant]