Joint soft tissue evaluation method
A method of evaluating soft tissue of a human joint which includes two or more bones and ligaments, wherein the ligaments are under anatomical tension to connect the bones together, creating a load-bearing articulating joint, the method includes: inserting into the joint a tensioner-balancer that includes a means of controlling a distraction force; providing an electronic receiving device; moving the joint through at least a portion of its range of motion; while moving the joint, controlling the distraction force, and collecting displacement and distraction load data of the bones; processing the collected data to produce a digital geometric model of the joint, wherein the model includes: ligament displacement data along a range of flexion angles and ligament load data along a range of flexion angles; and storing the digital geometric model for further use.
1. A method of evaluating soft tissue of a human knee joint which includes a femur bone, a tibia bone, a patella bone, and ligaments, wherein the ligaments are under anatomical tension to connect the bones together, creating a load-bearing articulating joint, the method comprising:
inserting into the knee joint a tensioner-balancer that includes: a base plate, a top plate that is configured to freely pivot about a pivot axis, a means of controlling a distraction force, and at least one sensor configured to measure a distraction force acting through the pivot axis and a distraction height of the top plate relative to the baseplate;
providing an electronic receiving device;
moving the knee joint through at least a portion of its range of motion;
while moving the knee joint, controlling the distraction force, and collecting displacement and distraction load data of the bones from the at least one sensor, using the electronic receiving device;
processing the collected data to produce a digital geometric model of the knee joint, wherein the model includes ligament displacement data along a range of flexion angles and ligament load data along a range of flexion angles; and
storing the digital geometric model for further use.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a graphical representation of at least one ligament of the knee joint, the graphical representation including:
ligament displacement along a range of flexion angles; and
ligament stress or force along a range of flexion angles.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the ligament displacement data and the ligament load data includes independent medial and lateral information.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
connecting at least one tracking marker to the knee joint;
collecting position data from the tracking marker while moving the knee joint;
while moving the knee joint, using the electronic receiving device to collect data from the at least one tracking device.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the information gathered to determine ligament physical characteristics that can be supplied as specific parameters for a software algorithm or machine learning system.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein
the patella remains in its native anatomical position during all steps of the method.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein:
the tensioner-balancer includes a tibial interface surface and an opposed femoral interface surface; and
the digital model further includes:
a medial spline representing a locus of points of contact of a medial condyle of the femur with the femoral interface surface, over a range of knee flexion angles; and
a lateral spline representing the locus of points of contact of the femur with the femoral interface surface over a range of knee flexion angles.
8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising using the tensioner-balancer to distract the knee joint with the patella in place.
9. The method of claim 7 , further comprising using the tensioner-balancer to distract the knee joint with a PCL of the knee joint intact.
10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the femoral interface surface is defined by the top plate, the top plate including a lateral cantilevered pad and a medial cantilevered pad, wherein each cantilevered pad is provided with two or more spaced-apart strain gages at the intersection between the respective cantilevered pad and a stationary portion of the top plate.
11. The method of claim 7 , wherein the tensioner-balancer includes a tibial interface surface is defined by the base plate, an opposed femoral interface surface defined by the top plate, and an array of femoral force sensors disposed on the femoral interface surface.
12. The method of claim 7 , further comprising performing a tibial plateau cut before inserting the tensioner-balancer.
13. The method of claim 7 , further comprising using a marking guide to indicate positions on the femur to make one or more cuts on the femur.
14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the marking guide is connected to the tensioner-balancer.
15. The method of claim 1 , further including:
defining a primary datum oriented and fixed in six degrees of freedom;
defining at least one secondary datum, each secondary datum having fixed origins relative to the primary datum;
associating continuous position and orientation of the at least one secondary datums with respect to the primary datum;
while moving the knee joint, using the electronic receiving device to collect data from at least one tracking device, wherein the tracking device data includes information describing the position and movement in six degrees of freedom of the at least one secondary datums;
incorporating the tracking device data into the digital geometric model.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein an initial datum is referenced relative to at least one of the bones before any cuts or resections have been made.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein a difference is computed between a geometric position data collected and a final defined desired set of geometric position data.
18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the computed difference is used to compute an desirable final best-fit position of an endoprosthesis with known geometry.
19. The method of claim 18 , wherein a desirable best-fit position of the endoprosthesis is based on procedural outcomes from population data collected over time.
20. The method of claim 15 , wherein the primary datum is positioned outside the joint, and each bone of the knee joint has a secondary datum associated therewith.
21. The method of claim 15 , wherein the primary datum is fixed relative to one of the bones.
22. The method of claim 15 , wherein an endoprosthesis is positioned relative to the bones of the knee joint from pre-operative measurement to assess joint kinematics.
23. The method of claim 15 , wherein the digital geometric model is used to develop a patient-specific operative procedure.
24. The method of claim 15 , wherein the digital geometric model is used to develop a patient-specific endoprosthesis.
25. The method of claim 15 , wherein the digital geometric model is used to develop a patient-specific augmentation or replacement or repair, of a ligament or a tendon.
26. The method of claim 15 , wherein a digital display is used to portray the evaluated knee joint.
27. The method of claim 15 , wherein the primary datum is established by physically registering landmarks on the tensioner-balancer.
28. The method of claim 15 , wherein the primary datum is established by physically registering bony landmarks on at least one of the bones.