IP Library Granted Patent US 12,580,640
Granted Patent B2
US 12,580,640 · App. 18/196,150 · Granted Mar 17, 2026

Ground system techniques to support flexible reconfigurable satellite payload operation

Inventors: Satyajit Roy (Gaithersburg, MD); Murali Regunathan (Germantown, MD); Rajeev Oza (Germantown, MD)
Assignee: Hughes Network Systems, LLC
H04B7/18519H04W72/0453H04W84/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,580,640
App. No.
18/196,150
Granted
Mar 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer-storage media, for ground system techniques to support flexible reconfigurable satellite payload operation. In some implementations, a satellite communication network is managed to operate in a first configuration. The satellite communication network includes a satellite having a payload that enables dynamic reconfiguration of carriers within a beam. A reconfiguration event is detected, and in response, a second configuration is determined for the satellite communication network. The second configuration differs from the first configuration in at least one of a set of carriers used for the beams or an assignment of the carriers to gateways. The satellite network is managed to operate in the second configuration, including at least one of (i) changing to a second set of carriers for the beams of the satellite or (ii) changing to a second assignment of the carriers to the gateways.

Claims (73)

1 . A method performed by one or more computers, the method comprising:

managing, by the one or more computers, a satellite communication network to operate in a first configuration, wherein the satellite communication network includes a satellite having a payload that enables dynamic reconfiguration of carriers within a beam, wherein the satellite communication network includes (i) multiple data centers or satellite network cores and (ii) multiple gateways, and wherein the first configuration includes a set of carriers for beams of the satellite and an assignment of the carriers to the gateways;

detecting, by the one or more computers, a reconfiguration event while the satellite communication network is operating in the first configuration;

in response to detecting the reconfiguration event, determining, by the one or more computers, a second configuration for the satellite communication network, wherein

the second configuration differs from the first configuration in at least one of a set of carriers used for the beams or an assignment of the carriers to the gateways; and

determining the second configuration comprises performing a dynamic outroute reconfiguration process that includes determining, for a forward link spectrum chunk:

a number of outroute carriers; and

a bandwidth for each of the outroute carriers; and

managing, by the one or more computers, the satellite communication network to operate in the second configuration, including at least one of (i) changing to a second set of carriers for the beams of the satellite or (ii) changing to a second assignment of the carriers to the gateways.

2 . The method of claim 1 , comprising associating each of the multiple gateways to each of the multiple data centers or satellite network cores to enable redundancy to permit assignment of a spectrum chunk among the multiple gateways.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting a change to remove at least a portion of a first gateway in the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by the first gateway to one or more second gateways in the satellite communication network.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting a change to add an additional gateway to the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by the gateways of the satellite communication network to the additional gateway.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting a change to a spectrum allocation for a beam or gateway of the satellite communication network; and

wherein, compared to the first configuration, the second configuration includes a change, for one or more of the carriers in a beam of the first configuration, to at least one of:

a number of carriers in the beam;

a bandwidth of one or more carriers in the beam;

a center frequency of one or more carriers in the beam; or

a symbol rate of one or more carriers in the beam.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting an unequal distribution of traffic or carriers among gateways of the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by a first gateway of the satellite communication network to one or more of the other gateways of the satellite communication network.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein managing the satellite communication network to operate in the second configuration comprises causing two or more of the gateways in the satellite communication network to serve different carriers of a same beam of the satellite.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a first group of the gateways are associated with a first data center or satellite network core (DC/SNC), and a second group of gateways are associated with a second DC/SNC; and

managing the satellite network to operate in the second configuration comprises transferring one or more carriers of a particular beam, wherein the one or more carriers are transferred from a particular gateway that is associated with the first DC/SNC to another gateway determined to be associated with the first DC/SNC, such that user traffic sessions are maintained after transferring the one or more carriers.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the dynamic outroute reconfiguration process further comprises determining, for the forward link spectrum chunk:

a symbol rate for each of the outroute carriers; and a center frequency for each of the outroute carriers.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the dynamic outroute reconfiguration process comprises:

determining the number of outroute carriers based on a bandwidth of the spectrum chunk, a measure of frequency roll-off, and a maximum symbol rate per outroute carrier; and

determining the symbol rates determined based on the bandwidth of the spectrum chunk, the measure of frequency roll-off, and the determined number of outroute carriers.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the dynamic outroute reconfiguration process comprises:

defining an outroute channel layout for the outroute carriers including (i) defining frequency characteristics for a first outroute carrier based on a boundary of the spectrum chunk, a symbol rate assigned for the first outroute carrier, and a measure of frequency roll-off, and (ii) after defining the frequency characteristics for the first outroute carrier, defining frequency characteristics for one or more additional outroute carriers based on a bandwidth of the first outroute carrier; and

assigning the outroute carriers to one or more of the gateways in the satellite communication network.

12 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the dynamic outroute reconfiguration process comprises determining an assignment of outroute carriers to modulators of the gateways and mapping the outroute carriers to corresponding hardware ports in the gateways.

13 . The method of claim 1 , determining the second configuration for the satellite communication network comprises performing a dynamic inroute reconfiguration process that comprises:

at least one of creating one or more inroute carriers, creating one or more inroute carrier groups, or adjusting one or more inroute carrier groups to add or remove an inroute carrier; and

assigning inroute carriers or inroute carrier groups to demodulators of the gateways and inroute group managers of the data centers or satellite network cores.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein performing the dynamic inroute reconfiguration process comprises at least one of:

creating one or more inroute carriers from a spectrum chunk assigned to one or more of the gateways in the satellite network;

changing an assignment of inroute carriers to inroute group managers;

redefining properties of one or more inroute carriers when moving an inroute carrier to a different inroute group manager or to a different demodulator;

spitting an inroute carrier into multiple inroute carriers; and

merging two or more inroute carriers into a single inroute carrier.

15 . A system comprising:

one or more computers; and

one or more computer-readable media storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

managing, by the one or more computers, a satellite communication network to operate in a first configuration, wherein the satellite communication network includes a satellite having a payload that enables dynamic reconfiguration of carriers within a beam, wherein the satellite communication network includes (i) multiple data centers or satellite network cores and (ii) multiple gateways, and wherein the first configuration includes a set of carriers for beams of the satellite and an assignment of the carriers to the gateways;

detecting, by the one or more computers, a reconfiguration event while the satellite communication network is operating in the first configuration;

in response to detecting the reconfiguration event, determining, by the one or more computers, a second configuration for the satellite communication network, wherein;

the second configuration differs from the first configuration in at least one of a set of carriers used for the beams or an assignment of the carriers to the gateways; and

determining the second configuration comprises performing an outroute reconfiguration process that includes determining, for a forward link spectrum chunk:

a number of outroute carriers; and

a bandwidth for each of the outroute carriers; and

managing, by the one or more computers, the satellite communication network to operate in the second configuration, including at least one of (i) changing to a second set of carriers for the beams of the satellite or (ii) changing to a second assignment of the carriers to the gateways.

16 . The system of claim 15 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting a change to remove at least a portion of a first gateway in the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by the first gateway to one or more second gateways in the satellite communication network.

17 . The system of claim 15 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting a change to add an additional gateway to the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by the gateways of the satellite communication network to the additional gateway.

18 . The system of claim 15 , wherein

compared to the first configuration, the second configuration includes a change, for one or more of the carriers in the beam of the first configuration, to at least one of:

a center frequency of one or more carriers in the beam; and

a symbol rate of one or more carriers in the beam.

19 . The system of claim 15 , wherein detecting the reconfiguration event comprises detecting an unequal distribution of traffic or carriers among gateways of the satellite communication network; and

wherein the second configuration includes a reassignment of one or more carriers served by a first gateway of the satellite communication network to one or more of the other gateways of the satellite communication network.

20 . One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that are operable, when executed by one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

managing, by the one or more computers, a satellite communication network to operate in a first configuration, wherein the satellite communication network includes a satellite having a payload that enables dynamic reconfiguration of carriers within a beam, wherein the satellite communication network includes (i) multiple data centers or satellite network cores and (ii) multiple gateways, and wherein the first configuration includes a set of carriers for beams of the satellite and an assignment of the carriers to the gateways;

detecting, by the one or more computers, a reconfiguration event while the satellite communication network is operating in the first configuration;

in response to detecting the reconfiguration event, determining, by the one or more computers, a second configuration for the satellite communication network, wherein:

the second configuration differs from the first configuration in at least one of a set of carriers used for the beams or an assignment of the carriers to the gateways; and

determining the second configuration comprises performing a dynamic outroute reconfiguration process that includes determining, for a forward link spectrum chunk:

a number of outroute carriers; and

a bandwidth of one or more carriers in the beam; and

managing, by the one or more computers, the satellite communication network to operate in the second configuration, including at least one of (i) changing to a second set of carriers for the beams of the satellite or (ii) changing to a second assignment of the carriers to the gateways.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2026
From: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
Reel/Frame 074656/0175 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2023
From: ROY, SATYAJIT; REGUNATHAN, MURALI; OZA, RAJEEV
To: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 065761/0626 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2023
From: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 064368/0450 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63340910 · May 11, 2022
Related Publication 20230370160A1 · Nov 16, 2023
References Cited (40)
US 7599686B2 · Quinn et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7958041B2 · Stanforth et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8144643B2 · Miller et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8818283B2 · McHenry et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9426666B2 · Ha et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9585150B2 · Marsh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9730227B2 · Marsh et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10004073B1 · Freedman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10104177B2 · Roy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10142998B2 · Roy · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10389775B2 · Roy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10601502B2 · Roy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10771147B2 · Regunathan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10784954B2 · Becker et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11031998B2 · Roy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11589315B2 · Roy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11711302B2 · Roy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20090161617A1 · Abedi · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20160072691A1 · Xu · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160195618A1 · Baer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180006892A1 · Xu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180097888A1 · Roy · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190132044A1 · Hreha et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190165856A1 · Roy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190245613A1 · Roy · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200059296A1 · Regunathan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200235778A1 · Merchlinsky · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200328804A1 · Xu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210044515A1 · Regunathan et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210058293A1 · Whitefield et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210160786A1 · Roy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220131600A1 · Regunathan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220209853A1 · Border et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230071786A1 · Regunathan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230188207A1 · Miller et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230224024A1 · Mendelsohn et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
DE 102013217564A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
idirect.net [online], “Overview of adaptive TDMA in an iDirect evolution network,” Mar. 2020, retrieved on Dec. 4, 2023, retireved from URL<https://www.idirect.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/TechBrief-AdaptiveTDMA.pdf>,… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2023/021909, mailed on Sep. 4, 2023, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Appln. No. PCT/US2023/021909, mailed on Nov. 21, 2024, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]