Granted Patent B1

US 12,260,769 · App. 18/203,340 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Inventors: Sean Patrick Suiter (Omaha, NE); Richard Andrew Kruse (Omaha, NE)

Assignee: Otto Aero Company

G08G5/55B64D45/08G08G5/21G08G5/30G08G5/34G08G5/54G08G5/58G08G5/76G08G5/26

Abstract

Claims (85)

1. An aircraft comprising:

a database operable to store information related to terrain;

an attitude sensor operable to detect an attitude of the aircraft;

a deviation monitor operable to assess at least one deviation in the attitude of the aircraft, wherein the deviation monitor is further operable to attempt to take corrective action where an assessed deviation has a magnitude outside of a preselected range, and wherein the corrective action is more insistent based on the magnitude of the deviation;

an emergency state monitor, wherein said emergency state monitor is operable to activate an emergency state if a user is unresponsive to one or more system alerts after the corrective action;

an alternate landing site selector, wherein after activation of an emergency state, said alternate landing site selector is operable to automatically:

create an alternate landing site (ALS) hierarchy by determining a suitability value for each of a plurality of alternate landing sites, wherein each assigned suitability value is based on weighting a plurality of factors related to that site's suitability for landing;

select an alternate landing site from the ALS hierarchy based on the determined suitability values;

create a route from a current position of the aircraft to an approach fix associated with the selected alternate landing site, the route accounting for at least terrain and obstacles;

cause the autopilot to instruct the aircraft to traverse the route;

and

cause the aircraft to land at the selected alternate landing site.

2. The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the emergency state monitor is operable to instruct the autopilot to descend the aircraft to a lower altitude in the event of a pressurization failure and wherein the emergency state monitor is further operable to subsequently activate an emergency state after a user is unresponsive to one or more system alerts.

3. The aircraft of claim 2 , wherein said calculated suitability values are based on at least a distance of the aircraft from the alternate landing site, runway length, terrain, or weather conditions.

4. The aircraft of claim 3 , further comprising:

a transponder;

and

wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to, after an emergency state is activated, automatically cause at least one of the aircraft to transmit a message communicating an intent to land at the selected alternate landing site or the transponder to squawk emergency.

5. The aircraft of claim 4 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further capable of automatically monitoring for weather disturbances along the route and adjusting the route in response to one or more detected weather disturbances.

6. The aircraft of claim 5 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to evaluate wind conditions associated with the selected alternate landing site and wherein the approach fix is selected to permit the aircraft to land into headwinds.

7. An aircraft comprising:

( a ) an autopilot;

(b) a database operable to store information related to terrain;

(c) a deviation monitor operable to assess at least one deviation in the attitude of the aircraft, wherein the deviation monitor is further operable to attempt to take corrective action where the assessed deviation has a magnitude outside of a preselected range, and wherein the corrective action is more insistent based on the magnitude of the deviation;

(d) an emergency state monitor, wherein said emergency state monitor is operable to activate an emergency state if a user is unresponsive after the corrective action;

(e) an alternate landing site selector, wherein after activation of an emergency state, said alternate landing site selector is operable to automatically:

(1) create an alternate landing site (ALS) hierarchy by determining a suitability value for each of a plurality of alternate landing sites, wherein each assigned suitability value is based on weighting a plurality of factors related to that site's suitability for landing;

(2) select an alternate landing site from the ALS hierarchy based on the determined suitability values;

(3) create a route from a current position of the aircraft to a position associated with the selected alternate landing site, the route accounting for at least terrain or weather;

and

(4) cause the autopilot to direct the aircraft to traverse the route.

8. The aircraft of claim 7 , wherein said determined suitability values are based on at least a distance of the aircraft to the corresponding alternate landing site, terrain, and weather conditions.

9. The aircraft of claim 8 , wherein the emergency state monitor is operable to instruct the autopilot to descend the aircraft to a lower altitude in the event of a pressurization failure and wherein the emergency state monitor is further operable to subsequently activate an emergency state after a user is unresponsive.

10. The aircraft of claim 9 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to evaluate wind conditions associated with the selected alternate landing site and wherein the position associated with the selected alternate landing site is selected to permit the aircraft to land into headwinds.

11. The aircraft of claim 10 , further comprising:

a transponder;

and

wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to, after an emergency state is activated, automatically cause the aircraft to transmit a message communicating an intent to land at the selected alternate landing site and the transponder to squawk emergency.

12. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the alternate landing side selector is further capable of automatically monitoring for weather disturbances along the route and adjusting the route in response to one or more detected weather disturbances.

13. The aircraft of claim 12 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to evaluate wind conditions associated with the selected alternate landing site and wherein the approach fix is selected to permit the aircraft to land into headwinds.

14. The aircraft of claim 7 , further comprising:

(e) a housing;

(f) an avionics data bus connection on said housing for connection to at least one aircraft database;

(g) at least one receiver operable to receive flight operation information updates from a base station, said flight operation information selected from the group including at least one of: (1) topographic information, (2) airport information including navigation/communication frequencies, (3) flight plan information, or (4) aircraft information;

(h) at least one datalink for receiving flight data updates from at least one of an onboard device, portable device, or a surface-based device;

(i) at least one of a memory or an external memory connected to said aircraft datalink via said avionics data bus connection for storing said flight operation information and flight data to said avionics; and

(j) at least one processor programmed to receive updated flight operation information or flight data from at least one of said base station, onboard device, portable device, or surface-based device on said avionics data bus connection.

15. An emergency assistant comprising:

a deviation monitor operable to assess at least one deviation in the attitude of an aircraft, wherein the deviation monitor is further operable to attempt to take corrective action where the assessed deviation has a magnitude outside of a preselected range, and wherein the corrective action is more insistent based on the magnitude of the deviation;

an emergency state monitor, wherein said emergency state monitor is operable to activate an emergency state if a user is unresponsive after the corrective action;

an alternate landing site selector, wherein after activation of an emergency state, said alternate landing site selector is operable to automatically:

create an alternate landing site (ALS) hierarchy by determining a suitability value for each of a plurality of alternate landing sites, wherein each assigned suitability value is based on weighting a plurality of factors related to that site's suitability for landing;

select an alternate landing site from the ALS hierarchy based on the determined suitability values;

create a route from a current position of the aircraft to a position associated with the selected alternate landing site, the route accounting for at least terrain and weather;

and

cause an autopilot to direct the aircraft to traverse the route.

16. The emergency assistant of claim 15 , wherein the emergency state monitor is operable to instruct the autopilot to descend the aircraft to a lower altitude in the event of a pressurization failure and wherein the emergency state monitor is further operable to subsequently activate an emergency state after a user is unresponsive.

17. The emergency assistant of claim 16 , wherein said determined suitability values are based on at least the aircraft's distance to the alternate landing site, terrain, and weather conditions.

18. The emergency assistant of claim 17 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to evaluate wind conditions associated with the selected alternate landing site and wherein the position associated with the selected alternate landing site is selected to permit the aircraft to land into headwinds.

19. The emergency assistant of claim 18 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to, after an emergency state is activated, automatically cause at least one of (1) the aircraft to transmit a message communicating an intent to land at the selected alternate landing or (2) a transponder to squawk emergency.

20. The emergency assistant of claim 19 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further capable of automatically monitoring for weather disturbances along the route and adjusting the route in response to one or more detected weather disturbances.

21. An emergency assistant comprising:

( a ) an emergency state monitor, wherein said emergency state monitor is operable to activate an emergency state;

(b) a deviation monitor operable to assess at least one deviation in an attitude of an aircraft, wherein the deviation monitor is further operable to take corrective action where the assessed deviation has a magnitude outside of a preselected range, and wherein the corrective action includes at least one of correcting the deviation or activating an emergency state, and wherein the corrective action is more insistent based on the magnitude of the deviation;

and

wherein the emergency state monitor is operable to automatically activate the emergency state at least partially in response to the corrective action if a user is unresponsive to one or more system alerts associated with the corrective action;

(c) an alternate landing site selector operable to:

(1) create an alternate landing site (ALS) hierarchy by determining a suitability value for each of a plurality of alternate landing sites, wherein each assigned suitability value is based on weighting a plurality of factors related to the site's suitability for landing;

(2) select an alternate landing site from the ALS hierarchy based on the determined suitability values;

(3) create a route from a current position of the aircraft to a position associated with the selected alternate landing site, the route accounting for at least terrain and weather;

and

(4) direct an autopilot, upon selection of an emergency state to instruct the aircraft to traverse the route to said position associated with the selected alternate landing site.

22. The emergency assistant of claim 21 , wherein said deviation monitor further comprises a notification selected from the group including a voice message, display, audio tone or haptic notification when an assessed deviation has a magnitude outside of said preselected range.

23. The emergency assistant of claim 22 , wherein said display displays an effective range of the aircraft, at least one of the size or shape of said effective range determined by at least one of altitude or wind.

24. The emergency assistant of claim 21 , wherein said route from a current position of the aircraft to a position associated with the selected alternate landing site is based on aircraft thrust, wherein the aircraft thrust is at least one of zero thrust or partial thrust.

25. The emergency assistant of claim 24 , wherein said deviation monitor causes the display to display the route and at least two of vertical (yaw), lateral (pitch), or longitudinal (roll) axes of the aircraft.

26. The emergency assistant of claim 24 , wherein said alternate landing site selector continues to determine a suitability of at least the selected alternate landing site based at least on the aircraft thrust and current position relative to a published altitude at the selected alternate landing site.

27. The emergency assistant of claim 23 , wherein said display includes an estimated time of arrival of the aircraft to a position associated with the selected alternate landing site.

28. The emergency assistant of claim 21 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to evaluate wind conditions associated with the selected alternate landing site and wherein the position associated with the selected alternate landing site is selected to permit the aircraft to land into headwinds.

29. The emergency assistant of claim 21 , wherein the alternate landing site selector is further operable to, after an emergency state is activated, automatically cause the aircraft to 1) transmit a message communicating at least one of an intent to divert or 2) cause a transponder to squawk emergency.

30. The emergency assistant of claim 23 , further comprising:

a database operable to store at least one of 1) information located in the aircraft's Pilot Operating Handbook or 2) information related to pilot currency, wherein the database is further adapted to store a dataset specific to a pilot, the dataset further including a preflight assessment taking into consideration the pilot's proficiency in determining the suitability of the selected alternate landing site;

at least one sensor adapted to collect at least one of aircraft position data or aircraft configuration data;

and

a configuration evaluator adapted to determine if a particular aircraft configuration pattern corresponds to an expected configuration of the aircraft based on a current flight segment of the aircraft.

Assignments (3)

Continuity (18)

References Cited (180)

Cited By (1)

US 12,704,847