Three-dimensional objects and their formation
The present disclosure provides three-dimensional (3D) methods, apparatuses, software (e.g., non-transitory computer readable medium), and systems for the formation of at least one desired 3D object; comprising use of a geometric model, a physics based model, one or more markers, one or more modes, or any combination thereof. The disclosure provides reduction of deformation that may be caused by the forming process of the 3D object.
1. An apparatus for printing a three-dimensional (3D) object, the apparatus comprising at least one controller configured to:
(a) couple to a power source and operatively couple to a 3D printer;
(b) direct the 3D printer to print a test object using a first set of printing instructions generated at least in part by employing a simulation of a physics model simulating the printing of the 3D object by the 3D printer, the physics model employing a first mode estimating alteration in the 3D object printed as a result of the printing, the first mode being of a plurality of modes, each of the plurality of modes representing a plausible alteration of the 3D object (A) during the printing and/or (B) as a result of the printing, the physics model further employing (I) a geometric model of the 3D object and (II) a material property of the 3D object;
(c) compare, or direct comparison, between (i) a simulated test object generated at least in part by using the physics model and (ii) an image of the test object printed using the printing instructions, to generate a comparison;
(d) use, or direct use of, the comparison to adjust the physics model at least in part by choosing a second mode of the plurality of modes that best fits the test object printed, to generate an adjusted physics model; and
(e) direct the 3D printer to print the 3D object using a second set of printing instructions generated at least in part by employing the adjusted physics model.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct iteratively repeating (b), (c), (d) and (e), until one or more dimensions of the test object corresponds to an acceptable dimensional accuracy range relating to a requested 3D object.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the test object comprises markers, wherein the at least one controller is configured to (i) operatively couple with at least one sensor, (ii) direct the at least one sensor to sense one or more physical markers and generate sensing data, and (iii) use, or direct usage of, the sensing data to choose the second mode that best fits the test object printed.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to, during the printing, (ii) direct the at least one sensor to sense one or more physical markers and generate sensing data, and (iii) use, or direct usage of, the sensing data to choose the second mode that best fits the test object printed.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to use, or directing use of, the comparison to adjust the physics model at least in part by employing the first mode corresponding to a predicted deformation mode of the 3D object.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to use, or directing use of, the comparison to adjust the physics model at least in part by employing the first mode corresponding to a predicted elastic deformation mode of the 3D object.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to use, or directing use of, the comparison to adjust the physics model at least in part by using a computational learning scheme.
8. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to use, or directing use of, the comparison to adjust the physics model at least in part by using a computational learning scheme comprising an inelastic response manifested in the 3D object.
9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to print the 3D object such that the 3D object deviates from a requested 3D object by (a) at most 100 micrometers and (b) a fundamental length scale of the 3D object divided by 2500.
10. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to adjust, or direct adjustment, of the physics model iteratively.
11. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to repeat (a), (b) and (c) iteratively.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to repeat (a), (b) and (c) iteratively until one or more dimensions of the test object corresponds to an acceptable dimensional accuracy range relating to the 3D object requested, the acceptable dimensional accuracy range being according to (i) an intended purpose of the 3D object and/or (ii) an industrial standard.
13. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to print the test object using a first set of printing instructions generated at least in part by employing the physics model comprising (a) a thermo-mechanical analysis, (b) the material property of the 3D object, and (c) at least one characteristic of an energy beam used for the printing.
14. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to print the test object using a first set of printing instructions generated at least in part by employing the physics model comprising continuum mechanics.
15. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to (a) print the test object from a powder bed and (b) print the 3D object from the powder bed.
16. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to (a) print the test object using an energy beam and (b) print the 3D object using the energy beam.
17. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to (a) print the test object from a material and (b) print the 3D object from the material comprising elemental metal, metal alloy, ceramic, or an allotrope of elemental carbon.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to direct the 3D printer to (a) print the test object at an atmosphere and (b) print the 3D object at the atmosphere comprising (i) oxygen or (ii) water vapor.
19. Non-transitory computer readable program instructions that, when read by one or more processors operatively coupled to the 3D printer configured for the printing, cause the one or more processors to execute one or more operations comprising executing the printing to print the 3D object of claim 1 , the program instructions being stored on at least one non-transitory computer readable medium.
20. A method of printing the 3D object, the method comprising (a) providing the apparatus of claim 1 , and (b) using the apparatus to print the 3D object.