IP Library Granted Patent US 12,219,211
Granted Patent B2
US 12,219,211 · App. 18/240,195 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Classifying parental rating for better viewing experience

Inventors: Rohit Dhiman (Uttarakhand, IN); Ashish Gupta (Karnataka, IN); Vaibhav Gupta (Karnataka, IN); Senthil Kumar Karuppasamy (Bangalore, IN); Anil Kumar (Haryana, IN)
Assignee: Adeia Guides Inc.
H04N21/4542G06F16/45G06F16/48G06N20/00G06V20/41H04N21/4532H04N21/4662
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,219,211
App. No.
18/240,195
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to limiting viewing of media content. More particularly, the present invention relates to classifying segments of content for limited viewing based on user preferences and classifications. According to a first aspect, there is provided a method for parental control of media content for a media guidance application, the method comprising, determining user preferences comprising settings for restricting viewing of segments of media content, determining media content for user consumption on a user device, determining a classification of each of a plurality of segments of the media content using a content analyzer and classifier, and comparing the determined classifications against the user preferences. In response to the comparing, the method further comprises the steps of, determining an action associated with the determined classification for restricting viewing of one or more of the plurality of segments of the media asset and modifying the one or more of the plurality of segments based on the determined action.

Claims (26)

1. A method comprising:

receiving audience sensibility data comprising, for each of a plurality of aspects of impropriety of media content, an acceptable degree of impropriety;

receiving, for each of a plurality of sections of a media item, content impropriety data comprising a classification of the section in respect of each of the plurality of aspects of impropriety of the content in the section;

comparing, for a first section of the media item, the classification of the content in the first section in respect of at least one aspect of impropriety found in the content impropriety data against the acceptable degree of impropriety in relation to that aspect of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data;

in response to the comparison finding that a degree of impropriety of the content in the first section is greater than the acceptable degree of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data for the at least one aspect of impropriety of the content, modifying a presentation of the first section of the media item to accord with the acceptable degree of impropriety for that aspect of impropriety;

comparing, for a second section of the media item different from the first section, the classification of the content in the second section in respect of the at least one aspect of impropriety found in the content impropriety data against the acceptable degree of impropriety in relation to that aspect of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data;

in response to the comparison finding that a degree of impropriety of the content in the second section is less than or equal to the acceptable degree of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data for each aspect of impropriety of the content, generating the second section for display without the modification applied to the presentation of the first section of the media item.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the audience sensibility data is included in a user profile.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating audience sensibility data by monitoring how a user interacts with a media presentation device in reaction to the presentation by the media presentation device of a section of a media item classification having a known degree of impropriety in relation to a given aspect of impropriety.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the content impropriety data further comprises a confidence level of the classification of each of the plurality of sections.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the modification of the presentation of the section of the media item comprises any one of: fast forward through the section; blur the section; skip the section; mute audio for the section.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating for presentation an indication of the classification of the section which triggered the modification of the section.

7. A system for parental control of presentation of a media item, the system comprising:

memory storing instructions; and

control circuitry configured to execute the instructions to:

receive audience sensibility data comprising, for each of a plurality of aspects of impropriety of media content, an acceptable degree of impropriety;

receive, for each of a plurality of sections of the media item, content impropriety data comprising a classification of the section in respect of each of the plurality of aspects of impropriety of the content in the section;

compare, for a first section of the media item, the classification of the content in the first section in respect of at least one aspect of impropriety found in the content impropriety data against the acceptable degree of impropriety in relation to that aspect of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data;

in response to the comparison finding that a degree of impropriety of the content in the first section is greater than the acceptable degree of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data for the at least one aspect of impropriety of the content, modify a presentation of the first section of the media item to accord with the acceptable degree of impropriety for that aspect of impropriety;

compare, for a second section of the media item different from the first section, the classification of the content in the second section in respect of the at least one aspect of impropriety found in the content impropriety data against the acceptable degree of impropriety in relation to that aspect of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data;

in response to the comparison finding that a degree of impropriety of the content in the second section is less than or equal to the acceptable degree of impropriety found in the audience sensibility data for each aspect of impropriety of the content, generate the second section for display without the modification applied to the presentation of the first section of the media item.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the audience sensibility data is included in a user profile.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to generate audience sensibility data by monitoring how a user interacts with a media presentation device in reaction to the presentation by the media presentation device of a section of a media item classification having a known degree of impropriety in relation to a given aspect of impropriety.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the content impropriety data further comprises a confidence level of the classification of each of the plurality of sections.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the modification of the presentation of the section of the media item comprises any one of: fast forward through the section; blur the section; skip the section; mute audio for the section.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein the control circuitry is further configured to generate for presentation an indication of the classification of the section which triggered the modification of the section.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 8, 2025
From: DHIMAN, ROHIT; GUPTA, ASHISH; GUPTA, VAIBHAV; KARUPPASAMY, SENTHIL KUMAR; KUMAR, ANIL
To: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 069785/0357 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 8, 2025
From: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
To: ADEIA GUIDES INC.
Reel/Frame 069849/0703 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 4, 2024
From: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
To: ADEIA GUIDES INC.
Reel/Frame 069113/0323 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2023
From: DHIMAN, ROHIT; GUPTA, ASHISH; GUPTA, VAIBHAV; KARUPPASAMY, SENTHIL KUMAR; KUMAR, ANIL
To: ROVI GUIDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 064758/0049 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17216213 · Mar 29, 2021
Related Publication 20230412882A1 · Dec 21, 2023
References Cited (5)
US 7761892B2 · Ellis et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20200097731A1 · Gupta et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200145723A1 · Vaughn et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220312075A1 · Dhiman et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/107,445, filed Nov. 30, 2020. [cited by applicant]