Compacted table data files validation

1. A method for database replay log compaction verification, comprising:

replaying a first replay log to generate a rut replay result, wherein replaying the first replay log comprises:

determining that a first field is not utilized as a condition in at least one database command included in the first replay log, and

in response to determining that the first field is not utilized as a condition in the at least one database command included in the first replay log, replacing, in the first replay result, a rust value of the first field included in a first database command in the rust replay log with a first hash value;

replaying a second replay log to generate a second replay result; and

comparing the rust replay result and the second replay result to verify that the first replay log and the second replay log are equivalent.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein replaying the second replay log comprises:

replacing a second value of a second field included in a second database command of the second replay log with a second hash value.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprises:

replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition database commands included in the first replay log.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprises:

replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition in database commands included in the second replay log.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the rust replay result and the second replay result comprises:

comparing a third hash value of a row of the rust replay result to a fourth hash value of a corresponding row of the second replay result.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

responsive to a non-match between the third hash value and the fourth hash value, transmitting a notification of the non-match.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein transmitting the notification of the non-match includes logging the non-match to a log file.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second replay log is a compacted version of the rust replay log that has been generated using a compaction process.

9. A device, comprising:

a memory; and

a processor, the processor configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to:

determine that a first field it not utilized as a condition in at least one database command included in a first replay log;

in response to determining that the first field is not utilized as a condition in the at least one database command included in the to replay log, replace, in a rut replay result, a rut value of the first field included in a first database command in a first replay log with a first hash value;

replay a second replay log to generate a second replay result; and

compare the first replay result and the second replay result to verify that the rust replay log and the second replay log are equivalent.

10. The device of claim 9 , wherein the instructions to replay the second replay log comprise to:

replace a second value of a second field included in a second database command of the second replay log with a second hash value.

11. The device of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to replace the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprise to:

replace the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition in database commands included in the first replay log.

12. The device of claim 10 , wherein the instructions to replace the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprise to:

replace the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition in database commands included in the second replay log.

13. The device of claim 9 , wherein the instructions to compare the first replay result and the second replay result comprise to:

compare a third hash value of a row of the first replay result to a fourth hash value of a corresponding row of the second replay result.

14. The device of claim 13 , therein the processor is further configured to execute instructions stored in the memory to:

responsive to a non-match between the third hash value and the fourth hash value, transmit a notification of the non-match.

15. The device of claim 14 , wherein to transmit the notification of the non-match includes to log the non-match to a log file.

16. The device of claim 9 , wherein the second replay log is a compacted version of the rust replay log that has been generated using a compaction process.

17. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions operable to cause one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

determining that a first field is not utilized as a condition in at least one database command included in a first replay log;

in response to determining that the fight field is not unitized as a condition in the at least one database command included in the first replay log, replacing, in a first replay result, a first value of the first field included in a first database command in the first replay log with a first hash value;

replaying a second replay log to generate a second replay result; and

comparing the rust replay result and the second replay result to verify that the first replay log and the second replay log are equivalent.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein replaying the second replay log comprises:

replacing a second value of a second field included in a second database command of the second replay log with a second hash value.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 , wherein replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprises:

replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition in database commands included in the first replay log.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 , wherein replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value comprises:

replacing the second value of the second field included in the second database command of the second replay log with the second hash value responsive to a determination that the second field is not utilized as a condition in database commands included in the second replay log.