IP Library Granted Patent US 12,267,140
Granted Patent B2
US 12,267,140 · App. 18/311,353 · Granted Apr 1, 2025

Optimizing scanning beam penetration

Inventors: Mohammad Khojastepour (Lawrenceville, NJ); Nariman Torkzaban (College Park, MD)
Assignee: NEC Corporation
H04B7/06958H04B7/0447H04B7/0495H04B7/0639
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,267,140
App. No.
18/311,353
Granted
Apr 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Beamforming methods and systems include determining a tradeoff curve between scanning beamwidth and transmission beamwidth based on a channel distribution for a base station. A set of scanning beams is selected based on the tradeoff curve. Devices around the base station are scanned for using the set of scanning beams. A set of transmission beams is selected for communications with the devices based on information received during the scanning. The set of transmission beams are used for transmission with a beamforming transmitter.

Claims (36)

1. A beamforming method, comprising:

determining a tradeoff curve between scanning beamwidth and transmission beamwidth based on a channel distribution for a base station with a recursive process that stops responsive to reaching a level of recursion where a number of tested beam patterns equals 2b 2 +b, where b is a number of scanning time slots;

selecting a set of scanning beams based on the tradeoff curve;

scanning for devices around the base station using the set of scanning beams;

selecting a set of transmission beams for communications with the devices based on information received during the scanning; and

transmitting using the set of transmission beams with a beamforming transmitter.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the tradeoff curve includes determining an initial tradeoff curve based on a uniform channel distribution.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an updated tradeoff curve based on a new channel distribution that accounts for the information received during the scanning.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising repeating the selection of the set of scanning beams, the scanning, the selection of the set of transmission beams, and the communicating based on the updated tradeoff curve.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the new channel distribution is selected from the group consisting of a piecewise uniform distribution and cut-normal distribution.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of scanning beams includes a tulip design, such that each scanning beam overlaps with two neighboring scanning beams.

7. A beamforming control, comprising:

a hardware processor; and

a memory that stores a computer program which, when executed by the hardware processor, causes the hardware processor to:

determine a tradeoff curve between scanning beamwidth and transmission beamwidth based on a channel distribution for a base station with a recursive process that stops responsive to reaching a level of recursion where a number of tested beam patterns equals 2b{circumflex over ( )}2+b, where b is a number of scanning time slots;

select a set of scanning beams based on the tradeoff curve;

scan for devices around the base station using the set of scanning beams; and

select a set of transmission beams for communications with the devices based on information received during the scan.

8. The beamforming control of claim 7 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to determine an initial tradeoff curve based on a uniform channel distribution.

9. The beamforming control of claim 7 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to determine an updated tradeoff curve based on a new channel distribution that accounts for the information received during the scanning.

10. The beamforming control of claim 9 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to repeat the selection of the set of scanning beams, the scan, and the selection of the set of transmission beams based on the updated tradeoff curve.

11. The beamforming control of claim 9 , wherein the new channel distribution is selected from the group consisting of a piecewise uniform distribution and cut-normal distribution.

12. The beamforming control of claim 7 , wherein the set of scanning beams includes a tulip design, such that each scanning beam overlaps with two neighboring scanning beams.

13. A transceiver, comprising:

a phased array antenna comprising a plurality of antenna elements;

a hardware processor; and

a memory that stores a computer program which, when executed by the hardware processor, causes the hardware processor to:

determine a tradeoff curve between scanning beamwidth and transmission beamwidth based on a channel distribution for a base station with a recursive process that stops responsive to reaching a level of recursion where a number of tested beam patterns equals 2b{circumflex over ( )}2+b, where b is a number of scanning time slots;

select a set of scanning beams based on the tradeoff curve;

scan for devices around the base station using the set of scanning beams;

select a set of transmission beams for communications with the devices based on information received during the scan; and

transmit using the set of transmission beams with the phased array antenna.

14. The transceiver of claim 13 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to determine an initial tradeoff curve based on a uniform channel distribution.

15. The transceiver of claim 13 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to determine an updated tradeoff curve based on a new channel distribution that accounts for the information received during the scanning.

16. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the computer program further causes the hardware processor to repeat the selection of the set of scanning beams, the scan, and the selection of the set of transmission beams based on the updated tradeoff curve.

17. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the new channel distribution is selected from the group consisting of a piecewise uniform distribution and cut-normal distribution.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 27, 2025
From: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
To: NEC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070345/0687 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 4, 2023
From: KHOJASTEPOUR, MOHAMMAD; TORKZABAN, NARIMAN
To: NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 063529/0417 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63339038 · May 6, 2022
Related Publication 20230361849A1 · Nov 9, 2023
References Cited (17)
US 11069985B1 · Noah · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20120166140A1 · Weber · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140222653A1 · Takayasu · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160344443A1 · Vijayasankar · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200186272A1 · Athley · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Khojastepour et al., “Multi-user Beam Alignment for Millimeter Wave Systems in Multi-path Environments”, In 2020 54th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE, Nov. 1, 2020, pp. 549-553. [cited by applicant]
Busari et al, “5g millimeterwave mobile broadband: Performance and challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, No. 6, Jun. 2018, pp. 137-143. [cited by applicant]
Kutty et al., “Beamforming for millimeter wave communications: An inclusive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 18, No. 2, Dec. 2015, pp. 949-973. [cited by applicant]
Akdeniz et al, “Millimeter wave channel modeling and cellular capacity evaluation,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 32, No. 6, Jun. 2014, pp. 1164-1179. [cited by applicant]
Nitsche et al., “Steering with eyes closed: Mm-wave beam steering without in-band measurement,” in 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Apr. 2015, pp. 2416-2424. [cited by applicant]
Shahsavari et al., “Robust beam tracking and data communication in millimeter wave mobile networks,” in 2019 International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOPT), Jun. 20… [cited by applicant]
Barati et al., “Initial access in millimeter wave cellular systems,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 15, No. 12, Sep. 2016, pp. 7926-7940. [cited by applicant]
Giordani et al., “Comparative analysis of initial access techniques in 5g mmwave cellular networks,” in 2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS), Apr. 2016, pp. 268-273. [cited by applicant]
Desai et al., “Initial beamforming for mmwave communications,” in 2014 48th Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, Nov. 2014, pp. 1926-1930. [cited by applicant]
Hussain et al., “Throughput optimal beam alignment in millimeter wave networks,” in 2017 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), Feb. 2017, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Noh et al., “Multi-resolution codebook and adaptive beamforming sequence design for millimeter wave beam alignment,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 16, No. 9, Feb. 2018, pp. 5689-5701. [cited by applicant]
Torkzaban et al., “Multi-user beam alignment in presence of multi-path,” arXiv:2202.06452v1 [cs.IT] Feb. 14, 2022, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]