Maximum-likelihood decoding of quantum codes
View Patent ↗Techniques regarding quantum error correction are provided. For example, one or more embodiments described herein can comprise a system, which can comprise a memory that can store computer executable components. The system can also comprise a processor, operably coupled to the memory, and that can execute the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components can comprise a maximum-likelihood decoder component that executes a maximum-likelihood decoding algorithm to determine an error correction based on a decoding hypergraph that characterizes error-sensitive events associated with a quantum error-correcting code executed on a quantum circuit.
1. A system, comprising:
a memory that stores computer executable components; and
a processor, operably coupled to the memory, and that executes at least one of the computer executable components that:
executes, using a quantum processor comprising qubits, a quantum error-correcting code on a quantum circuit;
generates a decoding hypergraph by mapping error-sensitive events associated with quantum measurements from the executing of the quantum error-correcting code on the quantum circuit to Pauli faults of the quantum circuit, wherein the decoding hypergraph comprises:
nodes respectively corresponding to the error-sensitive events, and
hyperedges, wherein each hyperedge connects a respective subset of the nodes respectively representing error-sensitive events associated with a respective Pauli fault of the Pauli faults, and wherein each hyperedge associated with the respective Pauli fault is generated by tracing the respective Pauli fault through the quantum circuit to determine a respective subset of error-sensitive events that are triggered by the respective Pauli fault; and
determines, based on the decoding hypergraph, at least one error correction for at least one of the error-sensitive events.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:
assigns probability values to the hyperedges and generates a probability distribution based on the probability values.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:
identifies the error-sensitive events by performing a Gottesman-Knill simulation of the quantum circuit.
4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:
identifies the error-sensitive events by employing flag qubits associated with second errors originating from first errors, wherein a second error is weighted higher than a first error from which the second error originated.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the error-sensitive events comprise linear combinations of syndrome measurement bits that would equate to zero in an ideal quantum circuit operation.
6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the tracing employs a Pauli depolarizing noise model.
7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the tracing employs a Gottesman-Knill simulation.
8. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
executing, by a system operatively coupled to a processor, using a quantum processor comprising qubits, a quantum error-correcting code on a quantum circuit;
generating, by the system, a decoding hypergraph by mapping error-sensitive events associated with quantum measurements from the executing of the quantum error-correcting code on the quantum circuit to Pauli faults of the quantum circuit, wherein the decoding hypergraph comprises:
nodes respectively corresponding to the error-sensitive events, and
hyperedges, wherein each hyperedge connects a respective subset of the nodes respectively representing error-sensitive events associated with a respective Pauli fault of the Pauli faults, and wherein each hyperedge associated with the respective Pauli fault is generated by tracing the respective Pauli fault through the quantum circuit to determine a respective subset of error-sensitive events that are triggered by the respective Pauli fault; and
determining, based on the decoding hypergraph, at least one error correction for at least one of the error-sensitive events.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:
assigning, by the system, probability values to the hyperedges; and
generating, by the system, a probability distribution based on the probability values.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:
identifying, by the system, the error-sensitive events by performing a Gottesman-Knill simulation of the quantum circuit.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:
identifying, by the system, the error-sensitive events by employing flag qubits associated with second errors originating from first errors, wherein a second error is weighted higher than a first error from which the second error originated.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the error-sensitive events comprise linear combinations of syndrome measurement bits that would equate to zero in an ideal quantum circuit operation.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the tracing employs a Pauli depolarizing noise model.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the tracing employs a Gottesman-Knill simulation.
15. A computer program product for quantum error correction, the computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable by a processor to cause the processor to:
execute, using a quantum processor comprising qubits, a quantum error-correcting code on a quantum circuit;
generate a decoding hypergraph by mapping error-sensitive events associated with quantum measurements from the executing of the quantum error-correcting code on the quantum circuit to Pauli faults of the quantum circuit, wherein the decoding hypergraph comprises:
nodes respectively corresponding to the error-sensitive events, and
hyperedges, wherein each hyperedge connects a respective subset of the nodes respectively representing error-sensitive events associated with a respective Pauli fault of the Pauli faults, and wherein each hyperedge associated with the respective Pauli fault is generated by tracing the respective Pauli fault through the quantum circuit to determine a respective subset of error-sensitive events that are triggered by the respective Pauli fault; and
determining, based on the decoding hypergraph, at least one error correction for at least one of the error-sensitive events.
16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further cause the processor to:
assign probability values to the hyperedges; and
generate a probability distribution based on the probability values.
17. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further cause the processor to:
identify the error-sensitive events by performing a Gottesman-Knill simulation of the quantum circuit.
18. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further cause the processor to:
identify the error-sensitive events by employing flag qubits associated with second errors originating from first errors, wherein a second error is weighted higher than a first error from which the second error originated.
19. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the error-sensitive events comprise linear combinations of syndrome measurement bits that would equate to zero in an ideal quantum circuit operation.
20. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the tracing employs a Pauli depolarizing noise model.