IP Library Granted Patent US 12,547,147
Granted Patent B2
US 12,547,147 · App. 18/336,942 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Generating optimized tool paths and machine commands for beam cutting tools

Inventors: Axel H. Henning (Black Diamond, WA); James M. O'Connor (Bellevue, WA); Carl Olsen (Vashon, WA)
Assignee: Hypertherm, Inc.
G05B19/4097B24C1/045F16M11/08F16M11/18F16M11/2057F16M13/02G03B15/006G05B19/4145G06F30/20G05B2219/45036Y02P90/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,547,147
App. No.
18/336,942
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A facility for automated modelling of the cutting process for a particular material to be cut by a beam cutting tool, such as a waterjet cutting system, from empirical data to predict aspects of the waterjet's effect on the workpiece across a range of material thicknesses, across a range of cutting geometries, and across a range of cutting quality levels, all of which may be broader than, and independent of the actual requirements for a target workpiece, is described.

Claims (63)

1 . A method in a computing system for performing a plasma or laser cutting project using a plasma or laser cutting system, the method comprising:

during a single, uninterrupted performance of the plasma or laser cutting project, wherein the plasma or laser cutting project includes at least: (1)

a first cutting model with one or more first machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a first routed geometry, and

(2) a second cutting model with one or more second machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a second routed geometry:

(a) causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry; and

(b) after (a), causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

2 . The method of claim 1 wherein (1) and (2) comprises applying a one or more cutting models to obtain a tool path, and interpolating the tool path to obtain machine commands.

3 . The method of claim 1 wherein the plasma or laser cutting system executes the one or more second machine commands to perform a subsequent cutting streak of the second routed geometry immediately after the plasma or laser cutting system's execution of the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry.

4 . The method of claim 1 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying the same cutting model.

5 . The method of claim 1 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying different cutting models, the method further comprising:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, applying a correction transformation to an output of the second cutting model to obtain transformed output,

and wherein the transformed output is used to generate the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

6 . The method of claim 1 wherein the first and second cutting models are different cutting models, the method further comprising:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, selecting the second cutting model.

7 . The method of claim 6 wherein the sensed operating condition is at least a threshold level of changes to the operating conditions.

8 . The method of claim 7 wherein the changes are due to wear of a torch that is installed in the plasma or laser cutting system.

9 . The method of claim 6 , the method further comprising:

causing the plasma or laser cutting system to perform an intra-project cutting test,

and wherein the sensing of an operating condition comprises sensing a result of the intra-project cutting test.

10 . A computer-readable medium not constituting transitory propagating signals per se, having contents configured to cause a computing system to perform a method for performing a plasma or laser cutting project using a plasma or laser cutting system, the method comprising:

during a single, uninterrupted performance of the plasma or laser cutting project, wherein the plasma or laser cutting project includes at least: (1)

a first cutting model with one or more first machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a first routed geometry, and (2)

a second cutting model with one or more second machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a second routed geometry:

(a) causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry; and

(b) after (a) causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

11 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein each (1) and (2) comprises applying one or more cutting models to obtain a tool path, and interpolating the tool path to obtain machine commands.

12 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein the plasma or laser cutting system executes the one or more second machine commands to perform a subsequent cutting streak of the second routed geometry immediately after the plasma or laser cutting system's execution of the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry.

13 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying the same cutting model.

14 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying different cutting models, and wherein the method further comprises:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, applying a correction transformation to an output of the second cutting model to obtain transformed output,

and wherein the transformed output is used to generate the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

15 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 wherein the first and second cutting models are different cutting models, and wherein the method further comprises:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, selecting the second cutting model.

16 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 wherein the sensed operating condition is at least a threshold level of changes to the operating conditions.

17 . The computer-readable medium of claim 16 wherein the changes are due to wear of a torch that is installed in the plasma or laser cutting system.

18 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises:

causing the plasma or laser cutting system to perform an intra-project cutting test,

and wherein the sensing of an operating condition comprises sensing a result of the intra-project cutting test.

19 . A system comprising:

one or more processors; and

at least a memory configured to store contents, which when executed by the one or more processors cause the system to perform a method for performing a plasma or laser cutting project using a plasma or laser cutting system, the method comprising:

during a single, uninterrupted performance of the plasma or laser cutting project, wherein the plasma or laser cutting project includes at least: (1) a first cutting model with one or more first machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a first routed geometry, and (2) a second cutting model with one or more second machine commands for performing one or more cutting streaks of a second routed geometry:

(a) causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry;

(b) after (a), causing the plasma or laser cutting system to execute the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

20 . The system of claim 19 wherein (1) and (2) comprises applying one or more cutting models to obtain a tool path, and interpolating the tool path to obtain machine commands.

21 . The system of claim 19 wherein the plasma or laser cutting system executes the one or more second machine commands to perform a subsequent cutting streak of the second routed geometry immediately after the plasma or laser cutting system's execution of the one or more first machine commands of the first routed geometry.

22 . The system of claim 19 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying the same cutting model.

23 . The system of claim 19 wherein (1) and (2) comprise applying different cutting models, and wherein the method further comprises:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, applying a correction transformation to an output of the second cutting model to obtain transformed output,

and wherein the transformed output is used to generate the one or more second machine commands of the second routed geometry.

24 . The system of claim 19 wherein the first and second cutting models are different cutting models, and wherein the method further comprises:

sensing an operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system; and

based on the sensed operating condition of the plasma or laser cutting system and information about the first and second cutting models, selecting the second cutting model.

25 . The system of claim 24 wherein the sensed operating condition is at least a threshold level of changes to the operating conditions.

26 . The system of claim 25 wherein the changes are due to wear of a torch that is installed in the plasma or laser cutting system.

27 . The system of claim 24 , wherein the method further comprises:

causing the plasma or laser cutting system to perform an intra-project cutting test,

and wherein the sensing of an operating condition comprises sensing a result of the intra-project cutting test.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 23, 2025
From: OMAX CORPORATION
To: HYPERTHERM, INC.
Reel/Frame 071018/0319 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2024
From: HENNING, AXEL H., DR.; O'CONNOR, JAMES M.; OLSEN, CARL
To: OMAX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 068679/0219 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17207515 · Mar 19, 2021
Continuation 16207627 · Dec 3, 2018
Continuation 15894634 · Feb 12, 2018
Continuation 14333470 · Jul 16, 2014
Provisional Application 61930447 · Jan 22, 2014
Related Publication 20240027992A1 · Jan 25, 2024
References Cited (49)
US 4435902A · Mercer · 1984 [cited by examiner]
US 5508596A · Olsen · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5854744A · Zeng · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5986425A · Onishi · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6120351A · Zeng · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6155245A · Zanzuri · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6243625B1 · Wyatt · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6922605B1 · Olsen · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7815490B2 · Liu · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8024068B2 · Gray · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8676372B1 · Bolin · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8892236B2 · Olsen · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9044873B2 · Guglielmetti · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9720399B2 · Henning · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9727051B2 · Henning · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10209107B2 · Oki · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20020066345A1 · Shepherd · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020099835A1 · Chen · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030065424A1 · Erichsen · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20070037496A1 · Habermann · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090071303A1 · Hashish · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090272245A1 · Voice · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090325468A1 · El-Wardany · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100227305A1 · Bakir · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100267314A1 · Cvjeticanin · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110060439A1 · Lukis · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110287692A1 · Erichsen · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110294401A1 · Habermann · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120021676A1 · Schubert · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120022839A1 · Valicek · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120065769A1 · Knaupp · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130025422A1 · Chillman · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130345853A1 · Berman · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140030963A1 · Kanazawa · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140045409A1 · Zhang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150134093A1 · Dos Reis Alipio Da Cruz · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205289A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205290A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205291A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205292A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205293A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205295A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150205296A1 · Henning · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150251267A1 · Winn · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190101894A1 · Henning · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 103488127A · 2014 [cited by examiner]
EP 2584419A2 · 2013 [cited by examiner]
FR 2659264A1 · 1991 [cited by examiner]
WO WO03089999A1 · 2003 [cited by examiner]