IP Library Patent Application 18342101
Patent Application
App. No. 18/342,101

HIERARCHICAL NOVELTY DETECTION USING INTENDED STATES FOR NETWORK SECURITY

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
18/342,101
Abstract

The disclosure provides an approach for detecting and preventing attacks in a network. Embodiments include determining a plurality of network behaviors of a process by monitoring the process. Embodiments include generating a plurality of intended states for the process based on subsets of the plurality of network behaviors. Embodiments include determining a plurality of intended state clusters by applying a clustering technique to the plurality of intended states. Embodiments include determining a state of the process. Embodiments include identifying a given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process. Embodiments include selecting a novelty detection technique based on a size of the given cluster. Embodiments include using the novelty detection technique to determine, based on the given cluster and the state of the process, whether to generate a security alert for the process.

Claims (66)

1 . A method of detecting and preventing attacks in a network, comprising:

determining a plurality of network behaviors of a process;

generating a plurality of intended states for the process based on subsets of the plurality of network behaviors;

determining a plurality of intended state clusters by applying a clustering technique to the plurality of intended states;

determining a state of the process;

identifying a given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process;

selecting a novelty detection technique based on a size of the given cluster; and

using the novelty detection technique to determine, based on the given cluster and the state of the process, whether to perform one or more security threat prevention actions.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the plurality of intended states of the process comprises extracting features from the subsets of the plurality of network behaviors to produce feature vectors.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein applying the clustering technique to the plurality of intended states comprises applying k-modes or k-means clustering to the feature vectors.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process comprises comparing the state of the process to a reference point of the given cluster.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the novelty detection technique is selected from:

a tree-based model;

weighted hamming distances; or

review by a user.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a security alert is generated if the novelty detection technique indicates that the state of the process is an anomaly.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the state of the process comprises a feature vector indicating one or more of:

the process did or did not make outbound public address access;

the process did or did not make outbound private address access;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an ephemeral port;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an a well-known port;

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on an ephemeral port;

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on an a well-known port;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an a specific port; or

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on a particular port.

8 . A system, comprising: one or more processors; and a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the system to perform a method of detecting and preventing attacks in a network, the method comprising:

determining a plurality of network behaviors of a process;

generating a plurality of intended states for the process based on subsets of the plurality of network behaviors;

determining a plurality of intended state clusters by applying a clustering technique to the plurality of intended states;

determining a state of the process;

identifying a given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process;

selecting a novelty detection technique based on a size of the given cluster; and

using the novelty detection technique to determine, based on the given cluster and the state of the process, whether to perform one or more security threat prevention actions.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein generating the plurality of intended states of the process comprises extracting features from the subsets of the plurality of network behaviors to produce feature vectors.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein applying the clustering technique to the plurality of intended states comprises applying k-modes or k-means clustering to the feature vectors.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein identifying the given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process comprises comparing the state of the process to a reference point of the given cluster.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the novelty detection technique is selected from:

a tree-based model;

weighted hamming distances; or

review by a user.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein a security alert is generated if the novelty detection technique indicates that the state of the process is an anomaly.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the state of the process comprises a feature vector indicating one or more of:

the process did or did not make outbound public address access;

the process did or did not make outbound private address access;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an ephemeral port;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an a well-known port;

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on an ephemeral port;

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on an a well-known port;

the process did or did not make an outbound connection on an a specific port; or

the process did or did not receive an inbound connection on a particular port.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a computing system, cause the computing system to perform a method of detecting and preventing attacks in a network, the method comprising:

determining a plurality of network behaviors of a process;

generating a plurality of intended states for the process based on subsets of the plurality of network behaviors;

determining a plurality of intended state clusters by applying a clustering technique to the plurality of intended states;

determining a state of the process;

identifying a given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process;

selecting a novelty detection technique based on a size of the given cluster; and

using the novelty detection technique to determine, based on the given cluster and the state of the process, whether to perform one or more security threat prevention actions.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein generating the plurality of intended states of the process comprises extracting features from the subsets of the plurality of network behaviors to produce feature vectors.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein applying the clustering technique to the plurality of intended states comprises applying k-modes or k-means clustering to the feature vectors.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein identifying the given cluster of the plurality of intended state clusters that corresponds to the state of the process comprises comparing the state of the process to a reference point of the given cluster.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the novelty detection technique is selected from:

a tree-based model;

weighted hamming distances; or

review by a user.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein a security alert is generated if the novelty detection technique indicates that the state of the process is an anomaly.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 8, 2024
From: VMWARE, INC.
To: VMWARE LLC
Reel/Frame 067355/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2023
From: MO, ZHEN; GANTI, VIJAY; KASSA, DEBESSAY FESEHAYE; RAZ, BARAK; LI, HONGLEI
To: VMWARE, INC.
Reel/Frame 064081/0067 →