IP Library Granted Patent US 12,246,916
Granted Patent B2
US 12,246,916 · App. 18/342,330 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Automatic control of a refuse front end loader

Inventors: Ralph Waldo Whitfield, Jr. (Rainbow City, AL); Brian Huston Ham (Huntsville, AL); John M. Curotto (Sonoma, CA); Andrew Blaine Cooper (Signal Mountain, TN); Brian T. Parker (Signal Mountain, TN)
Assignee: The Heil Company
B65F3/041B65F2003/025B65F2003/0279B65F2003/146G06Q10/30Y02W90/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,246,916
App. No.
18/342,330
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automatic control system for a refuse vehicle includes a mode select switch disposed within the vehicle that generates a mode select signal based on input from an operator of the vehicle, a control mechanism disposed within the vehicle that operates in response to the mode select signal, and a plurality of sensors adapted to sense a plurality of characteristics of the vehicle and adapted to communicate the plurality of sensed characteristics. The system further includes a control module that receives control instructions from the control mechanism and selectively controls at least one component of a plurality of components of the vehicle based on the mode select signal, at least one of the plurality of sensed characteristics, and the control instructions.

Claims (48)

1. A refuse vehicle, comprising:

a container coupled to a chassis of the refuse vehicle;

a lift coupled to the container, the lift comprising an arm assembly configured to engage a refuse receptacle;

a plurality of sensors configured to monitor the lift and output sensed data, the plurality of sensors comprising an overhead obstruction sensor configured to sense a distance between (i) the refuse vehicle and (ii) objects within the space that are external to the refuse vehicle;

an automatic control system comprising a processor configured to execute instructions stored in memory to:

based on at least a portion of the sensed data, instruct the lift to execute a dump cycle to dump refuse from the refuse receptacle into the container; and

inhibit one or more functions of the lift in response to a determination that the distance is less than a predetermined threshold distance; and

an operator interface unit configured to display a state of the lift based on at least a portion of the sensed data,

wherein the plurality of sensors further comprises an arm position sensor attached to the arm assembly of the lift, and wherein the sensed data comprises a value from the arm position sensor indicative of a position of the arm assembly, and

wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to execute instructions stored in memory to:

i) determine a measured angle of the arm assembly of the lift relative to the refuse vehicle based on the value from the arm position sensor, and

ii) determine that the refuse receptacle has been dumped based on the measured angle.

2. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein refuse vehicle defines a forward direction of travel, and wherein the container resides on the chassis of the refuse vehicle behind an operator cab of the refuse vehicle.

3. The refuse vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the arm assembly comprises a front-loading arm assembly extending from behind the operator cab to in front of the operator cab, and wherein the refuse receptacle comprises a carry can supporting a loader arm.

4. The refuse vehicle of claim 3 , wherein the front-loading arm assembly comprises a fork mechanism engaging the front-loading arm assembly to the carry can.

5. The refuse vehicle of claim 2 , wherein the arm assembly comprises a side-loading arm assembly residing behind the operator cab.

6. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , further comprising a multi-mode operator-actuated controller.

7. The refuse vehicle of claim 6 , wherein the multi-mode operator-actuated controller comprises a joystick controller.

8. The refuse vehicle of claim 7 , wherein the state of the multi-mode operator-actuated controller comprises an auto-lift mode and actuation of the joystick controller along an axis.

9. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to execute instructions stored in memory to generate an alarm in response to a determination based on the value from the arm position sensor that a refuse vehicle height is greater than a predetermined threshold height.

10. The refuse vehicle of claim 9 , wherein the operator interface unit is configured to display an indicator corresponding to the alarm.

11. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the obstruction sensor is configured to detect a presence of an object within a distance from the arm assembly of the lift.

12. The refuse vehicle of claim 11 , wherein the sensed data comprises a signal indicative of the distance between the object and the arm assembly of the lift.

13. The refuse vehicle of claim 12 , wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to execute instructions stored in memory to:

i) determine whether the object obstructs an operation of the lift based on the value from the arm position sensor, and

ii) modify one or more functions of the lift based on the values from the arm position sensor and the obstruction sensor.

14. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to execute instructions stored in memory to decelerate movement of the lift during the dump cycle based on the value from the arm position sensor.

15. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors comprises a weight sensor attached to the arm assembly of the lift.

16. The refuse vehicle of claim 15 , wherein the weight sensor comprises at least one of a load cell or a strain gauge.

17. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to instruct the lift based on vehicle data comprising a road speed.

18. The refuse vehicle of claim 17 , wherein the processor of the automatic control system is configured to:

determine that the road speed is below a predetermined threshold speed and responsively return the lift to a stored position; and

determine that the road speed is above a predetermined threshold speed and responsively inhibit one or more functions of the lift.

19. The refuse vehicle of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of sensors comprises at least one of a tailgate sensor, a side door sensor, a packer sensor, a fork position sensor, and a body position sensor.

20. A refuse vehicle, comprising:

a container coupled to a chassis of the refuse vehicle;

a lift coupled to the container, the lift comprising an arm assembly configured to engage a refuse receptacle;

a plurality of sensors configured to monitor the lift and output sensed data;

an automatic control system comprising a processor configured to execute instructions stored in memory to:

based on at least a portion of the sensed data, instruct the lift to execute a dump cycle to dump refuse from the refuse receptacle into the container; and

instruct the lift based on vehicle data comprising a road speed, the processor being configured to:

cause the lift to return to a stored position in response to determining that the road speed is below a first predetermined threshold speed; and

inhibit one or more functions of the lift in response to determining that the road speed is above a second predetermined threshold speed; and

an operator interface unit configured to display a state of the lift based on at least a portion of the sensed data,

wherein the plurality of sensors comprises an arm position sensor attached to the arm assembly of the lift, and wherein the sensed data comprises a value from the arm position sensor indicative of a position of the arm assembly, and

wherein the processor of the automatic control system is further configured to execute instructions stored in memory to:

i) determine a measured angle of the arm assembly of the lift relative to the refuse vehicle based on the value from the arm position sensor, and

ii) determine that the refuse receptacle has been dumped based on the measured angle.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 9, 2024
From: THE HEIL CO.; TEREX USA, LLC; TEREX SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Reel/Frame 069177/0271 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 29, 2023
From: WHITFIELD, RALPH WALDO, JR.; HAM, BRIAN HUSTON; CUROTTO, JOHN M.; COOPER, ANDREW BLAINE; PARKER, BRIAN T.
To: THE HEIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064116/0152 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17816541 · Aug 1, 2022
Continuation 16229070 · Dec 21, 2018
Continuation 15244291 · Aug 23, 2016
Continuation 14276423 · May 13, 2014
Provisional Application 61824605 · May 17, 2013
Related Publication 20230339678A1 · Oct 26, 2023
References Cited (77)
US 3282453A · Wood · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 3474923A · Anderson · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 4100740A · Stewart · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4219298A · Stragier et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4349305A · Wynn et al. · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 4547118A · Pittenger · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5014206A · Scribner · 1991 [cited by examiner]
US 5145305A · Green · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5178226A · Bowman et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5470187A · Smith et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5601391A · Gazza · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5601392A · Smith et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5743698A · Smith et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5816766A · Clark · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5837945A · Cornwell · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5851100A · Brandt · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5861580A · Moore et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5890865A · Smith et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5954470A · Duell · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 5967731A · Brandt · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6123497A · Duell et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6152673A · Anderson et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6158945A · Anderson et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6226582B1 · Adsett et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6332745B1 · Duell et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6422800B1 · Reichow et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6584884B1 · Duell · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6648576B1 · Duell et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7070381B2 · Khan et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7072745B2 · Pillar et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7559732B2 · Khan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7559733B2 · Khan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7559734B2 · Khan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7681340B2 · Treuthardt · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7725225B2 · Pillar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7831352B2 · Laumer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7937162B2 · Thomson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8078297B2 · Lasher et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8092141B2 · Curotto et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8191363B2 · Laumer et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8550764B2 · Rowland et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9428128B2 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9428334B2 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10196206B2 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11407585B2 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020159870A1 · Pruteanu · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020182044A1 · Yu · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030130765A1 · Pillar · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040055802A1 · Pillar · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050110330A1 · Khan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060032657A1 · Zarembo · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060032957A1 · Kolbet · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060181108A1 · Cleland · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070278019A1 · Santi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070294014A1 · Green · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080141805A1 · Birk et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080294314A1 · Morris · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090306863A1 · Curotto · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120282077A1 · Alberts · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130034412A1 · Goedken · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130039728A1 · Price et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130302119A1 · Steege · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130343845A1 · Rowland et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266859A1 · Kurihara · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140343801A1 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140375503A1 · Kurihara · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150077281A1 · Taniguchi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150343976A1 · Lim · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160355335A1 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190218032A1 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20230015879A1 · Whitfield, Jr. et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 2305578A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
FR 2964648 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013060281 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
English Translation of EP2305578, accessed Dec. 2024 via Espacenet (Year: 2024). [cited by examiner]
CA Office Action in Canadian Appln. No. 2851938, dated Jun. 3, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Second Examination Report issued in Australian Application No. 2014202671, dated May 8, 2018, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]