IP Library Granted Patent US 12,631,786
Granted Patent B2
US 12,631,786 · App. 18/344,632 · Granted May 19, 2026

Evaluation of cement sheath damage in underground storage cavity during earthquake

Inventor: Yanhui Han (Houston, TX)
Assignee: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
G01V20/00E21B41/0057E21B49/00E21B2200/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,631,786
App. No.
18/344,632
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for evaluating potential damage to a cement sheath in an underground gas storage facility during an earthquake. A ground surface earthquake (EQ) wave is obtained on which a deconvolution analysis is performed, producing a subsurface EQ wave. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of a casing-cement-rock well system are obtained, and a computational model of the underground gas storage facility is generated. A gas pressure value is applied to the model, and, after boundary conditions are applied, a static equilibrium state is simulated. The subsurface EQ wave and boundary conditions are applied to the model, and, based on the gas pressure value, a dynamic seismic event is simulated. Based on the effect of the seismic simulation on the integrity of the underground gas storage facility, at least one parameter related to the operation of the underground gas storage facility may be adjusted.

Claims (49)

1 . A method for evaluating potential damage to a cement sheath in an underground gas storage facility during an earthquake, comprising:

obtaining a plurality of data points related to one or more static mechanical properties of a casing-cement-rock well system;

obtaining a plurality of data points related to one or more dynamic mechanical properties of the casing-cement-rock well system;

obtaining a ground surface earthquake (EQ) wave;

performing a deconvolution analysis on the ground surface EQ wave to produce a subsurface EQ wave;

generating a computational model of the casing-cement-rock well system and an underground storage cavern, wherein the computational model comprises an upper surface, one or more lateral surfaces, and a lower surface, and wherein a roller boundary is applied to the lower surface;

applying a first gas pressure value to the computational model;

using the computational model, simulating a first static equilibrium state based on the first gas pressure value;

applying a quiet boundary to the upper surface and the one or more lateral surfaces;

using the computational model, simulating a first dynamic seismic event based on the first gas pressure value and the subsurface EQ wave;

continuously evaluating a first effect of the first dynamic seismic event on a first integrity of the casing-cement-rock well system and the underground storage cavern,

wherein continuously evaluating the first effect identifies a safe operating gas pressure window comprising a range of safe gas pressure values of the underground gas storage facility that mitigate earthquake-induced damage to the underground gas storage facility; and

adjusting at least one parameter related to an operation of the underground gas storage facility based on the first effect of the first dynamic seismic event on the first integrity of the casing-cement-rock well system and the underground storage cavern,

wherein the at least one parameter comprises an adjusted gas pressure of the underground gas storage facility, the adjusted gas pressure selected from the range of safe gas pressure values of the safe operating gas pressure window,

wherein adjusting the at least one parameter mitigates the earthquake-induced damage to the underground gas storage facility.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

applying a second gas pressure value to the computational model;

using the computational model, simulating a second static equilibrium state based on the second gas pressure value;

using the computational model, simulating a second dynamic seismic event based on the second gas pressure value and the subsurface EQ wave;

continuously evaluating a second effect of the second dynamic seismic event on a second integrity of the casing-cement-rock well system and the underground storage cavern; and

adjusting at least one parameter related to the operation of the underground gas storage facility based on the second effect of the second dynamic seismic event on the second integrity of the casing-cement-rock well system and the underground storage cavern.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper surface is a surface above the underground storage cavern, the one or more lateral surfaces are surfaces lateral to the underground storage cavern, and the lower surface is a surface beneath the underground storage cavern.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the computational model further comprises:

assigning the one or more static mechanical properties to a corresponding component on the computational model;

assigning the one or more dynamic mechanical properties to a corresponding component on the computational model;

applying a first stress boundary condition to the upper surface; and

applying a second stress boundary condition to the one or more lateral surfaces.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the first stress boundary condition is an overburden value, and the second stress boundary condition is a horizontal stress value.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the ground surface EQ wave is a historical ground surface EQ wave recorded in a location at or near a location of the underground gas storage facility.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein performing the deconvolution analysis comprises:

obtaining one or more properties of one or more geologic layers;

using the one or more properties of the one or more geologic layers, deconvoluting the ground surface EQ wave to a subsurface location, wherein the subsurface location is at a depth beneath the underground storage cavern; and

determining the subsurface EQ wave at the subsurface location.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein simulating the first dynamic seismic event further comprises:

removing the roller boundary from the lower surface;

applying the subsurface EQ wave to the lower surface; and

advancing the computational model through a duration of the subsurface EQ wave.

9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein simulating the second static equilibrium state further comprises:

removing the subsurface EQ wave from the lower surface;

removing the quiet boundary from the upper surface and the one or more lateral surfaces; and

applying the roller boundary to the lower surface.

10 . The method of claim 2 , wherein simulating the second dynamic seismic event further comprises:

applying the quiet boundary to the upper surface and the one or more lateral surfaces;

removing the roller boundary from the lower surface;

applying the subsurface EQ wave to the lower surface; and

advancing the computational model through a duration of the subsurface EQ wave.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises a specific cement composition.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises a casing material property.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one parameter comprises an architecture of the underground storage cavern.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 18, 2023
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065268/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 17, 2023
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 065255/0318 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 2023
From: HAN, YANHUI
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 064568/0600 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250004163A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (21)
US 20100312589A1 · Gerald et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110066380A1 · Hager et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120109611A1 · Loizzo et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150300159A1 · Stiles et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20200325759A1 · Sharma · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210082543A1 · Mn et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20240401431A1 · Jandhyala · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 102495935B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 112814739B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Li, Longxin, et al. “Underground gas storage process optimization using integrated subsurface characterization, dynamic modeling and monitoring-a case study.” Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference.… [cited by examiner]
Bois, Axel-Pierre et al., “Cement sheath integrity for CO2 storage—An integrated perspective”; Energy Procedia; vol. 37; pp. 5628-5641; 2013 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Wang, Tongtao et al., “Dynamic response of underground gas storage salt cavern under seismic loads”; Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology; vol. 43; pp. 241-252; Jul. 2014 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Shadravan, Arash et al., “Using Fatigue-Failure Envelope for Cement-Sheath-Integrity Evaluation”; SPE Drilling & Completion; vol. 30, Issue 1, Paper No. SPE-168321-PA; pp. 68-75; Mar. 2015 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Bois, Axel-Pierre et al., “Use of a Mechanistic Model to Forecast Cement-Sheath Intergrity”; SPE Drilling & Completion; vol. 27, Issue 2, Paper No. SPE-139668-PA; pp. 303-314; Jun. 2012 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Habibi, Rahim et al., “Stability analysis of complex behavior of salt cavern subjected to cyclic loading by laboratory measurement and numerical modeling using LOCAS (case study: Nasrabad gas storage salt cavern)”; Envi… [cited by applicant]
Han, Y. et al., “Numerical Modeling of Elastic Spherical Contact for Mohr-Coulomb Type Failures in Micro-Geomaterials”; Experimental Mechanics; vol. 57, Issue 7; pp. 1091-1105; Sep. 2017 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
He, Tao et al., “Fatigue Damage of Wellbore Cement Sheath in Gas Storage Salt Cavern Under Alternating Internal Pressure”; Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering; vol. 55, Issue 2; pp. 715-732; Feb. 2022 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
He, Tao et al., “Integrity analysis of wellbores in the bedded salt cavern for energy storage”; Energy; vol. 263, Part B, Article 125841; pp. 1-18; Jan. 15, 2023 (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
He, Tao et al., “Failure mode of cement sheath in salt cavern gas storge wellbore based on coupling plasticity and damage evolution”; International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences; vol. 160, Article 105272… [cited by applicant]
Zhuang, Haiyang et al., “Seismic response and damage analysis of underground structures considering the effect of concrete diaphragm wall”; Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering; vol. 116; pp. 278-288; Jan. 2019 (11 … [cited by applicant]
Idriss, I. M et al. (Eds.), “User's Manual for SHAKE91”; A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seismic Response Analyses of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits; Structures Division, Building and Fire Resear… [cited by applicant]