IP Library Granted Patent US 12,299,749
Granted Patent B2
US 12,299,749 · App. 18/351,908 · Granted May 13, 2025

Computer architectures and associated methods for enabling real-time data determinations and distribution

Inventors: Eugene Kakaulin (New York, NY); Michael Tanenbaum (New York, NY); Andrew Stead (New York, NY); Eric Young (New York, NY); Charles A. Jacoby (New York, NY)
Assignee: Hippo Technologies LLC
G06Q40/08G06F3/0482G06F16/29G06Q20/40G16H20/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,299,749
App. No.
18/351,908
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Computer architectures and associated methods for real-time data processing are disclosed. In some embodiments, a trial adjudication request for a cost determination can be received by a first server and verified using a security protocol, wherein a password token of the trial adjudication request can be matched to a stored password token. The first server can transmit an adjudication command packet to a second server that includes at least one data set of a plurality of data sets and a command for a claim determination, and can receive a response packet from the second server. The first server can determine that a successful claim determination was performed by the second server from the response packet, and can transmit a reversal request packet to the second server which can cancel the successful claim determination. The first server can perform the electronic calculation using the claim data.

Claims (30)

1. A method for data processing comprising:

receiving patient data from a first server based upon input from a patient's computer device, wherein the patient data comprises prescription data and location data, wherein the prescription data corresponds to a prescribed medication;

sending a derived data request associated with the prescribed medication to a second server, wherein the derived data request is generated using the received patient data and comprises a first encrypted password token for verifying the derived data request;

receiving medication data from the second server in response to the derived data request after the second server verifies the derived data request using the first encrypted password token, wherein the medication data corresponds to the prescribed medication;

sending an adjudication request associated with the prescribed medication to a third server, wherein the adjudication request is generated using the received patient data and the received medication data and comprises a second encrypted password token for verifying the adjudication request; and

receiving co-pay data from the third server in response to the adjudication request after the third server verifies the adjudication request using the second encrypted password token;

wherein the co-pay data is transmitted to the patient's computer device, wherein the co-pay data is configured for display on a graphical user interface of the patient's computer device, and wherein the co-pay data is continually refreshed and new co-pay data is transmitted to the patient's computer device in real time if the adjudication request results in revised co-pay data.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the medication data further corresponds to alternatives to the prescribed medication.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient data includes insurance data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein a co-pay adjudication is generated in response to the adjudication request, and the co-pay adjudication generates the co-pay data.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the co-pay adjudication is reversed based upon a reversal request to cancel the co-pay adjudication.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the co-pay adjudication uses a masked data structure that corresponds to a national provider identifier (NPI) of a pharmacy.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the co-pay data corresponds to at least a co-pay associated with the prescribed medication.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the co-pay data corresponds to a failed adjudication request.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the failed adjudication request is recorded in a decentralized ledger.

10. A data processing system comprising:

a first receiver configured to receive patient data from a first server based upon input from a patient's computer device, wherein the patient data comprises prescription data and location data, wherein the prescription data corresponds to a prescribed medication;

a first transmitter for sending a derived data request associated with the prescribed medication to a second server, wherein the derived data request is generated using the received patient data and comprises a first encrypted password token for verifying the derived data request;

a second receiver configured to receive medication data from the second server in response to the derived data request after the second server verifies the derived data request using the first encrypted password token, wherein the medication data corresponds to the prescribed medication;

a second transmitter configured to send an adjudication request associated with the prescribed medication to a third server, wherein the adjudication request is generated using the received patient data and the received medication data and comprises a second encrypted password token for verifying the adjudication request; and

a third receiver configured to receive co-pay data from the third server in response to the adjudication request after the third server verifies the adjudication request using the second encrypted password token;

wherein the co-pay data is transmitted to the patient's computer device, wherein the co-pay data is configured for display on a graphical user interface of the patient's computer device, and wherein the co-pay data is continually refreshed and new co-pay data is transmitted to the patient's computer device in real time if the adjudication request results in revised co-pay data.

11. The data processing system of claim 10 , wherein the medication data further corresponds to alternatives to the prescribed medication.

12. The data processing system of claim 10 , wherein the patient data includes insurance data.

13. The data processing system of claim 10 , wherein a co-pay adjudication is generated in response to the adjudication request, and the co-pay adjudication generates the co-pay data.

14. The data processing system of claim 13 , wherein the co-pay adjudication is reversed based upon a reversal request to cancel the co-pay adjudication.

15. The data processing system of claim 13 , wherein the co-pay adjudication uses a masked data structure that corresponds to a national provider identifier (NPI) of a pharmacy.

16. The data processing system of claim 10 , wherein the co-pay data corresponds to at least a co-pay associated with the prescribed medication.

17. The data processing system of claim 10 , wherein the co-pay data corresponds to a failed adjudication request.

18. The data processing system of claim 17 , wherein the failed adjudication request is recorded in a decentralized ledger.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2025
From: HIPPO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 073304/0537 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: KAKAULIN, EUGENE; TANENBAUM, MICHAEL; STEAD, ANDREW; YOUNG, ERIC
To: HIPPO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 064288/0558 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2023
From: JACOBY, CHARLES A.
To: HIPPO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 064288/0728 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16541747 · Aug 15, 2019
Continuation 15897083 · Feb 14, 2018
Related Publication 20230385949A1 · Nov 30, 2023
References Cited (83)
US 7152693B2 · Man · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 7711577B2 · Dust et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7734483B1 · Smith et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7743979B2 · Fredman · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7912741B1 · Pinsonneault · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 7917372B2 · Oscar et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7957983B2 · Hoffman et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8036916B2 · Dust et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8082173B2 · Kost et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8099295B2 · Virdee et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8112287B1 · Paul et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8112288B1 · Paul et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8296164B2 · Oscar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8380540B1 · Smith et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8521551B1 · Paul et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8521557B1 · Ringold et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8626524B1 · Koehl et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8670991B2 · Kost et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8670996B1 · Weiss · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8683562B2 · Ting et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8706522B2 · Cohan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8712797B1 · Bezdek et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8738399B1 · Abou Nader et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9773094B1 · Balagere et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9786023B2 · Cohan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10157262B1 · Pinsonneault · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10373255B1 · Cedergreen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10438693B1 · Vandervoort · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20020110136A1 · Wakai et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111832A1 · Judge · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20060229932A1 · Zollo et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070018794A1 · Bares et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070133591A1 · Shatford · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070276697A1 · Wiley, II · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080040164A1 · Curtin · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090157748A1 · Hess · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070757A1 · Martinez · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100211415A1 · Tholl · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110161106A1 · Chapman · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110282689A1 · Patel · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120185263A1 · Emert · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120253831A1 · John · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130151281A1 · Kaburick et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130219473A1 · Schaefer · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130311205A1 · Creswell · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140201021A1 · Begley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244307A1 · Shutko et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140244546A1 · Bezdek et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278476A1 · Abadi · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140278482A1 · Shah · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140316830A1 · Langhorne, III · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140324447A1 · Dittus · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150128532A1 · Miller et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150222479A1 · Kim et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150242592A1 · Weiss et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150254428A1 · Burkett · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370998A1 · Mohebbi · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160042148A1 · Bradley · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160321406A1 · Timmerman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170039331A1 · Bezdek et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170161458A1 · Rourke et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170255759A1 · McGrath · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170262594A1 · Janin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CA 2531875A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CA 2685273A1 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
CA 2839167A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CA 2881862A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CA 2895024A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2011143612A1 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2014145170A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Kao et al.: A Blockchain-based Ledger for tw-DRG Claim Auditing, Feb. 2, 2017, International Journal of ScientificEngineering and Applied Svcience (IJSEAS), vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 10 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Kao et al.:A Blockchian-based Ledger for tw_DRG Claim Auditing, Feb. 2017, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Applied Science (IJSEAS), vol. 3, Issue 2, pp. 1-10 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Allan et al.: Physician Awareness of Drug Cost: A Systematic Review, 2007, PLOS Medicine, pp. 1-23 (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
Anderson, Brian N.: Are Your Pharmacy Benefits Being Adjudicated Properly? A PBM Audit Can Tell You, May 2014, Benefits Magazine, pp. 22-27. (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
“Are you giving your patients access to the lowest prices for their medications?” SunRx.com (2017), p. 1 (https://kyha.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/Solutions/Affinity/SUNRx%20CashCard%2011-16-2017%20Final.pdf). [cited by applicant]
Accounting Tools: Reversing entries, Nov. 9, 2017, pp. 1-2. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
Allan et al., “Physician Awareness of Drug Cost: A Systematic Review,” PLOS Medicine, pp. 1-23 (Year: 2007). [cited by applicant]
American Pharmacist Association (APhA): HIPPA; National Provider Identifier (NPI), Mar. 14-17, 2008, APhA 2008 San Diego Annual Meeting Expositions, pp. 1-3. (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
Kao et al., “A Blockchian-based Ledger for tw_DRG Claim Auditing,” Feb. 2017, International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Appked Science (USEAS), pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
NextGen: New Account Receivable Workflow, May 7, 2017, pp. 1-8. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]
North Carolina Medicaid Management Information System (NCMMIS): How to Enter a Pharmacy Reversal on the Provider Portal, Mar. 11, 2013, pp. 1-3. (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
Prevention Magazine, “Natural Alternatives to the Top 5 most prescribed drugs,” Mind and Body, published Feb. 24, 2012, updated Oct. 25, 2015, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
SEGIP: Now you can compare pharmacy prices for your prescriptions, Feb. 16, 2017, Management and Budget, State Employee Group Insurance Program, pp. 1-2. (Year: 2017). [cited by applicant]