IP Library Granted Patent US 12,708,318
Granted Patent B2
US 12,708,318 · App. 18/352,975 · Granted Aug 18, 2026

Systems, methods, and devices for detecting the threshold of nerve-muscle response using variable frequency of stimulation

Inventors: Richard A. O'Brien (Cockeysville, MD); Gregg Johns (Oceanside, CA); Robert Snow (Phoenix, MD); James E. Gharib (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Alphatec Spine, Inc.
A61B5/395A61B5/388A61B5/7214A61N1/36017G16H20/30A61B5/7264A61B5/746
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,708,318
App. No.
18/352,975
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Granted
Aug 18, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3791
USPC
600/546
Abstract

A method for determining a lowest stimulation threshold current level in a group of channels of a neuromonitoring device. The method includes stimulating tissue at a current level from a predetermined range of current levels as a sequence of pulses delivered at a frequency. The stimulating includes increasing the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from an immediately preceding pulse by a first current increment. The method includes determining that a first evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes a first muscular response. The method includes stimulating the tissue with a second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a second muscular response. The stimulating includes decreasing the frequency of the delivery of each pulse in the sequence of pulses and increasing the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse by a second current increment. The method includes determining that the second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes the second muscular response.

Claims (60)

1 . A method for determining a stimulation threshold current level to avoid tetany associated with one or more muscles, the method comprising:

causing, by a stimulation system comprising one or more data processors, stimulation, via one or more electrodes, of tissue of a patient as a sequence of pulses delivered at a current level and a frequency, the causing including increasing the current level of each sequential pulse in the sequence of pulses by a first current increment;

determining, by the stimulation system, that a first evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes a first muscular response, the first evocation pulse reaching predetermined criteria, the first evocation pulse having a first evocation current level, the first muscular response comprising a first evoked response that is processed by the stimulation system to classify the first evoked response;

causing, by the stimulation system, stimulation, via the one or more electrodes, of the tissue with a second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a second muscular response, the causing comprising:

maintaining or decreasing the frequency between each pulse in the sequence of pulses; and

maintaining the current level of one or more pulses in the sequence of pulses at the current level of the first evocation pulse or increasing the current level of one or more pulses in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse by a second current increment;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes the second muscular response, the second muscular response comprising a second evoked response that is processed by the stimulation system to compare the first evoked response to the second evoked response; and

storing, by the stimulation system, based at least in part on the determination that the first evocation pulse evokes the first muscular response and the determination that the second evocation pulse evokes the second muscular response, the first evocation current level as the stimulation threshold current level.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by the stimulation system, that the first evocation pulse and the second evocation pulse are not due to artifact noise present within a first signal representing the first muscular response and artifact noise present within a second signal representing the second muscular response.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second current increment is equal to the first current increment.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining that the first evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes the first muscular response further comprises: storing the first evocation current level of the first evocation pulse.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining that the first evocation pulse evokes the first muscular response includes receiving, by the stimulation system, a first signal representing the first muscular response and the determining that the second evocation pulse evokes the second muscular response includes receiving, by the stimulation system, a second signal representing the second muscular response.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

comparing, by the stimulation system, the first signal to the second signal;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the first signal can be repeatably obtained-based on the comparison between the first signal and the second signal; and

displaying, by the stimulation system, the first evocation current level of the first evocation pulse.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the first signal and the second signal are compared as a group of signals that includes a third signal representing a third muscular response evoked in response to a third evocation pulse.

8 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

comparing, by the stimulation system, the first signal to the second signal;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the first signal is not repeatably obtained based on the comparison between the first signal and the second signal;

causing, by the stimulation system, stimulation of the tissue with a third evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a third muscular response, the causing comprising:

increasing or maintaining, by the stimulation system, the frequency between each pulse in the sequence of pulses; and

increasing, by the stimulation system, the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse or maintaining the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the processing of the first evoked response comprises preprocessing the first evoked response using one or more filtering techniques or mathematical transforms.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the processing of the second evoked response comprises preprocessing the first evoked response using one or more filtering techniques or mathematical transforms.

11 . A method for determining a stimulation threshold current level in a group of channels of a neuromonitoring device, wherein each channel of the group of channels is associated with one or more muscles, the method comprising:

causing, by a stimulation system comprising one or more data processors, stimulation, via one or more electrodes, of tissue within a predetermined range of current levels as a sequence of pulses delivered at a frequency by delivering stimulation signals, the sequence of pulses including:

a first pulse delivered at a first current level within the predetermined range of current levels; and

a second pulse delivered at a second current level within the predetermined range of current levels, the first pulse being delivered immediately preceding the second pulse, and the second current level being higher than the first current level;

determining that the second pulse evokes a first muscular response, the first muscular response comprising a first evoked response that is processed by the stimulation system to classify the first evoked response;

causing, by the stimulation system, stimulation, via the one or more electrodes, the tissue with a third pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a second muscular response, the third pulse being delivered at a third current level that is equal to or higher than the second current level;

determining that the third pulse evokes the second muscular response; and

storing, by the stimulation system, based at least in part on the determination that the second pulse evokes the first muscular response and the determination that the third pulse evokes the second muscular response, the second current level as the stimulation threshold current level.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining, by the stimulation system, that the first pulse and the second pulse are not due to artifact noise present within a first signal representing the first muscular response and artifact noise present within a second signal representing the second muscular response.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the stimulating further comprises:

decreasing or maintaining, by the stimulation system, the frequency between each pulse in the sequence of pulses; and

increasing, by the stimulation system, the current level of the third pulse by an amount that is greater than a difference between the first current level and the second current level.

14 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the determining that the second pulse evokes the first muscular response includes receiving, by the stimulation system, a first signal representing the first muscular response and the determining that the third pulse evokes the second muscular response includes receiving by the stimulation system, a second signal representing the second muscular response.

15 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

comparing, by the stimulation system, the first signal with the second signal;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the first signal can be repeatably obtained-based on the comparison between the first signal and the second signal; and

displaying, by the stimulation system, the second current level of the second pulse.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the first signal and the second signal are compared as a group of signals that includes a third signal representing a third muscular response evoked in response to a third evocation pulse.

17 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising:

comparing, by the stimulation system, the first signal with the second signal;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the first signal is not repeatably obtained based on the comparison between the first signal and the second signal;

causing, by the stimulation system, stimulation of the tissue with a fourth pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a third muscular response, the causing comprising:

increasing or maintaining, by the stimulation system, the frequency between each pulse in the sequence of pulses; and

increasing, by the stimulation system, the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse or maintaining the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse.

18 . A stimulation system for detecting and identifying a stimulation threshold to avoid tetany of a patient's muscles, wherein the system comprises:

at least one processor; and

at least one memory storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, result in operations comprising:

causing, by the stimulation system, stimulation, via one or more electrodes, of the patient's tissue with a sequence of pulses delivered at a current level and a frequency, the causing including increasing the current level of each sequential pulse in the sequence of pulses;

determining, by the stimulation system, that a first evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes a first muscular response, the first evocation pulse having a first evocation current level;

continuing to cause, by the stimulation system, stimulation of the patient's tissue with a second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses to evoke a second muscular response, the causing comprising:

maintaining or decreasing the frequency between each pulse in the sequence of pulses; and

maintaining or increasing the current level of each pulse in the sequence of pulses from the immediately preceding pulse by a second current increment;

determining, by the stimulation system, that the second evocation pulse from the sequence of pulses evokes the second muscular response; and

storing, by the stimulation system, based at least in part on the determination that the first evocation pulse evokes the first muscular response and the determination that the second evocation pulse evokes the second muscular response, the first evocation current level as the stimulation threshold current level.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the operations further comprise determining, by the stimulation system, that the first evocation pulse and the second evocation pulse are not due to artifact noise present within a first signal representing the first muscular response and artifact noise present within a second signal representing the second muscular response.

Assignments (8)
CONFIRMATORY GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS Recorded May 12, 2026
From: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.; SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 075560/0884 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 5, 2026
From: SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
To: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
Reel/Frame 074567/0797 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 68743/0021 Recorded May 1, 2026
From: MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST, AS AGENT
To: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.; SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 075316/0060 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME NO. 68559/0445 Recorded May 1, 2026
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
To: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.; SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 075316/0282 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2024
From: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.; SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
To: MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST
Reel/Frame 068743/0021 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2024
From: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.; SAFEOP SURGICAL, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 068559/0445 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2023
From: GHARIB, JAMES E
To: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
Reel/Frame 065571/0361 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2023
From: O'BRIEN, RICHARD A; JOHNS, GREGG; SNOW, ROBERT
To: ALPHATEC SPINE, INC.
Reel/Frame 065571/0388 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16010157 · Jun 15, 2018
Provisional Application 62592275 · Nov 29, 2017
Provisional Application 62521268 · Jun 16, 2017
Related Publication 20230371876A1 · Nov 23, 2023
References Cited (307)
US 4161945A · Grossman · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4291703A · Kelen · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4305402A · Katims · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4863265A · Flower et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4934377A · Bova et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5024228A · Goldstone et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5139028A · Steinhaus et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5184615A · Nappholz et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5284154A · Vickers et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5313956A · Knutsson et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5662105A · Tien · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5797854A · Hedgecock · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5825936A · Clarke et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5827195A · Lander · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5916179A · Sharrock · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6067467A · John · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6304772B1 · Taha et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6391024B1 · Sun et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6535767B1 · Kronberg · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6556861B1 · Prichep · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6634043B2 · Lamb et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6725086B2 · Marinello · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6985833B2 · Shambroom et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7174206B2 · Frei et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7216001B2 · Hacker et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7234180B2 · Horton et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7286871B2 · Cohen et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7512439B1 · Farazi · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7522953B2 · Kaula et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7620453B1 · Propato et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7628757B1 · Koh · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7628761B2 · Gozani et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7806862B2 · Molnar · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7904160B2 · Brodnick et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8055349B2 · Gharib et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8108039B2 · Saliga et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8255045B2 · Gharib et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8386025B2 · Hoppe · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8440903B1 · Farris, III · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8515530B2 · Warner et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8538512B1 · Bibian et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8538539B2 · Pothier et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8568331B2 · Bertagnoli et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8591431B2 · Calancie et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8731654B2 · Johnson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8740783B2 · Gharib et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8812116B2 · Kaula et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8903487B1 · Fischell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8965520B2 · Botros et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8989866B2 · Gharib et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9084551B2 · Brunnett et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9211074B2 · Johnson et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9332918B1 · Buckley et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9579037B2 · Brunnett et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9585618B2 · Leschinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9681880B2 · Neubardt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9700228B2 · Gharib et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9743853B2 · Kelleher et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9743884B2 · Rasmussen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9744356B2 · Botros et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10327664B2 · Kurtz et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10342443B2 · Johnson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10376167B2 · Mahon et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10391012B2 · Stashuk et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11083387B2 · Mahon et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11197640B2 · Johns et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11684533B2 · Stashuk et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11701047B2 · O'Brien et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11963775B2 · Johns et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020042563A1 · Becerra et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020183605A1 · Devlin et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030052775A1 · Shambroom et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030083719A1 · Shankar et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030125777A1 · Ding et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030176799A1 · Beatty et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040010303A1 · Bolea et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040122482A1 · Tung et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050075578A1 · Gharib et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050085866A1 · Tehrani · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050101878A1 · Daly et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050119711A1 · Cho et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050228306A1 · Kurtz · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050228654A1 · Prieto et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050261559A1 · Mumford et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050277826A1 · Dunseath, Jr. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050278001A1 · Qin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060025702A1 · Sterrantino et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060052845A1 · Zanella · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060173510A1 · Besio et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060178593A1 · Neubardt et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060241562A1 · John et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060276704A1 · Mcginnis et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070016097A1 · Farquhar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070135722A1 · Lin · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070192960A1 · Jackson · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070225674A1 · Molnar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070282217A1 · Mcginnis et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080033511A1 · Dobak · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080051844A1 · Brodnick et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080167574A1 · Farquhar · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080221473A1 · Calancie et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080269835A1 · Carlson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080300655A1 · Cholette · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090033486A1 · Costantino · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090048531A1 · Mcginnis et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090054758A1 · Dunseath · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090054804A1 · Gharib et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090069027A1 · Brock et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090082691A1 · Denison et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090124869A1 · Hu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090143693A1 · Ye et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177112A1 · Calancie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090247893A1 · Lapinlampi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100010367A1 · Foley et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100036211A1 · La Rue et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100042012A1 · Alhussiny · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100130834A1 · ViertiÖ-oja et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100156376A1 · Fu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100198099A1 · Murphy et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100274144A1 · Hu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312124A1 · Johnson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100317989A1 · Gharib et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110054346A1 · Mrva et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110224570A1 · Causevic · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110224988A1 · Mahajan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110230785A1 · Higgins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110279676A1 · Terada et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110295142A1 · Chakravarthy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120065536A1 · Causevic et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120095360A1 · Runney et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120136276A1 · Johnson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120150063A1 · Rea · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120165690A1 · Chen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120197153A1 · Kraus et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120313757A1 · Volpi et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130024524A1 · Graff et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130035606A1 · Wichner · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130116544A1 · Rey et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138356A1 · Nierenberg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130190599A1 · Wyeth et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204156A1 · Hampton et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130245422A1 · D'arcy et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130245424A1 · Decharms · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130245722A1 · Ternes et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130267874A1 · Marcotte et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140020178A1 · Stashuk et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140121555A1 · Scott et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140148725A1 · Cadwell · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140275926A1 · Scott et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140276195A1 · Papay et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288389A1 · Gharib et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140324118A1 · Simon et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150061758A1 · Hsu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150088030A1 · Taylor · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150100104A1 · Kiani et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150148683A1 · Hermanne · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150208934A1 · Sztrubel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150257700A1 · Fu · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150305640A1 · Reinke et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150313512A1 · Hausman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160081570A1 · Farquhar · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160106994A1 · Crosby et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160113587A1 · Kothe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160128620A1 · Iriki et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160135705A1 · Liu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160213268A1 · Kim et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160228018A1 · Mahon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160270679A1 · Mahon et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170050041A1 · Cosman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170303811A1 · Gharib et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170347955A1 · Rasmussen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180078210A1 · Snow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180140843A1 · Kent et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180310849A1 · Johns et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180360336A1 · O'Brien et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190321640A1 · Carmena et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200023198A1 · Gribetz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200206496A1 · Meng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200315478A1 · Mahon et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200398057A1 · Esteller et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220096022A1 · Johns et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220287619A1 · Cleveland et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230310864A1 · Parker · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240268738A1 · Johns et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20250204842A1 · Torres · 2025 [cited by applicant]
CN 1744929A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 101137332A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 101309419A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 201185940Y · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 102361590A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102368951A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102481107A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102594472A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102824170A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 102883775A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 103908248A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104411234A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP S51154986U · 1976 [cited by applicant]
JP S59193403U · 1983 [cited by applicant]
JP S5922106A · 1984 [cited by applicant]
JP S5922106U · 1984 [cited by applicant]
JP S59193403A · 1984 [cited by applicant]
JP H04253843A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP H06508288A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H06277189A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP H1176185A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003131668A · 2003 [cited by applicant]
JP 2004517669A · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005073223A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005519646A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2007185326A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009011896A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009502424A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009071387A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009118969A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009534159A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010104586A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012505707A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012529344A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012236007A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 5466389B2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017502711A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020511276A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2001074248A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 03005887A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2003000128A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2003005887A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006072050A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006084193A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010144200A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011045936A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013166157A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015048822A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016179191A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018232365A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022192569A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“NeuroStream—Intraoperative Monitoring Document Management” [online][retrieved Apr. 21, 2010). Retrieved from the Internet at <http://www.neurostream.us/solutionsonlineDoc.iso?nav=1>. [cited by applicant]
“NeuroStream—Intraoperative Monitoring Interpreting Physician Access” [online][retrieved Apr. 21, 2010). Retrieved from the Internet at Hyperlink “http://www.neurostream.us/solutionstelemedicine.iso?nav=1”. [cited by applicant]
“NeuroStream—IOM and Neurophysiological Monitoring Software” [online][retrieved Apr. 21, 2010). Retrieved from the Internet at Hyperlink “http://www.neurostream.us/solutionscaseExecution.iso?nav=1”. [cited by applicant]
“NeuroStream—Software for Intraoperative Monitoring Scheduling” [online][retrieved Apr. 21, 2010). Retrieved from the Internet at Hyperlink h http://www.neurostream.us/solutionsschedulina.iso?nav= 1. [cited by applicant]
AMSCO 3085 SP Surgical Table Sales Brochure, STERIS Corporation; Apr. 2006, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Baumann, et al., Intraoperative SSEP Detection of Ulnar Nerve Compression or Ischemia in an Obese Patient: A Unique Complication Associated With a Specialized Spinal Retraction System; Archives of Physical Medicine and … [cited by applicant]
Ben-David, et al., Prognosis of Intraoperative Brachial Plexus Injury: A Review of 22 cases, British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 79, No. 4, Oct. 1997, pp. 440-445. [cited by applicant]
Bizzarri, et al., Iatrogenic Injury to the Long Thoracic Nerve: An Underestimated Cause of Morbidity After Cardiac Surgery, Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 28, No. 4, Jan. 2001, pp. 315-317. [cited by applicant]
Chung, Induk, et al., “Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury.” The Spine Journal 9.4 (Apr. 2009): 287-295. [cited by applicant]
Crum, et al. “Peripheral nerve stimulation and monitoring during operative procedures.” Muscles & nerve 35.2: 159-170. (Year: 2007). [cited by applicant]
Crum, et al. “intraoperative peripheral nerve stimulation and recording.” Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology 8: 364-370. (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
China National Intellectual Property Adminsitration, “Office Action,” Chinese Application No. 202110429148.7, Nov. 23, 2023. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” European Application No. 18771706.1, mailed Jul. 4, 2023. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report,” European Application No. 23188630.0, Sep. 5, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 13784125.0, mailed on Dec. 9, 2015, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 16789949.1, mailed on Dec. 4, 2018, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fishel, et al., Case Report: Postoperative Injuries of Upper Limb Nerves, The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 6, No. 2, Jun. 1990, pp. 128-130. [cited by applicant]
Graham, et al., Brachial Plexus Injury After Median Sternotomy, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol. 44, Jul. 1981, pp. 621-625. [cited by applicant]
Hickey et al., “Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potential Monitoring Predicts Peripheral Nerve Injury During Cardiac Surgery”, Anesthesiology 78(1), 29-35 (1993). [cited by applicant]
Hongxuan Zhang et al., “Intraoperative Neurological Monitoring,” vol. 25, No. 4, Jul. 1, 2006 (Jul. 1, 2006), pp. 39-45. [cited by applicant]
International Search Authority, “Search Report and Written Opinion,” International Application No. PCT/US/2023/029024, Dec. 15, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2014/064433, dated Apr. 4, 2015, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2010/034076, dated Jul. 9, 2010, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/030605, mailed on Aug. 8, 2016, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Winfree, et al., Intraoperative Positioning Nerve Injuries, Surgical Neurology, vol. 63, No. 1, Jan. 2005, pp. 5-18. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Office Action,” Japanese Application No. 2022191709, mailed Nov. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Jellish, et al., Hands-Up Positioning During Asymmetric Sternal Retraction for Internal Mammary Artery Harvest: A Possible Method to Reduce Brachial Plexus Injury, Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 84, No. 2, Feb. 1997, pp… [cited by applicant]
Kamel et al., “The Use of Sematosensory Evoked Potentials to Determine the Relationship Between Patient Positioning and Impending Upper Extremity Nerve Injury During Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis”, Anesth Anal… [cited by applicant]
Labrom et al., “Clinical Usefulness of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials for Detection of Brachial Plexopathy Secondary to Malpositioning in Scoliosis Surgery”, Spine 30(18), 2089-2093 (2005). [cited by applicant]
Makarov, et al., Intraoperative SSEP Monitoring During External Fixation Procedures in the Lower Extremities, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 16, No. 2, Mar./Apr. 1996, pp. 155-160. [cited by applicant]
Makarov, et al., Monitoring Peripheral Nerve Function During External Fixation of Upper Extremities, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, vol. 17, No. 5, Sep./Oct. 1997, pp. 663-667. [cited by applicant]
Makeig, et al., Mining event-related brain dynamics, Trends in Cognitive Sciences. vol. 8, No. 5, May 2004, pp. 204-210. [cited by applicant]
Nagda, et al., Neer Award 2005: Peripheral Nerve Function During Shoulder Arthoplasty Using Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 16, No. 3, Supplement, May-Jun. 2007, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Posta, Jr., et al., Neurologic Injury in the Upper Extremity After Total Hip Arthroplasty, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 345, Dec. 1997, pp. 181-186. [cited by applicant]
Prielipp, et al., Ulnar Nerve Pressure: Influence of Arm Position and Relationship to Somatosensory Evoked Potentials, Anesthesiology, vol. 91, No. 2, Aug. 1999, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP 14 86 1025, dated Jun. 26, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Warner et al. (Dec. 1994) “Ulnar Neuropathy. Incidence, Outcome, and Risk Factors in Sedated or Anesthetized Patients”, Anesthesiology, 81(6):1332-1340. [cited by applicant]
Calancie, Blair et al., “Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgery,” J Neurosurg, vol. 74, No. 6, Jun. 1991, 897-904. [cited by applicant]
Calencie, Blair et al., “Threshold-level repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation for intraoperative monitoring of central motor conduction,” J Neurosurg (Spine 1), vol. 95, No. 2, Oct. 2001, 161-168. [cited by applicant]
Conde, Virginia et al., “The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies,” NeuroImage, vol. 185, 2019, 300-312. [cited by applicant]
Deletis, V. et al., “Facilitation of motor evoked potentials by somatosensory afferent stimulation,” Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 85, No. 5, May 1992, 302-310. [cited by applicant]
Yamamoto Yusuke et al: “Tetanic stimulation of the peripheral nerve augments motor evoked potentials by re-exciting spinal anterior horn cells”, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, vol. 36, No. 1, Jan. 9, 2021… [cited by applicant]
Haghighi, Sivanash S. et al., “Effect of Desflurane Anesthesia on Transcortical Motor Evoked Potenitals,” Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthegiology, vol. 8, No. 1, 1996, 47-51. [cited by applicant]
Hosel Katarina et al, “Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Response to a Modified 30 Hz Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Protocol in Healthy Adults”, Dec. 12, 2021, vol. 11, No. 12, p. 1640. [cited by applicant]
International Bureau, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2023/022575, Nov. 28, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Ito, Zenya et al., “Usefulness of multi-channels in interaoperative spinal cord monitoring: multi-center study by the monitoring committee of the Japanese Society for Spine surgery and related research,” Eur Spine J, vo… [cited by applicant]
Journee, H.-L. et al., “Conditioning stimulation techniques for enhancement of transcranially elicited evoked motor responses,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 37, No. 6, Nov. 2007, 423-430. [cited by applicant]
Kothbauer, Karl F. et al., “Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures,” Neurosurgical F… [cited by applicant]
Legatt, Alan D. et al., “Guideline on Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Motor Evoked Potential (TES-MEP) Monitoring,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 33, No. 1, Feb. 2016, 42-50. [cited by applicant]
Lima, Ernesto et al., “Linked Quadri-Polar (LQP-TceMEP) Technique during a scoliosis procedure: a case report,” Neurlological Monitoring Associates, LLC, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lo, YL et al., “Intra-operative monitoring in scoliosis surgery with multi-pulse cortical stimuli and desflurane anesthesia,” Spinal Cord, vol. 42, No. 6, 2004, 342-345. [cited by applicant]
MacDonald, D.B. et al., “Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring—A position statement by the American Society of Neruophysiological Monitoring,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 124, No. 12, Sep. 2013, 2291-2316. [cited by applicant]
Masuda, Keisuke et al., “Monophasic transcranial constant-current versus constant-voltage stimulation of motor-evoked potentials during spinal surgery,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, No. 3773, Mar. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Merton, P. A. et al., “Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject,” Nature, vol. 285, No. 5762, Mar. 1980, 227. [cited by applicant]
Ohashi, Masayuki et al., “False-negative transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during surgery for congenital lumbar kyphoscoliosis: a case report,” vol. 3, No. 17053, Sep. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Schwartz, Stephanie L. et al., ““Quadripolar” Transcranial Electrical Stimulation for Motor Evoked Potentials,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 39, No. 1, Jan. 2022, 92-97. [cited by applicant]
Shigematsu, Hideki et al., “Higher success rate with transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials using constant-voltage stimulation . . . ,” The Spine Journal, vol. 17, No. 10, Oct. 2017, 1472-1479. [cited by applicant]
Szelenyi, Andrea et al., “Transcranial electric stimulation for intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring: Stimulation parameters and elctrode montages,” Clnical Neurophysiology, vol. 118, No. 7, Jul. 2007, 1586-… [cited by applicant]
Thirumala, Parthasarathy D. et al., “Alarm criteria for motor evoked potentials,” Nuerology India, vol. 65, No. 4, 2017, 708-715. [cited by applicant]
Thirumala, Parthasarathy D. et al., “Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited,” The Spine Journal, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 2014, 1572-1580. [cited by applicant]
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Decision of Rejection,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 202110429148.7, Jun. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]
China National Intellectual Property Administration, “Second Office Action,” for Chinese Patent Application No. 202110429148.7, Apr. 20, 2024. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC,” for European Patent Application No. 18771706.1, May 2, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Allowance,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2022-191709, May 7, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Doemges, et al., “Changes in the Stretch Reflex of the Human First Dorsal Interosseous Muscle During Different Tasks,” Journal of Physiology, 1992, pp. 563-573, vol. 447. [cited by applicant]
The International Bureau of WIPO, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability,” International Application No. PCT/US2022/019798, Sep. 21, 2023. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office acting as International Searching Authority, “Search Report and Written Opinion,” International Application No. PCT/US2022/019798, Jul. 6, 2022. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC,” European Application No. 20192956.9, Mar. 27, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Cecotti, Hubert. “A time frequency convolutional neural network for the offline classification of steady-state visual evoked potential responses.” Pattern Recognition Letters 32.8 (2011): 1145-1153. (Year: 2011),. [cited by applicant]
Japan Patent Office, “Notice of Refusal,” for Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-553052, Dec. 9, 2025. [cited by applicant]
S. Xue, X. Geng and D. Li, “Feature Extraction and Classification of EEG Signal Based on Deep Learning,” 2022 International Conference on Intelligent Transportation, Big Data & Smart City (ICITBS), Hengyang, China, 2022… [cited by applicant]