IP Library Granted Patent US 12,537,735
Granted Patent B2
US 12,537,735 · App. 18/353,227 · Granted Jan 27, 2026

Mobile network synchronization domain anomaly identification and correlation

Inventors: Patrick Leask (Dalgety Bay, GB); Sebastien Prieur (Montreal, CA)
Assignee: TC France S.A.S.
H04L41/065H04L51/23
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,537,735
App. No.
18/353,227
Granted
Jan 27, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods of mobile network synchronization domain anomaly identification and correlation include receiving measurements from a synchronization domain reflecting the performance of synchronization across a mobile network; identifying synchronization domain anomalies in the measurements from the synchronization domain; correlating of the synchronization domain anomalies against anomalies from other domains of the mobile network; and one or more of (1) identifying root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from other domains, (2) identifying associated impact on services and/or subscribers of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from other domains, and (3) identifying remedial actions for the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from other domains.

Claims (40)

1 . A method implemented by a cloud service for mobile network synchronization domain anomaly identification and correlation, the method comprising steps of:

receiving, at the cloud service, measurements from a synchronization domain reflecting performance of synchronization across a mobile network;

identifying synchronization domain anomalies in the measurements from the synchronization domain, wherein an anomaly is an event in the mobile network causing any of network outages, disruptions, and poor quality;

performing an automated cross-domain correlation via a cloud-based cross-domain correlation system, the automated cross-domain correlation correlating the synchronization domain anomalies against anomalies from other domains of the mobile network via the cloud service, wherein the anomalies from the other domains are detected from performance data collected from components of each respective domain; and

based on the correlation (1) identifying root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, (2) identifying associated impact on services and/or subscribers of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, and (3) identifying remedial actions for the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains;

wherein the correlating of the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains includes a transport network domain of a transport network, where anomalies associated with the transport network domain are determined based on any of resource utilization, port utilization, dropped packets, packet loss, latency, and jitter, and wherein identifying the root causes includes determining by detecting anomalies independently prior to the correlating wherein correlating the anomalies associated with the transport network domain with the synchronization domain anomalies indicates where the transport network has not been able to successfully deliver Precision Time Protocol (PTP) timing messages between a plurality of clocks.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the other domains include one or more of a radio access network (RAN) domain, the transport domain, and a mobile core domain.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the synchronization domain includes

receivers in the mobile network configured to calculate a reference time from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); and

a plurality of clocks configured to measure transmission delays, calculate the reference time, and communicate to one another via precision time protocol (PTP) messages.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurements are synchronization metrics from the synchronization domain taken at each end point where time and phase synchronization is required and include any of a maximum time error (TE), a constant time error (cTE), and a dynamic time error (dTE), each synchronization metric being determined at a mobile network location defining a point in the mobile network.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the synchronization domain anomalies are further correlated with anomalies from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) domain, and based thereon, a root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies is determined to be due to an accuracy of a received time reference based on any of average signal strengths of all satellites in use, Time Dilution of Precision (TDOP), Position of Dilution of Precision (PDOP), and mean accuracy associated with the GNSS domain.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the correlating of the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains further includes a radio access network (RAN) domain and a mobile core domain, and wherein the anomalies from the other domains are based on any of failures, Data radio bearer (DRB) Accessibility, Quality of service (QOS) Flow Retainability, DRB Retainability, and Handover Success Rate.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains are defined by time values, severity, impact, and a dimensional signature.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the correlating the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains of the mobile network further includes

analyzing measurements from the synchronization domain and measurements from the other domains, collectively forming measurements data on several dimensions associated with an event.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the analyzing includes determining precision time protocol (PTP) messages are being dropped or delayed, determining a root cause of the synchronization domain anomalies is a transport domain issue.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the analyzing includes determining a correlation between the synchronization domain anomalies and a mobile core anomaly, determining a root cause of the mobile core anomaly is a synchronization domain issue.

11 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the analyzing includes determining a correlation between the synchronization domain anomalies and a radio access network (RAN) anomaly, determining a root cause of the RAN anomaly is a synchronization domain issue.

12 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions, for mobile network synchronization domain anomaly identification and correlation, that, when executed, cause one or more processors associated with a cloud service to:

receive, at the cloud service, measurements from a synchronization domain reflecting performance of synchronization across a mobile network;

identifying synchronization domain anomalies in the measurements from the synchronization domain, wherein an anomaly is an event in the mobile network causing any of network outages, disruptions, and poor quality;

performing an automated cross-domain correlation via a cloud-based cross-domain correlation system, the automated cross-domain correlation correlates the synchronization domain anomalies against anomalies from other domains of the mobile network via the cloud service, wherein the anomalies from the other domains are detected from performance data collected from components of each respective domain; and

based on the correlation (1) identify root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, (2) identify associated impact on services and/or subscribers of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, and (3) identify remedial actions for the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains;

wherein the correlating of the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains includes a transport network domain of a transport network, where anomalies associated with the transport network domain are determined based on any of resource utilization, port utilization, dropped packets, packet loss, latency, and jitter, and wherein identifying the root causes includes determining by detecting anomalies independently prior to the correlating wherein correlating the anomalies associated with the transport network domain with the synchronization domain anomalies indicates where the transport network has not been able to successfully deliver Precision Time Protocol (PTP) timing messages between a plurality of clocks.

13 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the other domains include one or more of a radio access network (RAN) domain, the transport domain, and a mobile core domain.

14 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the synchronization domain includes

receivers in the mobile network configured to calculate a reference time from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS); and

a plurality of clocks configured to measure transmission delays, calculate the reference time, and communicate to one another via precision time protocol (PTP) messages.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the measurements from the synchronization domain include any of a maximum time error (TE), a constant time error (cTE), and a dynamic time error (dTE), each being determined at a point in the mobile network.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the synchronization domain anomalies are further correlated with anomalies from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) domain, and based thereon, a root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies is determined to be due to an accuracy of a received time reference based on any of average signal strengths of all satellites in use, Time Dilution of Precision (TDOP), Position of Dilution of Precision (PDOP), and mean accuracy associated with the GNSS domain.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the correlating of the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains includes a radio access network (RAN) domain and a mobile core domain, and wherein the anomalies from the other domains are based on any of failures, Data radio bearer (DRB) Accessibility, Quality of service (QOS) Flow Retainability, DRB Retainability, and Handover Success Rate.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the correlating the synchronization domain anomalies against the anomalies from the other domains of the mobile network further includes

analyzing measurements from the synchronization domain and measurements from the other domains, collectively forming measurements data on several dimensions associated with an event.

19 . A method implemented by a cloud service for mobile network synchronization domain anomaly identification and correlation, the method comprising steps of:

receiving, at the cloud service, measurements from a synchronization domain reflecting performance of synchronization across a mobile network;

identifying synchronization domain anomalies in the measurements from the synchronization domain, wherein an anomaly is an event in the mobile network causing any of network outages, disruptions, and poor quality;

performing an automated cross-domain correlation via a cloud-based cross-domain correlation system, the automated cross-domain correlation correlating the synchronization domain anomalies against anomalies from other domains of the mobile network via the cloud service, wherein the anomalies from the other domains are detected from performance data collected from components of each respective domain; and

based on the correlation (1) identifying root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, (2) identifying associated impact on services and/or subscribers of the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains, and (3) identifying remedial actions for the synchronization domain anomalies and the anomalies from the other domains;

wherein the synchronization domain anomalies are correlated with anomalies from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) domain, and based thereon, the root causes of the synchronization domain anomalies is determined to be due to an accuracy of a received time reference based on any of average signal strengths of all satellites in use, Time Dilution of Precision (TDOP), Position of Dilution of Precision (PDOP), and mean accuracy associated with the GNSS domain.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2025
From: EXFO SOLUTIONS SAS
To: TC FRANCE S.A.S.
Reel/Frame 073329/0624 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 28, 2025
From: EXFO INC.
To: EXFO SOLUTIONS SAS
Reel/Frame 070035/0499 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 21, 2023
From: EXFO SOLUTIONS SAS
To: EXFO INC.
Reel/Frame 065928/0957 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2023
From: EXFO INC.
To: EXFO SOLUTIONS SAS
Reel/Frame 064463/0929 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2023
From: PRIEUR, SEBASTIEN
To: EXFO INC.
Reel/Frame 064463/0706 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2023
From: LEASK, PATRICK
To: EXFO EUROPE LIMITED
Reel/Frame 064463/0566 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 2, 2023
From: EXFO EUROPE LIMITED
To: EXFO INC.
Reel/Frame 064463/0856 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63389978 · Jul 18, 2022
Related Publication 20240056346A1 · Feb 15, 2024
References Cited (50)
US 7372875B2 · Hadzic · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 9788291B1 · Tracy · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10594542B2 · Jeyakumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11005585B1 · Gopalakrishnan · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11115142B1 · Ozarkar · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11522766B2 · Boussac et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040027277A1 · Diggelen · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20070067264A1 · Froehlich · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090183030A1 · Bethke · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100268797A1 · Pyrik · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110158114A1 · Novak · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120275377A1 · Lehane · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130235888A1 · Bui · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140192826A1 · Zampetti · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150071308A1 · Webb, III et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150333998A1 · Gopalakrishnan · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160006526A1 · Cho · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170094537A1 · Yang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170373950A1 · Szilagyi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180069684A1 · Ziren · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180199219A1 · Kim · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190110207A1 · Makhijani · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190281077A1 · Deb · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200259896A1 · Sachs · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200267057A1 · Garvey et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200322367A1 · Salvat Lozano · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210344582A1 · Samadi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210359778A1 · Wang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220095261A1 · Smith · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220121556A1 · Guim Bernat et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220123849A1 · McCall · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220159595A1 · Lee · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220225101A1 · Fellows · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220342988A1 · Brunza · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220400394A1 · Eleftheriadis · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230128202A1 · Minda · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230152471A1 · Nekoui · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230171569A1 · Muralimanohar · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230362807A1 · Kodaypak · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240121735A1 · Li · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240298281A1 · Kovács · 2024 [cited by examiner]
WO 2021258110A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Exfo: “Nova SensAI—Reveal the invisible”, Jan. 22, 2021 (Jan. 22, 2021), pp. 1-23, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.exfo.com/contentassets/ baf1 c3e61 edf4a0a91 bc282cf825baf8/exfo-nova-sensai-solutio⋅⋅infob… [cited by applicant]
Debicki Patryk M. et al.: “Application of Al/ML Technology to Address Congestion, Quality, and Security of Private Military Network Deployments”, IST-190 Research Symposium -AI, ML and BO for Hybrid Military Operations … [cited by applicant]
Baltayan Astra: “Timing and synchronization: why it's critical for 5G networks”, Sep. 23, 2021 (Sep. 23, 2021), Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://www.exfo.com/en/resources/blog/timing-synchronization-5g.networks/… [cited by applicant]
Qing et al., Research on 5G High Precision Time Synchronous Networking Scheme [online]. 2021 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT) [retrieved on May 5, 2022]. Re… [cited by applicant]
Godor et al., A Look Inside 5G Standards to Support Time Synchronization for Smart Manufacturing, Dec. 31, 2020 [online]. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine . Sep. 2020 [retrieved on May 6, 2022]. Retrieved from the… [cited by applicant]
Li, Research into the Deployment and Application of Intelligent Time Network, Apr. 30, 2021 [online]. ZTE Technologies Apr. 2021, vol. 23 No. 2 Issue 193 [retrieved on May 6, 2022]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: ht… [cited by applicant]
Cansastro et al., Root Cause Analysis in 5G/6G Networks, Dec. 31, 2021[online]. 2021 8th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) [retrieved on May 5, 2022]. Retrieved from the Internet:… [cited by applicant]
Bhalgat, Deploying Time-Sensitive 5G Networks at the Dawn of AI for Telcos, Mar. 8, 2021 [online]. NVIDIA Technical Blog [retrieved on May 5, 2022]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://developer.nvidia.com/blog/d… [cited by applicant]