IP Library Granted Patent US 12,079,340
Granted Patent B2
US 12,079,340 · App. 18/369,926 · Granted Sep 3, 2024

Cloud based just in time memory analysis for malware detection

Inventors: Aleksandr Dubrovsky (Los Altos, CA); Soumyadipta Das (Bangalor, IN); Senthilkumar Gopinathan Cheetancheri (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: SONICWALL INC.
G06F21/566G06F21/53G06F21/561
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,079,340
App. No.
18/369,926
Granted
Sep 3, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus consistent with the present disclosure may be performed by a Cloud computing device may use instrumentation code that remains transparent to an application program that the instrumentation code has been injected into, may perform deep packet inspection (DPI) on computer data, or identify a content rating associated with computer data. In certain instances, data sets that include executable code may be received via packetized communications or be received via other means, such as, receiving a file from a data store. The present technique allows one or more processors executing instrumentation code to monitor actions performed by the program code included in a received data set. Malware can be detected using exception handling to track memory allocations of the program code included in the received data set. Furthermore, access to content associated with malware, potential malware, or with inappropriate content ratings may be blocked.

Claims (32)

1. A method of performing analysis in a cloud computing environment, the method comprising:

receiving a data set including program code from a first computing device via a computer network interface;

collecting information regarding execution of a portion of the program code by a processor, wherein the collected information includes a first set of context information relating to one or more behaviors of the executed portion of the program code;

identifying that the first set of context information indicates one or more states associated with suspicious behavior;

monitoring the executed portion of the program code to identify a trigger based on one or more indicators that the executed portion of the program code has been previously identified as suspicious;

identifying via a deep packet inspection (DPI) that the executed portion of the program code matches a signature of a known set of malware based on the first set of context information matching a second set of context information associated with the known set of malware stored at a second computing device; and

blocking a remaining portion of the program code based on the match to the signature of the known set of malware.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the states include a compute process associated with the execution of the portion of the program code correlated to a set of computer data indicative of suspicious behavior associated with the set of known malware.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the states include one or more code sequence characteristics of malware signatures associated with the set of known malware, the code sequences identified by comparing one or more patterns associated with known sets of malware to the portion of the program code.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising sequestering the data set for analysis by the second computing device.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising polling a memory associated with the portion of program code to identify one or more actions that are designated as unauthorized or suspicious.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more states include states associated with an allocation of one or more portions of a memory associated with the executed portion of the program code.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the known set of malware using instrumentation code that matches the first set of context information to a pattern of operation associated with the known set of malware.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising retrieving a content rating associated with the known set of malware, the content rating associated with access restrictions according to a policy.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising analyzing the first set of context information via a computer in the cloud computing environment.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more states include one or more memory access patterns performed by the executed portion of program code.

11. A non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium, having embodied thereon a program executable by a processor to perform a method of performing analysis in a cloud computing environment, the method comprising:

receiving a data set including program code from a first computing device via a computer network interface;

collecting information regarding execution of a portion of the program code by a processor, wherein the collected information includes a first set of context information relating to one or more behaviors of the executed portion of the program code;

identifying that the first set of context information indicates one or more states associated with suspicious behavior;

monitoring the executed portion of the program code to identify a trigger based on one or more indicators that the executed portion of the program code has been previously identified as suspicious;

identifying via a deep packet inspection (DPI) that the executed portion of the program code matches a signature of a known set of malware based on the first set of context information matching a second set of context information associated with the known set of malware stored at a second computing device; and

blocking a remaining portion of the program code based on the match to the signature of the known set of malware.

12. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the states include a compute process associated with the execution of the portion of the program code correlated to a set of computer data indicative of suspicious behavior associated with the set of known malware.

13. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the states include one or more code sequence characteristics of malware signatures associated with the set of known malware, the code sequences identified by comparing one or more patterns associated with known sets of malware to the portion of the program code.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions executable to sequester the data set for analysis by the second computing device.

15. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions executable to poll a memory associated with the portion of program code to identify one or more actions that are designated as unauthorized or suspicious.

16. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more states include states associated with an allocation of one or more portions of a memory associated with the executed portion of the program code.

17. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions executable to identify the known set of malware using instrumentation code that matches the first set of context information to a pattern of operation associated with the known set of malware.

18. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions executable to retrieve a content rating associated with the known set of malware, the content rating associated with access restrictions according to a policy.

19. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising instructions executable to analyze the first set of context information via a computer in the cloud computing environment.

20. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the one or more states include one or more memory access patterns performed by the executed portion of program code.

Assignments (2)
FIRST LIEN IP SUPPLEMENT Recorded Jun 30, 2025
From: SONICWALL INC.
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 071758/0159 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2023
From: DUBROVSKY, ALEKSANDR; DAS, SOUMYADIPTA; CHEETANCHERI, SENTHILKUMAR GOPINATHAN
To: SONICWALL INC.
Reel/Frame 064948/0300 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17584152 · Jan 25, 2022
Continuation 16055958 · Aug 6, 2018
Provisional Application 62671293 · May 14, 2018
Related Publication 20240012907A1 · Jan 11, 2024
Cited By (3)
US 12,639,438 US 12,647,433 US 12,717,914