IP Library Granted Patent US 12,071,143
Granted Patent B2
US 12,071,143 · App. 18/370,318 · Granted Aug 27, 2024

System and method of reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups

Inventors: Micah Wind Russo (Oakland, CA); Eric Dahl (Newman Lake, WA); Theobolt N. Leung (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: QUANATA, LLC
B60W40/09G06F16/248G06F16/29
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,071,143
App. No.
18/370,318
Granted
Aug 27, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups are provided. A plurality of vehicle operators may be classified into a driver risk group based on one or more attributes (e.g., location, workplace, school, demographic, hobby, interest, etc.) shared by the plurality of vehicle operators. Vehicle sensor data (e.g., speed data, acceleration data, braking data, cornering data, following distance data, turn signal data, seatbelt use data, etc.) associated with each of the plurality of vehicle operators of the driver risk group may be analyzed. Based on the analysis of the vehicle sensor data, one or more indicia of safe driving behavior associated with the driver risk group may be identified. In response to a third-party query regarding a vehicle operator in the driver risk group, an indication of the safe driving behavior associated with the driver risk group may be provided to the third party.

Claims (65)

1. A computer-implemented method of reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups, the computer-implemented method comprising:

providing a safe driving group challenge to a first plurality of vehicle drivers and to a second plurality of vehicle drivers;

receiving, via sensors, sensor data associated with vehicles operated by the first plurality of vehicle drivers and by the second plurality of vehicle drivers;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a first group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a second group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

comparing the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance to identify an indication of safe driving behavior including at least one indication selected from a group comprising: (i) a score associated with the safe driving behavior, (ii) a rating associated with the safe driving behavior, or (iii) a description of the safe driving behavior; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to a computing device.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving a query regarding a vehicle driver of the first plurality of vehicle drivers or the second plurality of vehicle drivers from a third-party; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to the third-party in response to receiving the query.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the indication of the safe driving behavior is used to assist at least one determination selected from a group comprising: a reward, an incentive, a discount for a vehicle driver, or an access to a selective program.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

presenting the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance via a scoreboard.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 ,

wherein the first plurality of vehicle drivers are selected based on one or more attributes shared by the first plurality of vehicle drivers; and

wherein the one or more attributes shared by the first plurality of vehicle drivers include at least one attribute selected from a group consisting of: a location-related attribute, a workplace-related attribute, a school-related attribute, a demographic attribute, a hobby-related attribute, or an interest-related attribute.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers includes at least one data selected from a group consisting of: speed data, acceleration data, braking data, cornering data, following distance data, turn signal data, or seatbelt use data.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance includes comparing the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers and the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a number of vehicle drivers or a percentage of vehicle drivers whose corresponding sensor data indicate the safe driving behavior associated with the safe driving group challenge.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying an average frequency that the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers indicate the safe driving behavior associated with the safe driving group challenge.

10. A computer system for reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups, the computer system comprising:

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions thereon; and

one or more processors configured to execute the computing instructions to perform operations comprising:

providing a safe driving group challenge to a first plurality of vehicle drivers and to a second plurality of vehicle drivers;

receiving, via sensors, sensor data associated with vehicles operated by the first plurality of vehicle drivers and by the second plurality of vehicle drivers;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a first group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a second group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

comparing the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance to identify an indication of safe driving behavior including at least one indication selected from a group comprising: (i) a score associated with the safe driving behavior, (ii) a rating associated with the safe driving behavior, or (iii) a description of the safe driving behavior; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to a computing device.

11. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise:

receiving a query regarding a vehicle driver of the first plurality of vehicle drivers or the second plurality of vehicle drivers from a third-party; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to the third-party in response to receiving the query.

12. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the indication of the safe driving behavior is used to assist at least one determination selected from a group comprising: a reward, an incentive, a discount for a vehicle driver, or an access to a selective program.

13. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise:

presenting the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance via a scoreboard.

14. The computer system of claim 10 ,

wherein the first plurality of vehicle drivers are selected based on one or more attributes shared by the first plurality of vehicle drivers; and

wherein the one or more attributes shared by the first plurality of vehicle drivers include at least one attribute selected from a group consisting of: a location-related attribute, a workplace-related attribute, a school-related attribute, a demographic attribute, a hobby related attribute, or an interest-related attribute.

15. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the sensor data includes at least one data selected from a group consisting of: speed data, acceleration data, braking data, cornering data, following distance data, turn signal data, or seatbelt use data.

16. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the comparing the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance includes comparing the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers and the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers.

17. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise:

identifying a number of vehicle drivers or a percentage of vehicle drivers whose corresponding sensor data indicate the safe driving behavior associated with the safe driving group challenge.

18. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the operations further comprise:

identifying an average frequency that the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers indicate the safe driving behavior associated with the safe driving group challenge.

19. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a set of computing instructions for reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups that, when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

provide a safe driving group challenge to a first plurality of vehicle drivers and to a second plurality of vehicle drivers;

receive, via sensors, sensor data associated with vehicles operated by the first plurality of vehicle drivers and by the second plurality of vehicle drivers;

analyze the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a first group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

analyze the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a second group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge; and

compare the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance to identify an indication of safe driving behavior including at least one indication selected from a group comprising: (i) a score associated with the safe driving behavior, (ii) a rating associated with the safe driving behavior, or (iii) a description of the safe driving behavior; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to a computing device.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein the set of instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

receive a query regarding a vehicle driver of the first plurality of vehicle drivers or the second plurality of vehicle drivers from a third-party; and

provide the indication of the safe driving behavior to the third-party in response to receiving the query.

21. A computer system for reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups, the computer system comprising:

a means for storing computing instructions thereon; and

a means for executing the computing instructions to perform operations comprising:

providing a safe driving group challenge to a first plurality of vehicle drivers and to a second plurality of vehicle drivers;

receiving, via sensors, sensor data associated with vehicles operated by the first plurality of vehicle drivers and by the second plurality of vehicle drivers;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the first plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a first group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

analyzing the sensor data associated with the second plurality of vehicle drivers to determine a second group challenge performance corresponding to the safe driving group challenge;

comparing the first group challenge performance and the second group challenge performance to identify an indication of safe driving behavior including at least one indication selected from a group comprising: (i) a score associated with the safe driving behavior, (ii) a rating associated with the safe driving behavior, or (iii) a description of the safe driving behavior; and

providing the indication of the safe driving behavior to a computing device.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 29, 2024
From: BLUEOWL, LLC
To: QUANATA, LLC
Reel/Frame 067558/0600 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 7, 2024
From: RUSSO, MICAH WIND; DAHL, ERIC; LEUNG, THEOBOLT N.
To: BLUEOWL, LLC
Reel/Frame 066688/0227 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 18152387 · Jan 10, 2023
Continuation 17489439 · Sep 29, 2021
Continuation 16892812 · Jun 4, 2020
Continuation 16203244 · Nov 28, 2018
Related Publication 20240010206A1 · Jan 11, 2024