IP Library Granted Patent US 12,427,395
Granted Patent B2
US 12,427,395 · App. 18/376,115 · Granted Sep 30, 2025

System and method for monitoring location accuracy of an object tracking system

Inventors: Douglas J. DeAngelis (Ipswich, MA); Edward G. Evansen (West Newbury, MA); Gerard M. Reilly (Newton, MA); Brian D. Rhodes (Andover, MA); Joseph M. Gaudreau (Lowell, MA); Kirk M. Sigel (Ithaca, NY); Alexander T. Farkas (Chatham, MA)
A63B71/0619G06K7/10366H04W4/023H04W4/027H04W4/029H04W4/08H04W4/80
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,427,395
App. No.
18/376,115
Granted
Sep 30, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for monitoring the location accuracy of an object tracking system includes receiving, from the object tracking system, a recorded position of a wireless test tag installed at a fixed position. This fixed position may be accurately determined without the tracking system, for example, using a laser measurement device. The method includes determining a positioning error of the tracking system by comparing the recorded position, as measured with the tracking system, to the fixed position. The method also includes outputting, in response to the positioning error exceeding a threshold, an indication that the tracking system has reduced accuracy. The method may be extended to several test tags located at several fixed positions throughout the operating area of the tracking system, in which case the indication of reduced accuracy may be generated when any one or more of the test tags has a positioning error exceeding the threshold.

Claims (48)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving, from an object tracking system, a recorded position of a wireless test tag;

determining, based at least on the recorded position and a fixed position of the wireless test tag, a positioning error of the object tracking system; and

outputting, in response to the positioning error exceeding a threshold, an indication that the object tracking system has reduced accuracy.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising operating the object tracking system to measure the recorded position of the wireless test tag.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said receiving comprises:

receiving, from the object tracking system, a plurality of recorded positions of the wireless test tag; and

averaging the plurality of recorded positions to obtain an averaged position; and

said determining comprises comparing the averaged position to the fixed position.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising operating the object tracking system to measure the plurality of recorded positions of the wireless test tag.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the fixed position of the wireless test tag.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising installing the wireless test tag.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising powering the wireless test tag with a continuous power supply.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said receiving comprises receiving a recorded position of each wireless test tag of a plurality of wireless test tags;

said determining comprises determining a positioning error for said each wireless test tag by comparing the recorded position of said each wireless test tag to a fixed position of said each wireless test tag; and

said outputting comprises outputting the indication in response to the positioning error exceeding a threshold for any one or more of the plurality of wireless test tags.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said outputting includes one or both of (i) displaying the indication on a computer screen and (ii) logging the indication in a log file.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said outputting includes broadcasting the indication, via a computer network, to one or more other computers.

11. A system, comprising:

a processor;

a memory in electronic communication with the processor;

a communications interface configured to electronically communicate with an object tracking system; and

an accuracy monitor implemented as machine-readable instructions that are stored in the memory and, when executed by the processor, control the system to:

communicate, via the communications interface, with the object tracking system to receive a recorded position of a wireless test tag,

determine, based on the recorded position and a fixed position of the wireless test tag, a positioning error of the object tracking system, and

output, in response to the positioning error exceeding a threshold, an indication that the object tracking system has reduced accuracy.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein:

the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to communicate include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to:

communicate, via the communications interface, with the object tracking system to receive a plurality of recorded positions of the wireless test tag, and

average the plurality of recorded positions to obtain an averaged position; and

the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to determine include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to compare the averaged position to the fixed position.

13. The system of claim 11 , further comprising the object tracking system.

14. The system of claim 11 , further comprising the wireless test tag.

15. The system of claim 14 , further comprising a continuous power supply configured to power the wireless test tag.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein:

the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to communicate include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to communicate, via the communications interface, with the object tracking system to receive a plurality of recorded positions of the wireless test tag;

the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to determine include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to determine a positioning error for said each wireless test tag by comparing the recorded position of said each wireless test tag to a fixed position of said each wireless test tag; and

the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to output include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to output the indication in response to the positioning error exceeding a threshold for any one or more of the plurality of wireless test tags.

17. The system of claim 16 , further comprising the plurality of wireless test tags.

18. The system of claim 11 ,

further comprising a screen in electronic communication with the processor;

wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to output include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to display the indication on the screen.

19. The system of claim 11 , wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to output include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to log the indication in a log file.

20. The system of claim 11 ,

further comprising a network interface in electronic communication with the processor;

wherein the machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to output include machine-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, control the system to broadcast the indication via the network interface.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 7, 2026
From: CATAPULT SPORTS INC.
To: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
Reel/Frame 075572/0199 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 18, 2026
From: DEANGELIS, DOUGLAS J.; EVANSEN, EDWARD G.; REILLY, GERARD M.; RHODES, BRIAN D.; GAUDREAU, JOSEPH M.; SIGEL, KIRK M.; FARKAS, ALEXANDER T.
To: ISOLYNX, LLC
Reel/Frame 074113/0649 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: ISOLYNX, LLC
To: CATAPULT SPORTS INC.
Reel/Frame 073235/0073 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation 17740214 · May 9, 2022
Continuation 17207626 · Mar 20, 2021
Continuation 16455212 · Jun 27, 2019
Continuation 15814649 · Nov 16, 2017
Continuation 14960026 · Dec 4, 2015
Continuation PCTUS2014040914 · Jun 4, 2014
Provisional Application 61971940 · Mar 28, 2014
Provisional Application 61945559 · Feb 27, 2014
Provisional Application 61930378 · Jan 22, 2014
Provisional Application 61900786 · Nov 6, 2013
Provisional Application 61830961 · Jun 4, 2013
Related Publication 20240058683A1 · Feb 22, 2024
References Cited (4)
US 7432810B2 · Menache · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 10088549B2 · Nielsen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10437658B2 · Alonso · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20140188432A1 · Aljadeff · 2014 [cited by examiner]