IP Library Granted Patent US 12,157,560
Granted Patent B2
US 12,157,560 · App. 18/381,994 · Granted Dec 3, 2024

Propeller impact detection and force reduction

Inventor: Christopher Scott Saunders (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Kitty Hawk Corporation
B64C27/006B64D17/80B64D31/10B64D45/00B64D2045/0085
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,157,560
App. No.
18/381,994
Granted
Dec 3, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A commanded control signal is compared against an adaptive control signal in order to detect a rotor strike by a rotor included in an aircraft, wherein the adaptive control signal is associated with controlling the rotor and the adaptive control signal varies based at least in part on the commanded control signal and state information associated with the rotor. In response to detecting the rotor strike, a control signal to the rotor is adjusted in order to reduce a striking force associated with the rotor.

Claims (42)

1. An aircraft, comprising:

a rotor; and

a motor controller configured to generate a plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals, wherein the motor controller includes:

a rotor strike detector configured to detect a rotor strike including by comparing a commanded control signal and an adaptive control signal, wherein:

the adaptive control signal is associated with controlling the rotor and includes the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals;

a rotor strike is detected based at least on a change in a plurality of sinusoidal signals;

a first signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals has a phase offset compared with a second signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals; and

at least one of: increased magnitude and increased frequency of the plurality of sinusoidal signals corresponds to increased rotor rotation;

wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals is generated in response to detecting the rotor strike including by setting values of the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals to at least one of:

brake the rotor or exert no additional torque on the rotor; and

a drive and control unit coupled to the rotor and the motor controller, the drive and control unit being configured to in response to detecting the rotor strike, set a value of the adaptive control signal to reduce a striking force applied to an object being struck by the rotor.

2. The aircraft recited in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals indicates a directionality of rotation of the rotor.

3. The aircraft recited in claim 2 , wherein the directionality of rotation of the rotor includes a direction associated with default operation and another direction associated with braking the rotor in response to the detection of the rotor strike.

4. The aircraft recited in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals includes a first signal, a second signal with a 120 degree phase offset from the first signal, and a third signal with a 240 degree offset from the first signal.

5. The aircraft recited in claim 1 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals is generated by the drive and control unit based on at least one of: the commanded control signal, state information from sensors, and a strike indication signal from the rotor strike detector.

6. The aircraft recited in claim 1 , wherein the change in the phase-shifted sinusoidal signals includes at least one of a change corresponding to an increase in an amount of torque or a reduction in rotations per minute.

7. The aircraft recited in claim 6 , wherein the comparison of the commanded control signal and the adaptive control signal includes the change in the phase-shifted sinusoidal signals not matching the commanded control signal.

8. A method, comprising:

generating a plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals;

detecting a rotor strike including by comparing a commanded control signal and an adaptive control signal, wherein:

the adaptive control signal is associated with controlling the rotor and includes the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals;

a rotor strike is detected based at least on a change in a plurality of sinusoidal signals;

a first signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals has a phase offset compared with a second signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals;

at least one of: increased magnitude and increased frequency of the plurality of sinusoidal signals corresponds to increased rotor rotation;

the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals is generated in response to detecting the rotor strike including by setting values of the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals to at least one of: brake the rotor or exert no additional torque on the rotor; and

in response to detecting the rotor strike, setting a value of the adaptive control signal to reduce a striking force applied to an object being struck by the rotor.

9. The method recited in claim 8 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals indicates a directionality of rotation of the rotor.

10. The method recited in claim 9 , wherein the directionality of rotation of the rotor includes a direction associated with default operation and another direction associated with braking the rotor in response to the detection of the rotor strike.

11. The method recited in claim 8 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals includes a first signal, a second signal with a 120 degree phase offset from the first signal, and a third signal with a 240 degree offset from the first signal.

12. The method recited in claim 8 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals is generated based on at least one of: the commanded control signal, state information from sensors, and a strike indication signal.

13. The method recited in claim 8 , wherein the change in the phase-shifted sinusoidal signals includes at least one of a change corresponding to an increase in an amount of torque or a reduction in rotations per minute.

14. The method recited in claim 13 , wherein the comparison of the commanded control signal and the adaptive control signal includes the change in the phase-shifted sinusoidal signals not matching the commanded control signal.

15. A computer program product, the computer program product being embodied in a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:

generating a plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals;

detecting a rotor strike including by comparing a commanded control signal and an adaptive control signal, wherein:

the adaptive control signal is associated with controlling the rotor and includes a plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals;

a rotor strike is detected based at least on a change in a plurality of sinusoidal signals;

a first signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals has a phase offset compared with a second signal of the plurality of sinusoidal signals;

at least one of: increased magnitude and increased frequency of the plurality of sinusoidal signals corresponds to increased rotor rotation;

the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals is generated in response to detecting the rotor strike including by setting values of the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals to at least one of: brake the rotor or exert no additional torque on the rotor; and

in response to detecting the rotor strike, setting a value of the adaptive control signal to reduce a striking force applied to an object being struck by the rotor.

16. The computer program product recited in claim 15 , wherein the plurality of phase-shifted sinusoidal signals indicates a directionality of rotation of the rotor, the directionality including a direction associated with default operation and another direction associated with braking the rotor in response to the detection of the rotor strike.

Continuity (7)
Continuation 17895739 · Aug 25, 2022
Continuation 17022990 · Sep 16, 2020
Continuation 16673579 · Nov 4, 2019
Continuation 16249645 · Jan 16, 2019
Continuation 15877047 · Jan 22, 2018
Provisional Application 62595963 · Dec 7, 2017
Related Publication 20240043115A1 · Feb 8, 2024